Motion Planning for Mobile Robots: A Method for the Selection of a Combination of Motion-Planning Algorithms

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 107-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.J.M. Lunenburg ◽  
S.A.M. Coenen ◽  
G.J.L. Naus ◽  
M.J.G. van de Molengraft ◽  
M. Steinbuch
Author(s):  
Edvards Valbahs ◽  
Peter Grabusts

In order to achieve the wide range of the robotic application it is necessary to provide iterative motions among points of the goals. For instance, in the industry mobile robots can replace any components between a storehouse and an assembly department. Ammunition replacement is widely used in military services. Working place is possible in ports, airports, waste site and etc. Mobile agents can be used for monitoring if it is necessary to observe control points in the secret place. The paper deals with path planning programme for mobile robots. The aim of the research paper is to analyse motion-planning algorithms that contain the design of modelling programme. The programme is needed as environment modelling to obtain the simulation data. The simulation data give the possibility to conduct the wide analyses for selected algorithm. Analysis means the simulation data interpretation and comparison with other data obtained using the motion-planning. The results of the careful analysis were considered for optimal path planning algorithms. The experimental evidence was proposed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm for steady covered space. The results described in this work can be extended in a number of directions, and applied to other algorithms.


Author(s):  
Thomas Fridolin Iversen ◽  
Lars-Peter Ellekilde

Purpose For robot motion planning there exists a large number of different algorithms, each appropriate for a certain domain, and the right choice of planner depends on the specific use case. The purpose of this paper is to consider the application of bin picking and benchmark a set of motion planning algorithms to identify which are most suited in the given context. Design/methodology/approach The paper presents a selection of motion planning algorithms and defines benchmarks based on three different bin-picking scenarios. The evaluation is done based on a fixed set of tasks, which are planned and executed on a real and a simulated robot. Findings The benchmarking shows a clear difference between the planners and generally indicates that algorithms integrating optimization, despite longer planning time, perform better due to a faster execution. Originality/value The originality of this work lies in the selected set of planners and the specific choice of application. Most new planners are only compared to existing methods for specific applications chosen to demonstrate the advantages. However, with the specifics of another application, such as bin picking, it is not obvious which planner to choose.


Robotics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Yankai Wang ◽  
Qiaoling Du ◽  
Tianhe Zhang ◽  
Chengze Xue

Hybrid mobile robots with two motion modes of a wheeled vehicle and truss structure with the ability to climb poles have significant flexibility. The motion planning of this kind of robot on a pole has been widely studied, but few studies have focused on the transition of the robot from the ground to the pole. In this study, a locomotion strategy of wheeled-legged pole-climbing robots (the WL_PCR) is proposed to solve the problem of ground-to-pole transition. By analyzing the force of static and dynamic process in the ground-to-pole transition, the condition of torque provided by the gripper and moving joint is proposed. The mathematical expression of Centre of Mass (CoM) of the wheeled-legged pole-climbing robots is utilized, and the conditions for the robot to smoothly transition from the ground to the vertical pole are proposed. Finally, the feasibility of this method is proved by the simulation and experimentation of a locomotion strategy on wheeled-legged pole-climbing robots.


Robotics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 20 ◽  
Author(s):  
A poorva ◽  
Rahul Gautam ◽  
Rahul Kala

2002 ◽  
Vol 68 (665) ◽  
pp. 165-172
Author(s):  
Atsushi YAMASHITA ◽  
Masaki FUKUCHI ◽  
Jun OTA ◽  
Tamio ARAI ◽  
Hajime ASAMA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuehao Sun ◽  
Shuchao Deng ◽  
Baohong Tong ◽  
Shuang Wang ◽  
Shuai Ma ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document