An optimal algorithm of aircraft flight simulator control

Author(s):  
V.N. Azarskov ◽  
O.V. Ermolaeva ◽  
A.U. Kurganskyi ◽  
G.I. Rudyuk
2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-32
Author(s):  
Sławomir Romaniuk ◽  
Zdzisław Gosiewski ◽  
Leszek Ambroziak

Abstract In the paper implementation of a ground control station for UAV flight simulator is shown. The ground control station software is in cooperation with flight simulator, displaying various aircraft flight parameters. The software is programmed in C++ language and utilizes the windows forms for implementing graphical content. One of the main aims of the design of the application was to simplify the interface, simultaneously maintaining the functionality and the eligibility. A mission can be planned and monitored using the implemented map control supported by waypoint list.


2007 ◽  
Vol 10-12 ◽  
pp. 522-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pan Guo Qi ◽  
D.C. Cong ◽  
H.J. Jiang ◽  
Jun Wei Han

Flight simulator is a complex man-in-the-loop (MIL) simulation system. With several decades of development, it has already become important tools of aircraft design and development, and necessary means of pilot training. And simulation credibility and reliability of the flight simulator have been considerably improved in comparison with the past. However, the system of flight simulator has become increasingly complex and difficult to be described clearly. This paper presents the concepts of conceptual layer and achieving layer, analyzes the composition and principle of the commercial aircraft flight simulator for pilot training from the two layers, describes the system architecture in detail. According to the system architecture, three aspects are very important to develop the flight simulator, the first is the fidelity of the simulation models, the second is the performance of cueing devices, and the last are the computing capacity of the host computers and the time delay over the communication networks.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas P. Ratvasky ◽  
Kurt Blankenship ◽  
William Rieke ◽  
David J. Brinker

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-138
Author(s):  
Muhammad Tahir ◽  
Rabia Noor Enam ◽  
Syed Muhammad Nabeel Mustafa ◽  
Rehan Qureshi

For training young pilots. Flight simulators enhance the safety measures, as the risk factor of severe injuries are eliminated since the training is now synthetic. However, flight simulators also require large space, large budget and does have many high end requirements, which are to be met in order to make the simulator respond and perform identical to that of a real aircraft. Flight simulators does have their hardware constraints and because of these limitations, the simulators are not of generic nature that supports different sort of aircrafts. In this paper, the simulator environment is deployed in virtual reality to simulate the similar controls on a stereoscopic environment. Deployment of the simulator is such, that experience of flying an aircraft from cockpit will give a sensational view to the user. Virtual reality is used in learning purpose, as normal person can experience what it will be like, to fly an aircraft


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-111
Author(s):  
Andrey K. Babin ◽  
Andrew R. Dattel ◽  
Margaret F. Klemm

Abstract. Twin-engine propeller aircraft accidents occur due to mechanical reasons as well as human error, such as misidentifying a failed engine. This paper proposes a visual indicator as an alternative method to the dead leg–dead engine procedure to identify a failed engine. In total, 50 pilots without a multi-engine rating were randomly assigned to a traditional (dead leg–dead engine) or an alternative (visual indicator) group. Participants performed three takeoffs in a flight simulator with a simulated engine failure after rotation. Participants in the alternative group identified the failed engine faster than the traditional group. A visual indicator may improve pilot accuracy and performance during engine-out emergencies and is recommended as a possible alternative for twin-engine propeller aircraft.


Author(s):  
George H. Buckland ◽  
Eric G. Monroe ◽  
Kent I. Mehrer
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document