A new life cycle cost model of power transformer and its comprehensive sensitivity analysis

Author(s):  
Qiao Guo-Hua ◽  
Ren Zheng ◽  
Su Lei ◽  
Zhang Bo ◽  
Xing Jian-Gang ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 278
Author(s):  
HAP Audu ◽  
EE Oghorodje ◽  
DE Oviri

2012 ◽  
Vol 241-244 ◽  
pp. 591-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Hu ◽  
Kai Li ◽  
Rui Ma

Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Management is not only an advanced management concept but also an effective way to achieve the integration of high-efficacy and low-cost assets. In the meantime, the State Grid Corporation promotes the “Large Five” system that novel environment provides new opportunities and challenges to the life cycle cost management. Therefore, this paper puts forward a transformer cycle cost model which adapts to the new environment, combining with new features of the “Large Five” system construction, basing on the whole life cycle cost theory and according to the actual operation of the transformer. It also analyzes the cost composition of transformer’s life cycle and verifies the validity of the transformer cycle cost model which has been put forward in this paper through calculating examples.


1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-56
Author(s):  
Virginia C. Day ◽  
Zachary F. Lansdowne ◽  
Richard A Moynihan ◽  
John A. Vitkevich

1994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bonnie J. LaFleur ◽  
Jennifer A. Jaeger ◽  
Lawrence A. Hermansen

2015 ◽  
Vol 74 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ooi Chu Hui ◽  
Abdul Hakim Mohammed

This paper highlights the basic process of developing a life cycle cost model and the role of cost breakdown structure for water distribution pipeline networks. A life cycle cost is the total cost of owning an asset during its predicted useful life, while a cost breakdown structure illustrates all the costs emerged in each single phase of the asset’s life cycle cost. Its purpose is to identify, define and organize all cost elements to be taken into account in a life cycle cost. Each cost element included in developing a cost breakdown structure will also be discussed in this paper.


2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto B. Calvo ◽  
Alexander J. Danish ◽  
David Marcus

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (16) ◽  
pp. 6584
Author(s):  
Jingjing Jia ◽  
Shujie Ma ◽  
Yixi Xue ◽  
Deyang Kong

Electric carsharing (ECS) is a potential option to address the problem of unsustainability in the transportation sector. The business-to-consumer model of ECS, which is one of several different electric carsharing models, has gained much popularity in recent years. Generating sufficient revenue to cover costs is a critical factor for ECS companies to maintain healthy development. This study makes an economic analysis, on the basis of life-cycle cost and monetary revenue associated with the operation of ECS, of two Chinese ECS companies: EVCARD and LCCS. Based on data gathered by field investigation, this study aims to determine the break-even moment for each company’s main vehicle models by means of the net present value method. The results show that EVCARD achieved an earlier break-even moment than LCCS. The break-even moment of Chery eQ of EVCARD was the shortest of all the vehicle models, at only 181.3 min. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to portray how different cost-related and revenue-related factors influence the break-even moment. Our findings indicate that a wide difference exists in terms of the influence of different factors on the break-even moment. Among these, the manufacturer’s suggested retail price is the most influential variable, followed by the unit rental price. The reaction of the break-even moment to the market price of a charging pile and the non-rental revenue per vehicle—especially the latter—was found to be negligible in the sensitivity analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document