A study of proton activation tracer for real-time dose monitoring in radiotherapy

Author(s):  
T. P. Lou ◽  
L. Mihailescu
2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. 395-398
Author(s):  
Yong Seok Hwang ◽  
Maengjun Kim ◽  
Jaekwon Suk ◽  
Chan Young Lee ◽  
Jun Mok Ha ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Xu ◽  
Li Yang ◽  
Tim Hui ◽  
Xiaoqin Jiang ◽  
Jeff chan ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and purpose: To introduce a standard linac with true attachment free, rapid arc and dose-drop scheme for positioning related dose deviation control based total body irradiation(TBI).Materials/Methods: One eight years old girl diagnosed with acute lymphocytic leukemia underwent TBI in 2020. Target volumes and organs at risk were contoured after CT simulation. Total sixteen ARC and four AP-PA from five isocenters were designed. A dose-drop scheme on both sides of adjacent region were performed to reduce positioning-related dose deviation. A series of quality assurance before radiotherapy and real-time dose monitoring during radiotherapy were carried out.Results: The average on board imaging (OBI) time of per fraction was 40.3 min, the average beam on time of per fraction was 37.2 min, the average time to change from head first to feet first position was 18.4 min. The average mean lung dose was 9.89 Gy, the maximum lens dose was 7.60 Gy, the mean PTV_total dose was 12.17Gy, 98.23% PTV_total volume was covered by 90% of the prescription dose. The maximum dose (Dmax) of PTV_total was 13.65Gy. Dmean and V10.8 of PTV_total are only slightly different(0.49% - 1.89% and 0.26% - 1.04% respectively) even with an error of 5 - 20mm longitudinal misalignments. Gamma passing rate(3mm/ 3% Gamma criteria) are between 93.5% and 100%. Real-time dose monitoring showed an overall deviation of -3.9%±5.51%.Conclusions: Standard linac, rapid arc and dose-drop for positioning-related dose deviation control based total body irradiation is feasible, accurate, and reliable. It is worthy of clinical application.


2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (12) ◽  
pp. 7194-7204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neelam Tyagi ◽  
Kai Yang ◽  
David Gersten ◽  
Di Yan

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (6Part36) ◽  
pp. 3649-3650
Author(s):  
O Volotskova ◽  
C Jenkins ◽  
B Fahimian ◽  
L Xing

Author(s):  
Marcus Christian Müller ◽  
Michael Windemuth ◽  
Sophie Frege ◽  
Eva Nadine Striepens

Background: Chronic exposure to occupational ionising radiation is seen as one reason for elevated cancer prevalence. </P><P> Objective: The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate radiation exposure of anaesthetists by real-time dosimetry. Methods: Data of 296 patients were analyzed. Ten types of trauma operation procedures including osteosynthesis of upper and lower extremity fractures and minimally invasive stabilisation of traumatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures were accomplished. Evaluation was performed by an occupational dosimetry system, which visualises anaesthetists radiation exposure feedback compared to surgeons in real-time. Results: A significantly lower radiation exposure to anaesthetists compared to surgeons was observed in four types of operative procedures: Plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures, osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures, stabilisation of traumatic and osteoporotic vertebral fractures. In four types of operations (plate osteosynthesis of proximal humeral, distal radial and tibial fractures and intramedullary nailing of the clavicle), anaesthetists` amount of radiation exceeded one-third of the surgeons' exposure, especially if the C-arm tube was positioned close to the anaesthetists work station at the patients' head. Conclusion: By using the occupational radiation dose monitoring system, radiation exposure to anaesthetists was visualised in real-time during trauma operations. Radiation exposure of anaesthetists depends on the type of operation and the position of the C-arm. The system may help to increase anaesthetists` awareness concerning radiation exposure and to enhance compliance in using radiation protection techniques.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 4738-4748 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon Skouboe ◽  
Per Rugaard Poulsen ◽  
Casper Gammelmark Muurholm ◽  
Esben Worm ◽  
Rune Hansen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document