scholarly journals Electromagnetic Analysis and Performance Comparison of Fully 3D-printed Antennas

Author(s):  
R. Colella ◽  
F. Chietera ◽  
L. Catarinucci ◽  
A. Casula ◽  
G. Montisci ◽  
...  
IEEE Access ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 64261-64269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaker Alkaraki ◽  
Yue Gao ◽  
Max O. Munoz Torrico ◽  
Samuel Stremsdoerfer ◽  
Edouard Gayets ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Dmitry Filonov ◽  
Sergey Kolen ◽  
Andrey Shmidt ◽  
Yosi Shacham‐Diamand ◽  
Amir Boag ◽  
...  

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 134245-134255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivek T. Bharambe ◽  
Jinwoo Ma ◽  
Michael D. Dickey ◽  
Jacob J. Adams

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 39378-39389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerry Johnson ◽  
Michael Zemba ◽  
Brett P. Conner ◽  
Jason Walker ◽  
Edward Burden ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 29-44
Author(s):  
Ramin Soltanzadeh ◽  
Elnaz Afsharipour ◽  
Neda Anssari ◽  
Behzad Mansouri ◽  
Cyrus Shafai

Aim: This study is aimed to compare the structure and performance of 3D-printed and microfabricated microneedle arrays (MNAs). Materials & methods: MNAs were produced using either stereolithography printing or were micro-fabricated using SU-8 polymer. The structure of both MNA types were tested and compared through scanning electron microscopy. MNA performance was also evaluated through electrical impedence spectroscopy and nerve conduction velocity testing. Results & conclusion: The 3D-printed MNAs were shown to have higher gain than microfabricated MNAs at high frequencies. However, the selectivity of the microfabricated MNAs is more than 3D-printed MNAs. Scanning electron microscopy image comparison also showed significant differences between the output of the 3D-printed MNAs and the microfabricated MNAs. It was understood that the microfabricated MNAs’ geometries are closer to the primary design than the 3D-printed MNAs.


Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Francesco Paolo Chietera ◽  
Riccardo Colella ◽  
Luca Catarinucci

One of the most promising and exciting research fields of the last decade is that of 3D-printed antennas, as proven by the increasing number of related scientific papers. More specifically, the most common and cost-effective 3D printing technologies, which have become more and more widespread in recent years, are particularly suitable for the development of dielectric resonator antennas (DRAs), which are very interesting types of antennas exhibiting good gain, excellent efficiency, and potentially very small size. After a brief survey on how additive manufacturing (AM) can be used in 3D printing of antennas and how much the manufacturing process of DRAs can benefit from those technologies, a specific example, consisting of a wideband antenna operating at 2.4 GHz and 3.8 GHz, was deeply analyzed, realized, and tested. The obtained prototype exhibited compact size (60 × 60 × 16 mm3, considering the whole antenna) and a good agreement between measured and simulated S11, with a fractional bandwidth of 46%. Simulated gain and efficiency were also quite good, with values of 5.45 dBi and 6.38 dBi for the gain and 91% and 90% for the efficiency, respectively, at 2.45 GHz and 3.6 GHz.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document