Pioneering in Asia With the US Venture Capital Model

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 52-55
Author(s):  
Erik Jan Marinissen
Keyword(s):  
2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 672-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas P Lee ◽  
Mark D Dibner
Keyword(s):  

1969 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
David J Dykeman ◽  
Danielle T Abramson

As a result of the global recession that began in 2008, life sciences companies face a groundswell of new business and regulatory pressures that includes health care and patent reform, increased pricing pressures, and diluted markets. Bringing new products from discovery to market is becoming more expensive and unpredictable. In the pharmaceutical sector, some predict that the age of the blockbuster drug has ended as generics present a growing threat to the pharmaceutical giants. Further, with a large number of key patent expirations looming through 2014, analysts expect that large pharmaceutical companies will lose over US$150 billion of revenues of brand name drugs.In response to declining sales and rising R&D costs, the life sciences industry is pursuing new market opportunities by expanding beyond the developed markets of the United States, Europe and Japan, and into emerging markets such as China and India. Despite market uncertainties, however, venture capital funding in the life sciences sector (including pharmaceuticals and medical devices) is on the rise with $2.1 billion going into 206 deals during the second quarter of 201l, an increase of 37 per cent in dollars and 12 per cent in deal volume. To survive – and thrive – in these tumultuous times, both large and small life sciences companies face pressure to develop new products and technological advancements.Patents are pivotal to the life sciences industry. In order to succeed, life sciences companies must distinguish themselves from their competitors through their intellectual property portfolios. A successful patent portfolio represents a well-reasoned business strategy, where each patent is a single strategic building block in a larger portfolio that reflects present and future business objectives. A strong patent portfolio is also important in the current life sciences investment climate, where venture capital funding is often dependent on whether a company has secured its intellectual property assets, thereby validating a company's technology and demonstrating its commercial potential. Although building and maintaining a strong patent portfolio is important for all life sciences companies, it is most critical for early-stage companies. Patent portfolios are often the driving force for major events in the life cycle of a life sciences company, including mergers and acquisitions, public offerings, venture capital investment, strategic collaborations, joint ventures and litigation.As a result of recent measures taken by the US Congress, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the US Supreme Court to reform the current US patent system, life sciences companies must respond with strong patent strategies that address these reforms without sacrificing the company's competitive edge in the marketplace. Such comprehensive technology strategies must maximize patent coverage of a company's current core technology and future improvements, monitor the patent landscape and explore ways to patent white space, and consider cross-licensing opportunities with competitors. With these strategies in place, life sciences companies can withstand patent reform and ensure their success in today's competitive and rapidly evolving global commercialization landscape.


2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (9) ◽  
pp. 1188-1199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christos Kolympiris ◽  
Nicholas Kalaitzandonakes ◽  
Douglas Miller

Author(s):  
Adam Mazurkiewicz ◽  
Rozalia Sitkowska

Tendencies concerning innovativeness changes in selected sectors of the Polish economy were identified in the paper. The trends were depicted against the background of the USA, Japan and the EU-15 and they comprised: public and business financing of the R&D area with reference to GDP, R&D expenditure per capita, and venture capital funds supporting innovations commercialization. The observed correlation between the financing level of the R&D area and the innovativeness level of the US economy made the basis for the analysis conducted. The analysis concentrated on trends occurring in the Polish economy in the context of industry innovativeness, in particular processing industry, including the sector of investment goods. Conclusions resulting from the analysis of innovation commercialization processes with venture capital funds were presented. Countermeasures which were taken in Poland to prevent the marginalization of financing the R&D area were demonstrated as well.


10.5912/jcb87 ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M S Fazeli

The biotech sector had a sizzling year last year, raising US$19bn in cash globally. This paper looks at the performance of the biotechnology sector on both sides of the Atlantic in terms of financing activity. Financing activity in the European biotechnology industry is still a long way off from the USA, with public fundraising only reaching the level that the USA had in 1997 and venture capital financings getting close to the US levels of 1994–95. This suggests that at least another five to eight years is needed before there is even a chance to get near where the USA is today. However, the sheer size of the US equity capital market and its liberal attitude to fundraisings and higher-risk appetite is likely to mean that European biotechs will never catch up with the USA, even if our science (across the whole of Europe) is as good. This does not mean that Europe cannot have a thriving biotechnology industry. Indeed, the current level of activity in the venture capital and public markets suggests that Europe is only just getting serious on biotechnology.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document