Overcut and material removal rate on electrochemical machining of aluminum and stainless steel using isolated brass electrode

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aris Widyo Nugroho ◽  
Sudarisman ◽  
M. Budi Nurahman ◽  
Purna Septiaji
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Material Removal Rate ◽  
Material Removal ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Electrochemical Machining

Effect of valency on material removal rate in electrochemical machining of aluminium

2008 ◽  
Vol 202 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 398-401 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.K. Mukherjee ◽  
S. Kumar ◽  
P.K. Srivastava ◽  
Arbind Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Material Removal Rate ◽  
Material Removal ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Electrochemical Machining

scholarly journals Improve the Material Removal Rate of Electrochemical Grinding on Monel 400 Using RSM

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 3219-3222
Keyword(s):  
Material Removal Rate ◽  
Material Removal ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Electrochemical Machining ◽  
Machining Process ◽  
Depth Of Cut ◽  
Grinding Wheel ◽  
Mechanical Grinding ◽  
Monel 400 ◽  
Electrochemical Grinding

Electrochemical grinding is combination of electrochemical machining and mechanical grinding process.in this process 90%-98% percentage of material are removed by electrochemical machining, only 3%-5% of materials can only remove by mechanical grinding process. Faradays law of electrolysis (or) reverse electroplating act as a basic principle for this ECG process. This ECG has various advantages than other machining process for high strength materials .low induvial stress, large depth of cut .here Monel 400 alloy take base material ,its Ni-Cu alloy so it’s have very high level corrosion resistance, so it’s used in marine engineering ,heat exchanger. Here silicon carbide abrasive insulated brass grinding wheel used instead of copper bonded diamond wheel. Voltage, electrolyte concentration, electrolyte flowrate take are the parameters of this process. Three factors and two levels of RSM methodology takes for optimization. The Analysis of variance (ANOVA) has been delivers the variation between the parameters performed to develop mathematical model. The parameters high voltage and concentration of electrolyte to produce maximum material removal rate.

Analysis on the Influence of Oxidant in CMP of Ultra-Thin Stainless Steel

2014 ◽  
Vol 1027 ◽  
pp. 167-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Xiu Su ◽  
Jia Peng Chen ◽  
Hai Feng Cheng ◽  
Song Zhan Fan
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Material Removal Rate ◽  
Chemical Mechanical Polishing ◽  
Material Removal ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Mechanical Polishing ◽  
304 Stainless Steel ◽  
Research Results

In chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) of ultra-thin stainless steel, the oxidant of polishing slurry determines the material removal rate (MRR). In this paper, the influences of oxidant in slurry on MRR and surface roughness have been studied in CMP of ultra-thin 304 stainless steel based on alumina (Al2O3) abrasive. The research results show that, in the same conditions, the MRR increases with the increase of the oxidant C and the oxidant B, the MRR decreases with the increase of the oxidant A and the MRR is max with the oxidant C. It indicated that the oxidant C has a large effect on MRR in CMP of the 304 stainless steel. The research results can provide the reference for studying the slurry in CMP of ultra-thin stainless steel.

Influences of Properties of Fixed Abrasive Tool on the Lapping Process of Stainless Steel Substrate

2010 ◽  
Vol 135 ◽  
pp. 365-369
Author(s):  
Cong Rong Zhu ◽  
Bing Hai Lv ◽  
Ju Long Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Material Removal Rate ◽  
Material Removal ◽  
Stainless Steel Substrate ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Steel Substrate ◽  
Abrasive Tool ◽  
Bonding Material ◽  
Fixed Abrasive

To improve the machining efficiency as well as surface roughness, a series of experiments employed fixed abrasive tools are carried out for stainless steel substrate, and influences of properties of fixed abrasive tool on the lapping process are studied. It is found that the resin is the best bonding material in this study. The surface roughness under different concentration of bonding material is similar, and the material removal rate (MRR) increases as the concentration of bonding material decreases from 50% to 20%. But too little of bonding material results into low bond strength that causing low material removal rate. It is also found that higher shear strength, lower wear rate, and the shear strength of the tool with 35% bonding material is the highest. It is obvious that the surface roughness and material removal rate decline as the grit size decreases. The roughness of surface lapped with resin bonded 4000# SiC abrasive tool comes to 18nm, and the material removal rate is 0.63μm/min.

scholarly journals Impacts of traverse speed and material thickness in abrasive waterjet contour cutting of Austenitic stainless steel AISI 304L

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer llanto ◽  
Majid Tolouei-Rad ◽  
Ana Vafadar ◽  
Muhammad Aamir
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
Austenitic Stainless Steel ◽  
Material Removal Rate ◽  
Material Removal ◽  
Removal Rate ◽  
Traverse Speed ◽  
Abrasive Waterjet ◽  
Taper Angle ◽  
Material Thickness ◽  
Kerf Taper

Abstract Austenitic stainless steel 304L (AISI304L), of varied thickness, is widely used in the fabrication industry and in many cases, it requires contour machining for achieving intricate profiles. Abrasive water jet machine is a proficient alternative for machining difficult-to-cut, reflective, conductive, and heat-sensitive materials such as austenitic stainless steel with complex geometries. However, due to differences in machining responses for varied material conditions, the abrasive waterjet machine experiences challenges such as kerf geometric inaccuracy and low material removal rate. In this study, an abrasive waterjet machine is employed to perform contour cutting of different profiles to investigate the impacts of traverse speed and material thickness in achieving a lower kerf taper angle and higher material removal rate. Experimental results show that all profiles encountered a similar trend of obtaining higher kerf taper angle and material removal rate as traverse speed increased. Analysis of variance revealed that material thickness denotes a more significant impact to kerf taper angle and material removal rate with a contribution within the range of 69%-91% and 62-69% respectively; whereas traverse speed indicates the least contributing factor within the range of 5%-18% in kerf taper angle and 27%-36% for material removal rate.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document