Error quantification for the design of a TCR-type passive calibrator for SAR applications

Author(s):  
Ana Guisao-Betancur ◽  
Jose Rendon-Arredondo ◽  
Alejandro Marulanda-Tobon
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Jose Enrique Bernardo ◽  
Benjamin Havrilesko ◽  
Matthew J. LeVine ◽  
Michelle Kirby ◽  
Dimitri N. Mavris

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 320-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Guerrero ◽  
Pedro Galindo ◽  
Andrés Yáñez ◽  
Teresa Ben ◽  
Sergio I. Molina

In this article a method for determining errors of the strain values when applying strain mapping techniques has been devised. This methodology starts with the generation of a thickness/defocus series of simulated high-resolution transmission electron microscopy images of InAsxP1−x/InP heterostructures and the application of geometric phase. To obtain optimal defocusing conditions, a comparison of different defocus values is carried out by the calculation of the strain profile standard deviations among different specimen thicknesses. Finally, based on the analogy of real state strain to a step response, a characterization of strain mapping error near an interface is proposed.


Author(s):  
Christian Schwaferts ◽  
Patrick Schwaferts ◽  
Elisabeth von der Esch ◽  
Martin Elsner ◽  
Natalia P. Ivleva

AbstractMicro- and nanoplastic contamination is becoming a growing concern for environmental protection and food safety. Therefore, analytical techniques need to produce reliable quantification to ensure proper risk assessment. Raman microspectroscopy (RM) offers identification of single particles, but to ensure that the results are reliable, a certain number of particles has to be analyzed. For larger MP, all particles on the Raman filter can be detected, errors can be quantified, and the minimal sample size can be calculated easily by random sampling. In contrast, very small particles might not all be detected, demanding a window-based analysis of the filter. A bootstrap method is presented to provide an error quantification with confidence intervals from the available window data. In this context, different window selection schemes are evaluated and there is a clear recommendation to employ random (rather than systematically placed) window locations with many small rather than few larger windows. Ultimately, these results are united in a proposed RM measurement algorithm that computes confidence intervals on-the-fly during the analysis and, by checking whether given precision requirements are already met, automatically stops if an appropriate number of particles are identified, thus improving efficiency.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lautaro Cilenti ◽  
Akobuije Chijoke ◽  
Nicholas Vlajic ◽  
Balakumar Balachandran

2008 ◽  
Vol 152 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 101-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markos A. Katsoulakis ◽  
Petr Plecháč ◽  
Luc Rey-Bellet ◽  
Dimitrios K. Tsagkarogiannis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document