scholarly journals Power Scaling Laws and Near-Field Behaviors of Massive MIMO and Intelligent Reflecting Surfaces

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 1306-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emil Bjornson ◽  
Luca Sanguinetti
IEEE Access ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 40860-40882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Si-Nian Jin ◽  
Dian-Wu Yue ◽  
Ha H. Nguyen

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prem Singh ◽  
Himanshu B. Mishra ◽  
Aditya K. Jagannatham ◽  
K. Vasudevan ◽  
Lajos Hanzo

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1619-1625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuesong Liang ◽  
Shi Jin ◽  
Kai-Kit Wong ◽  
Tao Hong ◽  
Hongbo Zhu

2021 ◽  
pp. 204141962199349
Author(s):  
Jordan J Pannell ◽  
George Panoutsos ◽  
Sam B Cooke ◽  
Dan J Pope ◽  
Sam E Rigby

Accurate quantification of the blast load arising from detonation of a high explosive has applications in transport security, infrastructure assessment and defence. In order to design efficient and safe protective systems in such aggressive environments, it is of critical importance to understand the magnitude and distribution of loading on a structural component located close to an explosive charge. In particular, peak specific impulse is the primary parameter that governs structural deformation under short-duration loading. Within this so-called extreme near-field region, existing semi-empirical methods are known to be inaccurate, and high-fidelity numerical schemes are generally hampered by a lack of available experimental validation data. As such, the blast protection community is not currently equipped with a satisfactory fast-running tool for load prediction in the near-field. In this article, a validated computational model is used to develop a suite of numerical near-field blast load distributions, which are shown to follow a similar normalised shape. This forms the basis of the data-driven predictive model developed herein: a Gaussian function is fit to the normalised loading distributions, and a power law is used to calculate the magnitude of the curve according to established scaling laws. The predictive method is rigorously assessed against the existing numerical dataset, and is validated against new test models and available experimental data. High levels of agreement are demonstrated throughout, with typical variations of <5% between experiment/model and prediction. The new approach presented in this article allows the analyst to rapidly compute the distribution of specific impulse across the loaded face of a wide range of target sizes and near-field scaled distances and provides a benchmark for data-driven modelling approaches to capture blast loading phenomena in more complex scenarios.


2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1014-1017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Zhu ◽  
Wei Xu
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 1617-1627 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Y. Babeyko ◽  
A. Hoechner ◽  
S. V. Sobolev

Abstract. We present the GITEWS approach to source modeling for the tsunami early warning in Indonesia. Near-field tsunami implies special requirements to both warning time and details of source characterization. To meet these requirements, we employ geophysical and geological information to predefine a maximum number of rupture parameters. We discretize the tsunamigenic Sunda plate interface into an ordered grid of patches (150×25) and employ the concept of Green's functions for forward and inverse rupture modeling. Rupture Generator, a forward modeling tool, additionally employs different scaling laws and slip shape functions to construct physically reasonable source models using basic seismic information only (magnitude and epicenter location). GITEWS runs a library of semi- and fully-synthetic scenarios to be extensively employed by system testing as well as by warning center personnel teaching and training. Near real-time GPS observations are a very valuable complement to the local tsunami warning system. Their inversion provides quick (within a few minutes on an event) estimation of the earthquake magnitude, rupture position and, in case of sufficient station coverage, details of slip distribution.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 3177-3191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Guo ◽  
Weile Zhang ◽  
Pengcheng Mu ◽  
Feifei Gao ◽  
Hai Lin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document