Sparse 3D Radon Space Rigid Registration of CT Scans: Method and Validation Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 497-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Medan ◽  
N. Shamul ◽  
L. Joskowicz
2014 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 541-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Young Kim ◽  
Joon Beom Seo ◽  
Hyun Joo Lee ◽  
Namkug Kim ◽  
Eunsol Lee ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Naomi Shamul ◽  
Leo Joskowicz

BACKGROUND: Detecting and interpreting changes in the images of follow-up CT scans by the clinicians is often time-consuming and error-prone due to changes in patient position and non-rigid anatomy deformations. Thus, reconstructed repeat scan images are required, precluding reduced dose sparse-view repeat scanning. OBJECTIVE: To develop a method to automatically detect changes in a region of interest of sparse-view repeat CT scans in the presence of non-rigid deformations of the patient’s anatomy without reconstructing the original images. METHODS: The proposed method uses the sparse sinogram data of two CT scans to distinguish between genuine changes in the repeat scan and differences due to non-rigid anatomic deformations. First, size and contrast level of the changed regions are estimated from the difference between the scans’ sinogram data. The estimated types of changes in the repeat scan help optimize the method’s parameter values. Two scans are then aligned using Radon space non-rigid registration. Rays which crossed changes in the ROI are detected and back-projected onto image space in a two-phase procedure. These rays form a likelihood map from which the binary changed region map is computed. RESULTS: Experimental studies on four pairs of clinical lung and liver CT scans with simulated changed regions yield a mean changed region recall rate >  86%and a mean precision rate >  83%when detecting large changes with low contrast, and high contrast changes, even when small. The new method outperforms image space methods using prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS) reconstruction, particularly for small, low contrast changes (recall = 15.8%, precision = 94.7%). CONCLUSION: Our method for automatic change detection in sparse-view repeat CT scans with non-rigid deformations may assist radiologists by highlighting the changed regions and may obviate the need for a high-quality repeat scan image when no changes are detected.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1069-1089
Author(s):  
Zeev Adelman ◽  
Leo Joskowicz

BACKGROUND: Repeat CT scanning is ubiquitous in many clinical situations, e.g. to follow disease progression, to evaluate treatment efficacy, and to monitor interventional CT procedures. However, it incurs in cumulative radiation to the patient which can be significantly reduced by using a region of interest (ROI) and the existing baseline scan. OBJECTIVE: To obtain a high-quality reconstruction of a ROI with a significantly reduced X-ray radiation dosage that accounts for deformations. METHODS: We present a new method for deformable registration and image reconstruction inside an ROI in repeat CT scans with a highly reduced X-ray radiation dose based on sparse scanning. Our method uses the existing baseline scan data, a user-defined ROI, and a new sparse repeat scan to compute a high-quality repeat scan ROI image with a significantly reduced radiation dose. Our method first performs rigid registration between the densely scanned baseline and the sparsely scanned repeat CT scans followed by deformable registration with a low-order parametric model, both in 3D Radon space and without reconstructing the repeat scan image. It then reconstructs the repeat scan ROI without computing the entire repeat scan image. RESULTS: Our experimental results on clinical lung and liver CT scans yield a mean × 14 computation speedup and a × 7.6-12.5 radiation dose reduction, with a minor image quality loss of 0.0157 in the NRMSE metric. CONCLUSION: Our method is considerably faster than existing methods, thereby enabling intraoperative online repeat scanning that it is accurate and accounts for position, deformation, and structure changes at a fraction of the radiation dose required by existing methods.


2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 416-416
Author(s):  
Shai Sheji ◽  
Ruth Weissenberg ◽  
Gil Raviv ◽  
Igael Madgar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document