Localization of Hypervelocity Impact- Engendered Damage In Stiffened Curved Structures Using In-Situ Acoustic Emission

Author(s):  
Ye-fei HUANG ◽  
Wu-xiong CAO ◽  
Bao-jun PANG ◽  
Run-qiang CHI ◽  
Yuan CAI
2012 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1069-1074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuharu Shiwa ◽  
Hiroyuki Masuda ◽  
Hisashi Yamawaki ◽  
Kaita Ito ◽  
Manabu Enoki

2011 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Lamberson ◽  
V. Eliasson ◽  
A. J. Rosakis

2021 ◽  
pp. 117333
Author(s):  
Anja Weidner ◽  
Alexei Vinogradov ◽  
Malte Vollmer ◽  
Phillip Krooß ◽  
Mario J. Kriegel ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Srama ◽  
Jon K. Hillier ◽  
Sean Hsu ◽  
Sascha Kempf ◽  
Masanori Kobayashi ◽  
...  

<p>The Cosmic Dust Analyzer (CDA) onboard Cassini characterized successfully the dust environment at Saturn from 2004 to 2017. Besides the study of Saturn’s E ring and its interaction with the embedded moons, CDA detected nanoparticles in the outer Saturn system moving on unbound orbits and originating primarily from Saturn’s E-ring. Although the instrument was built to detect micron and sub-micron sized particles, nano-sized grains were detected during the flyby at early Jupiter and in the outer environment at Saturn. Fast dust particles with sizes below 10 nm were measured by in-situ impact ionization and mass spectra were recorded. What are the limits of in-situ hypervelocity impact detection and what can be expected with current high-resolution mass spectrometers as flown onboard the missions DESTINY+ or EUROPA? Is the sensitivity of Dust Telescopes sufficient to detect nano-diamonds in interstellar space? This presentation summarizes the current experience of in-situ dust detectors and gives a prediction for future missions. In summary, current Dust Telescopes with integrated high-resolution mass spectrometers are more sensitive than the CASSINI Cosmic Dust Analyzer.</p>


Geofluids ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kang Zhao ◽  
Shuijie Gu ◽  
Yajing Yan ◽  
Keping Zhou ◽  
Qiang Li ◽  
...  

Many deep underground excavation practices show that the size and distribution of in situ stress are the main factors resulting in the deformation and instability of the surrounding rock structure. The in situ stress measured by the Kaiser effect of rock is used by engineers because of its economy and convenience. However, due to the lack of quantitative judgment basis in determining the Kaiser point position, there is a large artificial error in the practical application. In response to the problem, this study systematically investigates the characteristics of rock acoustic emission curve on the basis of the fractal theory and establishes an accurate and simple interpretation method for determining the Kaiser point position. The indoor rock acoustic emission test was carried out by drilling a rock sample at a mine site. By using the conventional tangent method, the cumulative ringing count rate-time-stress curve of rock acoustic emission is analyzed to preliminarily determine the time range of Kaiser point appearance. Considering that the fractal dimension of the rock Kaiser point is lower than the adjacent point, the minimum point of the fractal dimension of this time range can be determined from the fractal dimension-time-stress curve. Such determined point is the Kaiser point. The size of the in situ stress is calculated using an analytical method. Based on the value of the in situ stress, the distribution of the in situ stress in the mining area is further analyzed using the geological structure of the mine. The maximum principal stress is 19.38 MPa, with a direction of N (30°-40°) E, and the minimum principal stress is 8.02 MPa with a direction of N (50°-60°) W. The maximum and minimum principal stresses are approximately in the horizontal plane. The intermediate principal stress is 11.73 MPa in vertically downward. These results are basically consistent with the distribution statistical law of the measured in situ stress fields in the world. The results presented in the study could provide a reference for the later mining, stability evaluation, and support of the surrounding rock.


Rock Stress ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 389-394
Author(s):  
H. Watanabe ◽  
H. Tano ◽  
Ö. Aydan ◽  
R. Ulusay ◽  
E. Tuncay ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document