Patient-Centered Strategies to Increase Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials

Author(s):  
Lynette Hammond Gerido ◽  
Zhe He
2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e280-e289
Author(s):  
Jeremy Lewin ◽  
Jennifer A. H. Bell ◽  
Kate Wang ◽  
Victoria Forcina ◽  
Seline Tam ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Participation in cancer clinical trials (CCTs) for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) remains the lowest of any patient group with cancer. Little is known about the personal barriers to AYA accrual. The aim of this study was to explore AYA attitudes that influence CCT participation. METHODS: A mixed-methods approach was used. AYAs and non-AYAs (≥ 40 years) completed the Cancer Treatment subscale of the Attitudes Toward Cancer Trials Scales and 9 supplementary questions formed from interview analysis. Differences between AYA and non-AYA cohorts were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate the effect of demographics on perceptions of CCTs. RESULTS: Surveys were distributed to 61 AYAs (median age, 29 years; range, 17-39 years) and 74 non-AYAs (median age, 55 years; range, 40-88 years). Compared with non-AYAs, AYAs perceived CCTs to be unsafe/more difficult (Personal Barrier/Safety domain; P = .01). There were no differences based on age in other domains. AYAs were also more concerned with CCT interference in their long-term goals ( P = .04). Multivariable ordered logistic regression identified increased personal barriers in the Personal Barrier/Safety domain for AYAs ( P = .01), in patients with English as a second language (ESL; P < .01), and in patients previously not offered a clinical trial ( P = .03). Long-term goals were identified as a barrier in particular tumor types ( P = .01) and in patients with ESL ( P < .01), with a trend identified in AYAs ( P = .12). CONCLUSION: Age-related differences in attitudes toward CCTs suggest that tailored approaches to CCT accrual are warranted. Patient-centered delivery of information regarding CCTs, particularly in patients with ESL and who are trial naïve, may improve accrual.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Eggly ◽  
Mark Manning ◽  
Nicole Senft ◽  
Tanina Foster Moore ◽  
Terrance L. Albrecht ◽  
...  

Abstract PurposeClinical trials are critical to advancing cancer treatments, yet their impact is hindered by low accrual rates, especially among minorities. One barrier is the quality of physician communication during clinical interactions in which trials are discussed. We describe the development and pilot test of a physician-focused, web-based training module designed as an intervention to improve physician communication related to discussing clinical trials in a diverse cancer patient population. The purpose of the pilot test was to assess acceptability and preliminary effectiveness in improving physician beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and comfort related to discussing cancer clinical trials with patients and families in a diverse patient population.MethodA team of researchers, clinicians, and community members developed the training module based on current communication research and analysis of an archive of video-recorded patient-oncologist interactions. The module included a brief didactic video explaining patient-centered communication strategies for discussing trials, and re-enactments of selected video clips from the archive to provide illustrations and guide opportunities for reflection. For the pilot test, the module was provided to physician participants in the Partnering Around Cancer Clinical Trials (PACCT) trial at two NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers. Pre-post measures included assessments of change in beliefs, behavioral attitudes, knowledge and comfort related to discussing trials; measures also assessed evaluations of the module. ResultsNineteen physicians participated in the pilot test of the module. Most were very experienced in discussing trials. Pre-post assessments indicated mixed findings about beliefs, marginal improvement in attitudes, and a significant improvement in knowledge, but no change in comfort discussing trials. Feedback on the module was favorable. ConclusionsThis pilot test of a stakeholder-developed physician communication training module demonstrated its acceptability and effectiveness, even in this highly-experienced physician sample. Future research is needed to determine its effectiveness on communication in clinical settings. Trial Registration Number NCT02906241


2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (3 Suppl 6) ◽  
pp. 56-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Gillies McKenna ◽  
Ruth J. Muschel ◽  
Anjali Gupta ◽  
Stephen Hahn ◽  
Eric J. Bernhard

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (11) ◽  
pp. e1914531
Author(s):  
Ghassan Al-Shbool ◽  
Hira Latif ◽  
Saira Farid ◽  
Shuqi Wang ◽  
Jaeil Ahn ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2599-2601 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. CARRIER ◽  
A. A. KHORANA ◽  
J. I. ZWICKER ◽  
G. H. LYMAN ◽  
G. LE GAL ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document