Effect of pore geometry on Gassmann fluid substitution

2015 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 1575-1587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fuyong Yan ◽  
De-Hua Han
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-114
Author(s):  
Sonny Inichinbia ◽  
◽  
Peter O. Sule ◽  
Aminu L. Ahmed ◽  
Halidu Hamza

Geophysics ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 75 (3) ◽  
pp. N65-N78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ida L. Fabricius ◽  
Gregor T. Bächle ◽  
Gregor P. Eberli

Elastic moduli of water-saturated sedimentary rocks are in some cases different from moduli derived using Gassmann fluid substitution on data for rocks in the dry state. To address this discrepancy, we use a data set representing 115 carbonate samples from different depositional settings and a wide range of porosity and permeability. Depositional texture is reflected in the effect of water on elastic moduli and in the porosity-permeability relationship. Depositional texture is taken into account when porosity and permeability are combined in the effective specific surface of pores, which is related for a given pore fluid to the reference frequency as defined by Biot. For a given frequency of elastic waves, we obtain Biot’s frequency ratio between measured ultrasonic wave frequency and Biot reference frequency. For mostsamples with a frequency ratio above 10, elastic moduli in the water-saturated case are higher than predicted from elastic moduli in the dry case by Gassmann fluid substitution. This stiffening effect of water in some cases may be described by Biot’s high-frequency model, although in heterogeneous samples, a squirt mechanism is more probable. For data representing frequency ratios of 0.01 to 1, Gassmann fluid substitution works well. For samples with frequency ratios below 0.001, elastic moduli in the water-saturated case are lower than would be expected according to Gassmann’s equations or to Biot’s theory. This water-softening effect becomes stronger with decreasing frequency ratio. Water softening or stiffening of elastic moduli may be addressed by effective-medium modeling. In this study, we used the isoframe model to quantify water softening as a function of frequency ratio.


2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 181-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aamir Ali ◽  
Muhammad Kashif ◽  
Matloob Hussain ◽  
Jamil Siddique ◽  
Irfan Aslam ◽  
...  

Geophysics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. WB89-WB95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Grechka

It is usually believed that Gassmann fluid substitution can be performed only for a fully interconnected portion of the pore space. While this is certainly true, the presence of disconnected porosity does not necessarily invalidate Gassmann’s predictions. This unconventional view is supported with an analytic proof of the equivalence of Gassmann theory and the noninteraction approximation for the effective elasticity of solids with isolated self-similar pores. Numerical tests for more realistic microgeometries, where pores have diverse shapes and the pore space is partially disconnected, demonstrate that errors in Gassmann-type infill substitution are typically small and unlikely to exceed a few percent as long as the aspect ratios of pores are greater than approximately 0.2. If the fracture-like pores are aligned or elasticities of the substituted infills are close, Gassmann theory remains accurate for isolated pores with smaller aspect ratios.


Geophysics ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. L87-L99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Mavko ◽  
Nishank Saxena

Fluid and solid substitution of bulk modulus are exact and unique for materials whose elastic bulk and/or shear moduli fall on the Hashin-Shtrikman bounds. For materials whose moduli lie between the bounds, solid and fluid substitution of bulk moduli can be computed exactly, but not uniquely. Every initial bulk modulus can be realized with an infinite number of microstructures and therefore transform to an infinite number of moduli upon substitution of the pore fill. This nonuniqueness arises when detailed information on the material pore geometry is not available. We evaluated four embedded-bound constructions for fluid and solid substitution that were based on realizable materials. In the limiting case of pore fluids, two of these constructions reduced to the bounds of Gibiansky and Torquato, which illustrated that those bounds were optimum. For solids, the first two constructions corresponded to a homogeneous pore stiffness and predicted the smallest change in modulus. The third construction prediction corresponded to a pore space with heterogeneous stiffness, and it predicted a much larger change in modulus.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document