A Review of 3-D Green's Functions for Integral Equation Modeling of Electromagnetic Scattering from 1/2/3-D Periodic Structures Using Ewald Transformation

Author(s):  
Ivica Stevanovic ◽  
Aleksandar Terzic ◽  
Pedro Crespo-Valero
Geophysics ◽  
1975 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 309-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald W. Hohmann

The induced polarization (IP) and electromagnetic (EM) responses of a three‐dimensional body in the earth can be calculated using an integral equation solution. The problem is formulated by replacing the body by a volume of polarization or scattering current. The integral equation is reduced to a matrix equation, which is solved numerically for the electric field in the body. Then the electric and magnetic fields outside the inhomogeneity can be found by integrating the appropriate dyadic Green’s functions over the scattering current. Because half‐space Green’s functions are used, it is only necessary to solve for scattering currents in the body—not throughout the earth. Numerical results for a number of practical cases show, for example, that for moderate conductivity contrasts the dipole‐dipole IP response of a body five units in strike length approximates that of a two‐dimensional body. Moving an IP line off the center of a body produces an effect similar to that of increasing the depth. IP response varies significantly with conductivity contrast; the peak response occurs at higher contrasts for two‐dimensional bodies than for bodies of limited length. Very conductive bodies can produce negative IP response due to EM induction. An electrically polarizable body produces a small magnetic field, so that it is possible to measure IP with a sensitive magnetometer. Calculations show that horizontal loop EM response is enhanced when the background resistivity in the earth is reduced, thus confirming scale model results.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document