Using Quantile Mapping to Correct WRF Precipitation for Improvement of Runoff Simulation in Manas River Basin

Author(s):  
Jiapei Ma ◽  
Hongyi Li ◽  
Jian Wang ◽  
Huajin Lei
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 946-957
Author(s):  
Xinchen Gu ◽  
Guang Yang ◽  
Xinlin He ◽  
Li Zhao ◽  
Xiaolong Li ◽  
...  

AbstractThe inability to conduct hydrological simulations in areas that lack historical meteorological data is an important factor limiting the development of watershed models, understanding of watershed water resources, and ultimate development of effective sustainability policies. This study focuses on the Manas River Basin (MRB), which is a high-altitude area with no meteorological stations and is located on the northern slope of the Tianshan Mountains, northern China. The hydrological processes were simulated using the China Meteorological Assimilation Driving Datasets for the SWAT model (CMADS) using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. Simulated runoff was corrected using calibration/uncertainty and sensitivity program for the SWAT. Through parameter sensitivity analysis, parameter calibration, and verification, the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), adjusted R-square ({R}_{\text{adj}}^{2}), and percentage bias (\text{PBIAS}) were selected for evaluation. The results were compared with statistics obtained from Kenswat Hydrological Station, where the monthly runoff simulation efficiency was \text{NSE}\hspace{.25em}=0.64, {R}_{\text{adj}}^{2}\hspace{.25em}=0.69, and \text{PBIAS}\hspace{.25em}=\mbox{--}0.9, and the daily runoff simulation efficiency was \text{NSE}\hspace{.25em}=0.75, {R}_{\text{adj}}^{2} = 0.75, \text{PBIAS} = −1.5. These results indicate that by employing CMADS data, hydrological processes within the MRB can be adequately simulated. This finding is significant, as CMADS provide continuous temporal, detailed, and high-spatial-resolution meteorological data that can be used to build a hydrological model with adequate accuracy in areas that lack historical meteorological data.


Water ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Ren ◽  
Lian-qing Xue ◽  
Yuan-hong Liu ◽  
Jia Shi ◽  
Qiang Han ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Maedeh Enayati ◽  
Omid Bozorg-Haddad ◽  
Javad Bazrafshan ◽  
Somayeh Hejabi ◽  
Xuefeng Chu

Abstract This study aims to conduct a thorough investigation to compare the abilities of QM techniques as a bias correction method for the raw outputs from GCM/RCM combinations. The Karkheh River basin in Iran was selected as a case study, due to its diverse topographic features, to test the performances of the bias correction methods under different conditions. The outputs of two GCM/RCM combinations (ICHEC and NOAA-ESM) were acquired from the CORDEX dataset for this study. The results indicated that the performances of the QMs varied, depending on the transformation functions, parameter sets, and topographic conditions. In some cases, the QMs' adjustments even made the GCM/RCM combinations' raw outputs worse. The result of this study suggested that apart from DIST, PTF:scale, and SSPLIN, the rest of the considered QM methods can provide relatively improved results for both rainfall and temperature variables. It should be noted that, according to the results obtained from the diverse topographic conditions of the sub-basins, the empirical quantiles (QUANT) and robust empirical quantiles (RQUANT) methods proved to be excellent options to correct the bias of rainfall data, while all bias correction methods, with the notable exceptions of performed PTF:scale and SSPLIN, performed relatively well for the temperature variable.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianqing Xue ◽  
Fan Yang ◽  
Changbing Yang ◽  
Guanghui Wei ◽  
Wenqian Li ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. K1-K4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiharu SHIIBA ◽  
Yasuto TACHIKAWA ◽  
Yutaka ICHIKAWA

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
阿加尔·恰肯 Ajar QAKEN ◽  
吾玛尔·阿布力孜 Omar ABLIZ ◽  
排孜力耶·合力力 Fazliya HELIL

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 6278-6281 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Yang ◽  
X. L He ◽  
J. F Li ◽  
C Wang ◽  
L. Q Xue ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 286 ◽  
pp. 116-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongbo Ling ◽  
Hailiang Xu ◽  
Jinyi Fu ◽  
Zili Fan ◽  
Xinwen Xu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document