Bearing defect detection using on-board accelerometer measurements

Author(s):  
J. Donelson ◽  
R.L. Dicus
2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
X. Chiementin ◽  
D. Mba ◽  
B. Charnley ◽  
S. Lignon ◽  
J. P. Dron

The acoustic emission (AE) technology is growing in its applicability to bearing defect diagnosis. Several publications have shown its effectiveness for earlier detection of bearing defects than vibration analysis. In the latter instance, detection and monitoring of defects can be achieved through temporal statistical indicators, which can further be improved by application of denoising techniques. This paper investigates the application of temporal statistical indicators for AE detection of bearing defects on a purposely built test-rig and assesses the effectiveness of various denoising techniques in improving sensitivity to early defect detection. It is concluded that the denoising methods offer significant improvements in identifying defects with AE, especially the self-adaptive noise cancellation method.


2021 ◽  
Vol 09 (11) ◽  
pp. 2927-2935
Author(s):  
Di Wu ◽  
Jinlong Sun ◽  
Zhifeng Liu ◽  
Ziqian Zhang ◽  
Min Huang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ruqiang Yan ◽  
Robert X. Gao

This paper presents a new signal processing technique for bearing defect detection, called Multi-Scale Enveloping Spectrogram (MUSENS). The technique decomposes vibration signals measured on rolling bearings into different scales by means of a continuous wavelet transform (CWT). The envelope signal in each scale is then calculated from the modulus of the wavelet coefficients. Subsequently, Fourier transform is performed repetitively on the envelope of the signal at each scale, resulting in an “envelop spectrum” of the original signal at the various scales. The final output is a three-dimensional scale-frequency map that indicates the intensity and location of the defect-related frequency lines.


2004 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 740-745 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian T. Holm-Hansen ◽  
Robert X. Gao ◽  
Li Zhang

This paper presents a new, structural dynamics-based wavelet transformation technique for bearing defect detection. Specifically, a customized wavelet was developed analytically, using the scaling function derived from the actual impulse response of a ball bearing. Experiments under various loading conditions have confirmed that the customized wavelet provides a better match to the defect-induced signals of the bearing than a standard wavelet commonly used in the literature and is, thus, more effective in detecting bearing structural defects.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Jianqiao Xu ◽  
Zhaolu Zuo ◽  
Danchao Wu ◽  
Bing Li ◽  
Xiaoni Li ◽  
...  

Bearings always suffer from surface defects, such as scratches, black spots, and pits. Those surface defects have great effects on the quality and service life of bearings. Therefore, the defect detection of the bearing has always been the focus of the bearing quality control. Deep learning has been successfully applied to the objection detection due to its excellent performance. However, it is difficult to realize automatic detection of bearing surface defects based on data-driven-based deep learning due to few samples data of bearing defects on the actual production line. Sample preprocessing algorithm based on normalized sample symmetry of bearing is adopted to greatly increase the number of samples. Two different convolutional neural networks, supervised networks and unsupervised networks, are tested separately for the bearing defect detection. The first experiment adopts the supervised networks, and ResNet neural networks are selected as the supervised networks in this experiment. The experiment result shows that the AUC of the model is 0.8567, which is low for the actual use. Also, the positive and negative samples should be labelled manually. To improve the AUC of the model and the flexibility of the samples labelling, a new unsupervised neural network based on autoencoder networks is proposed. Gradients of the unlabeled data are used as labels, and autoencoder networks are created with U-net to predict the output. In the second experiment, positive samples of the supervised experiment are used as the training set. The experiment of the unsupervised neural networks shows that the AUC of the model is 0.9721. In this experiment, the AUC is higher than the first experiment, but the positive samples must be selected. To overcome this shortage, the dataset of the third experiment is the same as the supervised experiment, where all the positive and negative samples are mixed together, which means that there is no need to label the samples. This experiment shows that the AUC of the model is 0.9623. Although the AUC is slightly lower than that of the second experiment, the AUC is high enough for actual use. The experiment results demonstrate the feasibility and superiority of the proposed unsupervised networks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document