Influencing Factors on Nitrogen Removal Performance of Combined Biological Aerated Filter for Secondary Effluent from Municipal WWTP

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinsong Zhang ◽  
Yue Yang ◽  
Hong-Jie Wang ◽  
Wen-Zhang Huang
Keyword(s):  
Influencing Factors ◽  
Nitrogen Removal ◽  
Secondary Effluent ◽  
Biological Aerated Filter ◽  
Aerated Filter

Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in biofilters with real time aeration control

2001 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 269-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Puznava ◽  
M. Payraudeau ◽  
D. Thornberg
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Nitrogen Removal ◽  
Simultaneous Nitrification And Denitrification ◽  
Biological Aerated Filter ◽  
Diffusion Effect ◽  
Different Depths ◽  
Nitrification And Denitrification ◽  
Aerated Filter ◽  
Denitrification Process ◽  
Aeration Control

The aim of this article is to present a new biological aerated filter (BAF) for nitrogen removal based on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification. Contrary to the systems which integrate both an aerated and a non-aerated zone to allow complete nitrogen removal in one compact or two different units (pre-denitrification and nitrification), this upflow BAF system is based on the principle of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification since the filter is completely aerated. The denitrification process is possible due to the diffusion effect which dominates biofilm processes. The real time aeration control allows us to maintain a low dissolved oxygen value (0.5 to 3 mg O2/l). In this case, the biofilm will not be fully (or less) penetrated with oxygen and denitrification will be carried out in a large part of the biofilm. Therefore, nitrification and denitrification is running simultaneously in different depths of the biofilm. By using 50% less air this BAF gave the same results (less than 20mg TN/l) on pilot plant as a classical nitrification and denitrification BAF (Toettrup et al., 1994). Less recirculation was necessary to achieve the same denitrification.

Study on Biological Aerated Filter as Enhanced Pretreatment Process of Coagulation and Sedimentation

2013 ◽  
Vol 726-731 ◽  
pp. 1940-1944 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Shen ◽  
Han Xiao ◽  
Wan Qiu Yang ◽  
De Ren Miao ◽  
Xiao Ming Li
Keyword(s):  
Power Plant ◽  
Water System ◽  
Cooling Water ◽  
Ammonia Nitrogen ◽  
Secondary Effluent ◽  
Biological Aerated Filter ◽  
Sedimentation Process ◽  
Cooling Water System ◽  
Circulating Cooling Water ◽  
Aerated Filter

Using coagulation and sedimentation process in the advanced treatment of urban secondary effluent which can be recycled to circulating cooling water system in power plant is only perform well on CODCrand turbidity removal. But the concentrations of organic matter and NH3in effluent can not meet the requirements of circulating cooling water. Therefore, in this study, the feasibility of biological aerated filter (BAF) as a pretreatment enhancing coagulation and sedimentation process was discussed. Achieved by controlling the two operating modes: (1) secondary effluentcoagulation and sedimentationeffluent; (2) secondary effluent BAFcoagulation and sedimentation effluent.The results show that the BAF pretreatment removes ammonia nitrogen effectively, and the turbidity and CODCrof effluent of BAF-coagulation sedimentation process is much lower than individual coagulation and sedimentation process. The final effluent qualities meet the requirements of circulating cooling water system in power plant.

Treatment of petrochemical secondary effluent by an up-flow biological aerated filter (BAF)

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (8) ◽  
pp. 2031-2038 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Y. Fu ◽  
C. Y. Wu ◽  
Y. X. Zhou ◽  
J. E. Zuo ◽  
Y. Ding
Keyword(s):  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Oxygen Demand ◽  
Pilot Scale ◽  
Ammonia Nitrogen ◽  
Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Secondary Effluent ◽  
Biological Aerated Filter ◽  
Total Removal ◽  
Aerated Filter ◽  
Final Effluent

