Distributed Beamforming and Autonomous Participation Decision making in Cooperative CR Systems in Presence of Asynchronous Interference

Author(s):  
Mai H. Hassan ◽  
Md Jahangir Hossain ◽  
Vijay K. Bhargava
Author(s):  
Hans Fehr ◽  
Fabian Kindermann

The optimal savings and investment decisions of households along the life cycle were a central issue in Chapter 5. There, savings decisions were made under various forms of risks.However, we restricted our analysis to three period models owing to the limitations of the numerical all-in-one solution we used. In this chapter we want to take a different approach. Applying the dynamic programming techniques learned so far allows us to separate decision-making at different stages of the life cycle into small sub-problems and therefore increase the number of periods we want to look at enormously. This enables us to take amuchmore detailed look at how life-cycle labour supply, savings, and portfolio choice decisions are made in the presence of earnings, investment, and longevity risk. Unlike in Chapter 9, the models we study here are partial equilibrium models. Hence, all prices as well as government policies are exogenous and do not react to changes in household behaviour. This chapter is split into two parts. The first part focuses on labour supply and savings decisions in the presence of labour-productivity and longevity risk. Insurance markets against these risks are missing, such that households will try to self-insure using the only savings vehicle available, a risk-free asset. This model is a quite standard workhorse model in macroeconomics and a straightforward general equilibrium extension exists, the overlapping generations model, which we study in Chapter 11. In the second part of the chapter, we slightly change our viewpoint and look upon the problem of life-cycle decision-making from a financial economics perspective. We therefore exclude laboursupply decisions, but focus on the optimal portfolio choice of households along the life cycle, when various forms of investment vehicles like bonds, stocks, annuities, and retirement accounts are available. This section is devoted to analysing consumption and savings behaviour when households face uncertainty about future earnings and the length of their life span. We study how households can use precautionary savings in a risk-free asset as a means to selfinsure against the risks they face. While in our baseline model we assume that agents always work full-time, we relax this assumption later on by considering a model with endogenous labour supply as well as a model with a labour-force participation decision of second earners within a family context.


1975 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 918-918 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathaniel Beck

The introduction of decision making under uncertainty by Ferejohn and Fiorina is an interesting addition to the literature on rational theories of citizen participation. Decision making under uncertainty assumes, however, that the actor has no knowledge of the probabilities of the various outcomes; this is obviously no more true than the assumption of perfect information about these probabilities made in the decision making under risk model. Voters have some, but not perfect, information about the probabilities of at least some of the different possible outcomes.Specifically, let us look at the two-party case. In Ferejohn's notation, (p3 + p4) is the probability of an individual's vote making a difference. We might expect a rational citizen to know that this probability is at most minuscule, even if he cannot calculate its exact value.


2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 293-300
Author(s):  
Agnes Binagwaho ◽  
Arlan Fuller ◽  
Sarah Dougherty ◽  
Vanessa Kerry ◽  
Mawuena Agbonyitor ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 9321
Author(s):  
Olgica Grcheva ◽  
Beser Oktay Vehbi

According to the ongoing discussions of researchers, practitioners, and international legislation, the prioritization of top-down decision-making processes in public participation is questionable due to their ambiguous outcomes in various contexts associated with the management of cultural heritage. The main aim of this paper is to highlight and identify co-creation as a sustainable and significant bottom-up methodology that has a wide range of applications, especially in the domain of Cultural Heritage Management (CHM). It is presented as an alternative to the already existing, less democratic, and passive public participation decision-making processes. Examining the evolution of the terms and the processes, together with the common aspects and differences between public participation and co-creation is another goal of this paper. Based on these aims and goals, after conducting case study analyses in various contexts and comprehensive theoretical reviews of the international charters and ongoing practices associated with both key terms, “public participation” and “co-creation”, this paper introduces results that have the potential to solve the existing problems in public participation models and frameworks and successfully integrate communities into the CHM decision-making process through the implementation of the co-creation methodology.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10534-10534
Author(s):  
J. Wright ◽  
S. Dimitry ◽  
J. Sussman ◽  
T. J. Whelan

10534 Background: CTs are vital to the development of treatments for patients with cancer, but a low proportion of patients participate in trials, resulting in decreased access to new options. Methods: The study purpose was to explore DS for CT participation decision-making with women diagnosed with breast cancer who were offered a CT. 31 women took part in 6 focus groups - 3 groups of women who consented to a CT, 3 groups who declined a CT. Open-ended questions were asked about specific DS and ideas for new ones. Information rich cases were selected for the sample. Data analyses were conducted by 2 independent coders using a line-by-line, open coding process. Reliability was checked by a 3rd coder. Data was organized with template and editing approaches. Results were compared by group type (declined/consented to CT). Results: Common themes emerged from both group types: too much information is given at the first oncology consult; patients prefer to get CT information from the cancer centre, after their surgery, but prior to their oncology consult; no strong preference about who acts as a DS—family doctor, surgeon, other—as long as good relationship exists; oncologist (to lesser degree surgeon) is seen as most informed about their case; preference for oncologist vs trials nurse to describe CT concept, answer questions, direct them to other information sources; patients doubt family doctors or surgeons have detailed knowledge of CTs, know specific trial data; patients want to feel prepared, know what may happen before they come to oncologist - consult process, CT may be option - to avoid surprise; helpful to know that there is time to make CT decision; other patients are a good source of DS and information. Conclusions: Patients had strong preference to receive information about CTs prior to their consultation with an oncologist; this timing was seen as helpful for decision-making about a CT by both group types. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document