Traffic Engineering and QoS in a Proposed MPLS-VPN

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ema-Maria Gales ◽  
Victor Croitoru
Keyword(s):  
Traffic Engineering ◽  
Mpls Vpn

scholarly journals Interoperability and Reliability of Multiplatform MPLS VPN: Comparison of Traffic Engineering with RSVP-TE Protocol and LDP Protocol

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Nanang Ismail ◽  
Eki Ahmad Zaki ◽  
Muhamad Arghifary
Keyword(s):  
Packet Loss ◽  
Traffic Engineering ◽  
Load Condition ◽  
Traffic Load ◽  
Average Delay ◽  
Traffic Condition ◽  
The Third ◽  
Mpls Vpn ◽  
Stable Network ◽  
Network Scalability

One of the alternatives to overcome network scalability problem and maintaining reliability is using MPLS VPN network. In reallity, the current network is already using a multiplatform of several different hardware vendors, i.e., Cisco and Juniper platforms. This paper discusses the comparison of the simulation results to see interoperability of multiplatform MPLS VPN andreliability through traffic engineering using RSVP-TE and LDP protocols. Both the RSVP and LDP protocols are tested on a stable network and in a recovery mode,as well as non-load conditions and with additional traffic load. The recovery mode is the condition after the failover due to termination of one of the links in the network. The no-load condition means that the network is not filled with additional traffic. There is only traffic from the measurement activity itself. While network conditions with an additional load are conditions where there is an additional UDP packet traffic load of 4.5 Mbps in addition to the measurement load itself. On a stable network and without additional traffic load, the average delay on LDP protocol is 59.41 ms, 2.06 ms jitter, 0.08% packetloss, and 8.99 Mbps throughput. Meanwhile, on RSVP protocol, the average delay is 52.40 ms, 2.39 ms jitter, 12.18% packet loss, and 7.80 Mbps throughput. When failover occurs and on recovery mode, LDP protocol is48% of packet loss per 100 sent packets while on RSVP packet loss percentage is 35.5% per 100 sent packets. Both protocols have interoperability on the third layer of multiplatform MPLS VPN, but on heavy loaded traffic condition, RSVP protocol has better reliability than the LDP protocol.

scholarly journals IMPLEMENTASI DAN ANALISA PERFORMANSI LAYANAN VPN PADA JARINGAN MPLS-TE MENGGUNAKAN PROTOKOL BGP DENGAN METODE QOS INTSERV

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 532
Author(s):  
Salsa Rizkiana ◽  
Doan Perdana ◽  
Ridha Negara
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Service ◽  
Traffic Engineering ◽  
Autonomous System ◽  
Ip Network ◽  
Mpls Vpn ◽  
End To End ◽  
Integrated Service

Fitur Traffic Engineering pada MPLS dapat melakukan perpindahan pada link trafik yang mengalami congestion, sehingga link dapat dipindahkan pada link yang kosong. Teknologi MPLS VPN-TE menjadi solusi untuk meningkatkan keamanan dan pemilihan rute terbaik dalam suatu jaringan. Integrated Service merupakan salah satu model QoS untuk masalah pengontrolan bandwidth end-to-end pada suatu jaringan yang diperlukan oleh teknologi MPLS VPN-TE untuk kestabilan jaringan. Open IMS Core merupakan server layanan multimedia yang digunakan pada teknologi MPLS VPN-TE dengan mempertimbangkan Quality Of Service pada layanan multimedia. Penggunaan protocol BGP merupakan jenis peroutingan yang dapat melakukan pertukaran informasi routing dengan memetakan tabel IP network antar Autonomous System (AS) dengan memberikan peningkatan QoS pada suatu jaringan.Pada Penelitian ini diimplementasikan teknologi MPLS VPN TE dengan menggunakan router mikrotik. Dari hasil pengujian menunjukan bahwa teknologi MPLS VPN dengan penambahan fitur Traffic Engineering didapatkan hasil perbaikan delay sebesar 27,44% untuk voip,11,14% untuk video call. Untuk parameter throughput mengalami perbaikan sebesar 6,02 % untuk voip, 56,6% untuk video call dan jitter mendapatkan hasil < 1 ms.

MPLS/VPN traffic engineering: SLA metrics

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Cherkaoui ◽  
Brenda MacGibbon ◽  
Michel Blais ◽  
Ahmed Serhrouchni
Keyword(s):  
Traffic Engineering ◽  
Mpls Vpn

INTRODUCTION TO RISK AND SAFETY OF AIR NAVIGATION

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fedja Netjasov
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Students ◽  
Traffic Engineering ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Air Transport ◽  
Civil Aviation ◽  
Undergraduate Studies ◽  
Recommended Practices ◽  
The University ◽  
Navigation Safety

"Introduction to Risk and Safety of Air Navigation" is an authorized script compiled on the basis of the curriculum of the course "Introduction to Risk and Safety of Air Navigation" which is taught in undergraduate studies at the University of Belgrade - Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering. The scripts are primarily intended for students of undergraduate (bachelor) studies at the Department of Air Transport and Traffic at the University of Belgrade - Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering. Scripts can be useful to both master's and doctoral students at the University of Belgrade - Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, especially those who have not completed undergraduate studies at the Department of Air Transport and Traffic. They can also be useful to air transport and aeronautical engineers in order to expand and update knowledge in the field of air navigation safety. The material presented in these scripts relates mainly to civil aviation and is largely based on international standards, recommended practices, regulations and documents which deal with issues related to air navigation safety. As these standards, regulations and documents are subject to frequent changes and alterations, users of these scripts are advised to also use the original (updated) documents, which are listed in the references, in order to take into account any changes that have occurred after the release of the scripts.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document