In this study, petrochemical secondary effluent was treated by a 55 cm diameter pilot-scale biological aerated filter (BAF) with a media depth of 220 cm. Volcanic rock grains were filled as the BAF media. Median removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N) was 29.35 and 57.98%, respectively. Moreover, the removal profile of the COD, NH3-N, total nitrogen and total organic carbon demonstrated that the filter height of 140 cm made up to 90% of the total removal efficiency of the final effluent. By gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, removal efficiencies of 2-chloromethyl-1,3-dioxolane, and benzonitrile, indene and naphthalene were obtained, ranging from 30.12 to 63.01%. The biomass and microbial activity of the microorganisms on the filter media were in general reduced with increasing filter height, which is consistent with the removal profile of the contaminants. The detected genera Defluviicoccus, Betaproteobacteria_unclassified and the Blastocatella constituted 1.86–6.75% of the identified gene, enhancing the COD and nitrogen removal in BAF for treating petrochemical secondary effluent.

Nitrification and denitrification in partially aerated biological aerated filter (BAF) with dual size sand media

2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 9-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.H. Ha ◽  
S.K. Ong
Keyword(s):  
Total Nitrogen ◽  
Nitrogen Removal ◽  
Pilot Scale ◽  
Biological Aerated Filter ◽  
Loading Rates ◽  
Oxic Zone ◽  
Nitrogen Concentrations ◽  
Total Nitrogen Removal ◽  
Aerated Filter ◽  
Anoxic Zones

A 104-mm (4-inch) diameter pilot-scale biological aerated filter (BAF) with a media depth of 2.5 m (8.3 feet) was operated with an anaerobic, anoxic and oxic zone at a temperature of 23°C. The medium for the anaerobic and anoxic zones was 10 mm diameter sand while the medium for the oxic zone was 5 mm diameter sand. The influent sCOD and total nitrogen concentrations in the feedwater were approximately 250 mg/L and 35 mg N/L, respectively. sCOD removal at optimum hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 3 h with recirculation rates of 100, 200 and 300% in the column was above 96%. Nitrification was found to be more than 96% for 3 h HRT at 200 and 300% recirculation. Total nitrogen removal was consistent at more than 80% for 4 and 6 h HRT at 300% recirculation. For 3 h HRT and 300% recirculation, total nitrogen removal was approximately 79%. The ammonia loading rates for maximum ammonia removed were 0.15 and 0.19 kg NH3-N/m3-day for 100 and 200% recirculation, respectively. The experimental results demonstrated that the BAF can be operated at an HRT of 3 h with 200–300% recirculation rates with more than 96% removal of sCOD and ammonia and at least 75% removal of total nitrogen.

scholarly journals Nitrification of low concentration ammonia nitrogen using zeolite biological aerated filter (ZBAF)

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 554-560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Su Kim ◽  
Ji-Young Lee ◽  
Seung-Kyu Choi ◽  
Qian Zhu ◽  
Sang-Ill Lee
Keyword(s):  
Removal Efficiency ◽  
Nitrogen Removal ◽  
Municipal Wastewater ◽  
Pond Water ◽  
Ammonia Nitrogen ◽  
Biological Aerated Filter ◽  
Efficient Treatment ◽  
Low Concentration ◽  
Nitrogen Treatment ◽  
Aerated Filter

This study focuses on nitrification through a biological aerated filter (BAF) that is filled with a zeolite medium at low concentrations of ammonia. The zeolite medium consists of natural zeolite powder. The BAF is operated under two types of media, which are a ball-type zeolite medium and expanded poly propylene (EPP) medium. Nitrification occurred in the zeolite BAF (ZBAF) when the influent concentration of ammonia nitrogen was 3 mg L-1, but the BAF that was filled with an EPP medium did not experience nitrification. The ammonia nitrogen removal efficiency of ZBAF was 63.38% and the average nitrate nitrogen concentration was 1.746 mg/L. The ZBAF was tested again after a comparison experiment to treat pond water, and municipal wastewater mixed pond water. The ZBAF showed remarkable ammonia-nitrogen treatment at low concentration and low temperature. During this period, the average ammonia nitrogen removal efficiency was 64.56%. Especially, when water temperature decreased to 4.7℃, ammonia nitrogen removal efficiency remained 79%. On the other hand, the chemical-oxygen demand (COD) and phosphorus-removal trends were different. The COD and phosphorus did not show as efficient treatment as the ammonia-nitrogen treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document