scholarly journals Associations between obesity and overweight and fall risk, health status and quality of life in older people

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca J. Mitchell ◽  
Stephen R. Lord ◽  
Lara A. Harvey ◽  
Jacqueline C.T. Close
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shota Ikegami ◽  
Jun Takahashi ◽  
Masashi Uehara ◽  
Ryosuke Tokida ◽  
Hikaru Nishimura ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Kliempt ◽  
D Ruta ◽  
M McMurdo

IntroductionThis is the last in a series of three papers reviewing 69 patient-based outcome measures that have been developed specifically for use in older people, or that have been administered to populations that include older people. The previous papers described how the measures were identified, and provided brief descriptions of measures of general health status and quality of life, instruments assessing mental status, measures of depression, and measures of psychological wellbeing. In this paper we describe six pain measures, 12 measures of physical disability and handicap, and eight measures of social health (see Tables 1–3). References in the text which include a copy of the questionnaire are marked with a # sign. Otherwise, a copy can be obtained from the address provided. It is recommended, however, before using any of the questionnaires to contact the authors to obtain permission to use them.


2000 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Kliempt ◽  
D. Ruta ◽  
M. McMurdo

This is the second in a series of three papers reviewing 69 patient-based outcome measures that have been developed specifically for use with older people, or that have been administered to populations that include older people. The first paper described how the measures were identified, and provided a brief description of 17 measures of general health status and quality of life. This paper reviews nine measures of mental status and cognitive function, 10 measures of depression and anxiety, and seven psychological wellbeing measures (see Tables 1-3).


2010 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 2124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoang Van Minh ◽  
Peter Byass ◽  
Nguyen Thi Kim Chuc ◽  
Stig Wall

2021 ◽  
pp. 33-33
Author(s):  
Zoran Vesic ◽  
Miroslav Brkic ◽  
Jelena Tanasijevic ◽  
Marko Milanovic ◽  
Milica Vukasinovic-Vesic

Introduction/Aim: Aim of the study was to investigate influence of the health status as well as other contributing factors on perceived quality of life of the older people in Belgrade. Methods: The survey was conducted in October 2019 on a representative sample of 764 people aged between 65 and 79 years (X = 72.68 ? 7.11), (39.9% male and 60.1% female) living in Belgrade. The research used a questionnaire developed on the basis of the World Health Organization methodology for age friendly cities, aimed to explore 11 areas important for the elderly. Results: Factor of physical accessibility of community is highly significant [?2 (df = 3, n = 764) = 238.905; p < 0.001] and explained 39.4% of variance of perceived quality of life, while socio-economic factors show the same amount of variance, 35.0% [?2 (df = 3, n = 764) = 207.571; p < 0.001]. Social environment explains 24.6% of variance of perceived quality of life [?2 (df = 4, n = 764) = 140.242; p < 0.001]. Health status has greatest explanatory power regarding perceived quality of life and explain as much as 46.7% of variance [?2 (df = 8, n = 764) = 292.083; p < 0.001]. When unique impact of health status on quality of life is analyzed, when other variables are controlled, health status explains 21.6% of variance in addition to variance explained by physical accessibility, socio-economic status and social environment. Conclusion: Although health status has the greatest impact on perceived quality of life of older people, interventions on other life important domains such as physical accessibility, socio-economic status and social environment could have positive impact on perceived quality of life where health status alone could not be improved.


2005 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 585-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
KATARINA WILHELMSON ◽  
CHRISTINA ANDERSSON ◽  
MARGDA WAERN ◽  
PETER ALLEBECK

Quality of life has become increasingly important as an outcome in medical research. The influence of health status is often emphasised, but other dimensions are important. In order to improve quality of life, there is a need to know what people themselves consider important to their perception of quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate what older people consider to be important for their quality of life, and to explore the impact of gender, education and health status on individual perceptions. The study was of 141 randomly selected people aged from 67 to 99 years that formed a control sample for a study of suicide among older people. They were interviewed in person about their health, socio-demographic background and, using an open-ended question, what they considered to constitute quality of life. Their answers were grouped into eight categories, with social relations being the most frequent response, followed by health, activities, functional ability, wellbeing, personal beliefs and attitudes, their own home and personal finances. In addition, they were asked to choose from a ‘show card’ three items that they regarded as important to quality of life. Functional ability was the most frequently selected domain, followed by physical health, social relations and being able to continue to live in one's present home. Our conclusion is that social relations, functional ability and activities influence the quality of life of elderly people as much as health status.


2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annie Hawton ◽  
Colin Green ◽  
Andy P. Dickens ◽  
Suzanne H. Richards ◽  
Rod S. Taylor ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine M. Milte ◽  
Ruth Walker ◽  
Mary A. Luszcz ◽  
Emily Lancsar ◽  
Billingsley Kaambwa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document