scholarly journals Model Predictive Control for Vehicle Guidance in Presence of Sliding: Application to Farm Vehicles Path Tracking

Author(s):  
R. Lenain ◽  
B. Thuilot ◽  
C. Cariou ◽  
P. Martinet
IEEE Access ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 128233-128249
Author(s):  
Mohammad Rokonuzzaman ◽  
Navid Mohajer ◽  
Saeid Nahavandi ◽  
Shady Mohamed

2020 ◽  
Vol 56 (10) ◽  
pp. 490-493
Author(s):  
Guoxing Bai ◽  
Yu Meng ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
Weidong Luo ◽  
Qing Gu ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 569-577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Mata ◽  
Asier Zubizarreta ◽  
Charles Pinto

Electronics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guoxing Bai ◽  
Yu Meng ◽  
Li Liu ◽  
Weidong Luo ◽  
Qing Gu ◽  
...  

Recently, model predictive control (MPC) is increasingly applied to path tracking of mobile devices, such as mobile robots. The characteristics of these MPC-based controllers are not identical due to the different approaches taken during design. According to the differences in the prediction models, we believe that the existing MPC-based path tracking controllers can be divided into four categories. We named them linear model predictive control (LMPC), linear error model predictive control (LEMPC), nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC), and nonlinear error model predictive control (NEMPC). Subsequently, we built these four controllers for the same mobile robot and compared them. By comparison, we got some conclusions. The real-time performance of LMPC and LEMPC is good, but they are less robust to reference paths and positioning errors. NMPC performs well when the reference velocity is high and the radius of the reference path is small. It is also robust to positioning errors. However, the real-time performance of NMPC is slightly worse. NEMPC has many disadvantages. Like LMPC and LEMPC, it performs poorly when the reference velocity is high and the radius of the reference path is small. Its real-time performance is also not good enough.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document