Towards Collaborative Editing of Structured Data on Mobile Devices

Author(s):  
Nicholas Palmer ◽  
Emilian Miron ◽  
Roelof Kemp ◽  
Thilo Kielmann ◽  
Henri Bal
Author(s):  
Nadir Guetmi ◽  
Abdessamad Imine

Mobile devices have experienced a huge progress in the capacity of computing, storage and data visualization. They are becoming the device of choice for operating a large variety of applications while supporting real-time collaboration of people and their mobility. Despite this progress, the energy consumption and the network coverage remain a serious problem against an efficient and continuous use of these mobile collaborative applications and a great challenge for their designers and developers. To address these issues, this chapter describes design patterns that help modelling mobile collaborative applications to support collaboration through the cloud. Two levels are presented: the first level provides self-control to create clones of mobile devices, manage users' groups and recover failed clones in the cloud. The second level supports group collaboration mechanisms in real-time. These design patterns have been used as a basis for the design of a mobile collaborative editing application.


Author(s):  
Kerry Shih-Ping Chang ◽  
Brad A. Myers ◽  
Gene M. Cahill ◽  
Soumya Simanta ◽  
Edwin Morris ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 33 (05) ◽  
pp. 454-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. van Ginneken ◽  
J. van der Lei ◽  
J. H. van Bemmel ◽  
P. W. Moorman

Abstract:Clinical narratives in patient records are usually recorded in free text, limiting the use of this information for research, quality assessment, and decision support. This study focuses on the capture of clinical narratives in a structured format by supporting physicians with structured data entry (SDE). We analyzed and made explicit which requirements SDE should meet to be acceptable for the physician on the one hand, and generate unambiguous patient data on the other. Starting from these requirements, we found that in order to support SDE, the knowledge on which it is based needs to be made explicit: we refer to this knowledge as descriptional knowledge. We articulate the nature of this knowledge, and propose a model in which it can be formally represented. The model allows the construction of specific knowledge bases, each representing the knowledge needed to support SDE within a circumscribed domain. Data entry is made possible through a general entry program, of which the behavior is determined by a combination of user input and the content of the applicable domain knowledge base. We clarify how descriptional knowledge is represented, modeled, and used for data entry to achieve SDE, which meets the proposed requirements.


1992 ◽  
Vol 31 (04) ◽  
pp. 268-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Gaus ◽  
J. G. Wechsler ◽  
P. Janowitz ◽  
J. Tudyka ◽  
W. Kratzer ◽  
...  

Abstract:A system using structured reporting of findings was developed for the preparation of medical reports and for clinical documentation purposes in upper abdominal sonography, and evaluated in the course of routine use. The evaluation focussed on the following parameters: completeness and correctness of the entered data, the proportion of free text, the validity and objectivity of the documentation, user acceptance, and time required. The completeness in the case of two clinically relevant parameters could be compared with an already existing database containing freely dictated reports. The results confirmed the hypothesis that, for the description of results of a technical examination, structured data reporting is a viable alternative to free-text dictation. For the application evaluated, there is even evidence of the superiority of a structured approach. The system can be put to use in related areas of application.


1996 ◽  
Vol 35 (03) ◽  
pp. 261-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Schromm ◽  
T. Frankewitsch ◽  
M. Giehl ◽  
F. Keller ◽  
D. Zellner

Abstract:A pharmacokinetic database was constructed that is as free of errors as possible. Pharmacokinetic parameters were derived from the literature using a text-processing system and a database system. A random data sample from each system was compared with the original literature. The estimated error frequencies using statistical methods differed significantly between the two systems. The estimated error frequency in the text-processing system was 7.2%, that in the database system 2.7%. Compared with the original values in the literature, the estimated probability of error for identical pharmacokinetic parameters recorded in both systems is 2.4% and is not significantly different from the error frequency in the database. Parallel data entry with a text-processing system and a database system is, therefore, not significantly better than structured data entry for reducing the error frequency.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document