scholarly journals Primary and secondary effects of social origins on educational attainment: New findings for England

Author(s):  
Erzsébet Bukodi ◽  
John H. Goldthorpe ◽  
Yizhang Zhao
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erzsebet Bukodi ◽  
John H Goldthorpe ◽  
Yizhang Zhao

We aim to bring together two strands of existing research into inequalities in individuals’ educational attainment associated with their social origins: that into the relative importance of the primary and secondary effects of social origins; and that into the relative importance of different components of social origins, indicative of different kinds of parental resources. Our main findings are the following. The secondary effects of social origins – their effects via the educational choices that young people make given their prior academic performance – are clearly operative across five key educational transitions within the English educational system. More specifically, we estimate that 35% of the total effect of social origins is secondary in the earliest transition we consider, and from 15-20% in the subsequent four. Further, mediation analyses reveal that secondary effects are most strongly associated with parental education and then to a lesser degree with parental status, while little association exists with parental class and none at all with parental income. Primary effects are also at all transitions most strongly associated with parental education and status but in this case both parental class and parental income do retain some importance. Finally, secondary effects on educational transitions appear to be top-driven. There is a clear tendency for their importance to be greater in the case of young people with highly educated, professional parents as compared with those of all other social backgrounds. We suggest an explanation for our empirical findings as resulting largely from the concern of such parents and their children to avoid the occurrence of downward intergenerational mobility, especially in terms of education and status.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yizhang Zhao ◽  
Erzsebet Bukodi

This Data Note has been prepared for the research project ‘Primary and Secondary Effects of Social Origins on Educational Attainment: A New Approach’, conducted at the Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford. The purpose of this project is to examine how different components of social origins affect people’s educational achievement and attainment. To achieve this aim, we use data from the Longitudinal Study of Young People in England (LSYPE) and the National Pupil Database (NPD). This document describes the construction of key variables that have been be used in the project. Specifically, it provides information on the focal independent variables – parental class, status, education and income – as recorded in the LSYPE survey, as well as the dependent variable(s) of educational achievement and attainment, as recorded in the National Pupil Database (NPD) and the latest available wave of the LSYPE survey.


2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 211-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Jackson ◽  
Robert Erikson ◽  
John H. Goldthorpe ◽  
Meir Yaish

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Sullivan ◽  
Samantha Parsons ◽  
Francis Green ◽  
Richard D. Wiggins ◽  
George Ploubidis

This paper provides a comprehensive account of the way in which cognitive and educational attainment mediate the link between social origins and elite social class destinations in mid-life. Using the 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70), we assess the roles of a range of pathways through which educational advantage may lead to occupational attainment: cognitive development; private and selective secondary schools; school level qualifications; and higher education, including institution and field of study. Whereas past research has shown a residual direct effect of social origins on class destinations, we find that, once a sufficiently detailed picture of educational attainment is taken into account, education fully explains the link between social origins and top social class destinations. In contrast, the gap between men and women in achieving top social class positions is in no part accounted for by education.


Author(s):  
Christiana Kartsonaki ◽  
Michelle Jackson ◽  
David R. Cox

2009 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 325-327
Author(s):  
V. M. Dvornikov ◽  
M. V. Kravtsova ◽  
A. A. Lukovnikova ◽  
V. E. Sdobnov

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document