A high-throughput optical biosensor platform for in vitro monitoring DNA conformation and DNA-protein interaction

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 7106-7118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine A. Eliassen ◽  
Amy Baldwin ◽  
Eric M. Sikorski ◽  
Myra M. Hurt

ABSTRACT Expression of the highly conserved replication-dependent histone gene family increases dramatically as a cell enters the S phase of the eukaryotic cell cycle. Requirements for normal histone gene expression in vivo include an element, designated α, located within the protein-encoding sequence of nucleosomal histone genes. Mutation of 5 of 7 nucleotides of the mouse H3.2 α element to yield the sequence found in an H3.3 replication-independent variant abolishes the DNA-protein interaction in vitro and reduces expression fourfold in vivo. A yeast one-hybrid screen of a HeLa cell cDNA library identified the protein responsible for recognition of the histone H3.2 α sequence as the transcription factor Yin Yang 1 (YY1). YY1 is a ubiquitous and highly conserved transcription factor reported to be involved in both activation and repression of gene expression. Here we report that the in vitro histone α DNA-protein interaction depends on YY1 and that mutation of the nucleotides required for the in vitro histone α DNA-YY1 interaction alters the cell cycle phase-specific up-regulation of the mouse H3.2 gene in vivo. Because all mutations or deletions of the histone α sequence both abolish interactions in vitro and cause an in vivo decrease in histone gene expression, the recognition of the histone α element by YY1 is implicated in the correct temporal regulation of replication-dependent histone gene expression in vivo.


Langmuir ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (17) ◽  
pp. 5921-5930 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marijonas Tutkus ◽  
Tomas Rakickas ◽  
Aurimas Kopu̅stas ◽  
Šaru̅nė Ivanovaitė ◽  
Oskaras Venckus ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 86 (26) ◽  
pp. 6022-6025 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benoit Dubertret ◽  
Shumo Liu ◽  
Qi Ouyang ◽  
Albert Libchaber

Plant Methods ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo André Campos Ferraz ◽  
Ana Lúcia Gonçalves Lopes ◽  
Jessy Ariana Faria da Silva ◽  
Diana Filipa Viana Moreira ◽  
Maria João Nogueira Ferreira ◽  
...  

Abstract DNA–protein interactions are essential for several molecular and cellular mechanisms, such as transcription, transcriptional regulation, DNA modifications, among others. For many decades scientists tried to unravel how DNA links to proteins, forming complex and vital interactions. However, the high number of techniques developed for the study of these interactions made the choice of the appropriate technique a difficult task. This review intends to provide a historical context and compile the methods that describe DNA–protein interactions according to the purpose of each approach, summarise the respective advantages and disadvantages and give some examples of recent uses for each technique. The final aim of this work is to help in deciding which technique to perform according to the objectives and capacities of each research team. Considering the DNA–binding proteins characterisation, filter binding assay and EMSA are easy in vitro methods that rapidly identify nucleic acid-protein binding interactions. To find DNA-binding sites, DNA-footprinting is indeed an easier, faster and reliable approach, however, techniques involving base analogues and base-site selection are more precise. Concerning binding kinetics and affinities, filter binding assay and EMSA are useful and easy methods, although SPR and spectroscopy techniques are more sensitive. Finally, relatively to genome-wide studies, ChIP–seq is the desired method, given the coverage and resolution of the technique. In conclusion, although some experiments are easier and faster than others, when designing a DNA–protein interaction study several concerns should be taken and different techniques may need to be considered, since different methods confer different precisions and accuracies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (21) ◽  
pp. 8024-8043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yueqin Li ◽  
Yun Li ◽  
Zhiwei Yang ◽  
Fantao Meng ◽  
Nana Wang ◽  
...  

A novel aroylhydrazone ligand-bridged Ni(ii) coordination polymer was reported and its DNA binding, protein interaction, radical scavenging and in vitro anticancer properties were evaluated.


2016 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 43-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.A. Karpov ◽  
◽  
O.M. Demchuk ◽  
V.M. Britsun ◽  
D.I. Lytvyn ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document