Improving the impact of public health service delivery and research: a decision tree to aid evidence‐based public health practice and research

The oral health of Inuit children in Canada has been identified as a public health crisis. Although efforts are being made to identify and address ways to deal with this crisis, current policy and program approaches are largely entrenched within the prevailing paradigm of dental science to the exclusion of Indigenous people’s understandings of health. This article reports qualitative findings of a larger study aimed at identifying, understanding, and addressing rates of oral disease among children living in NunatuKavut, a cluster of small, coastal Inuit communities located in southern Labrador, Canada. Through 18 focus groups with youth (n = 86), caregivers (n = 22), and interviews with key informant (n = 13), this study begins to elucidate southern Inuit understandings of oral health. Theorized using Two-Eyed Seeing, an Indigenous approach to balancing both Indigenous and non-Indigenous understandings of the world, the findings reported here reveal 3 themes, each of which is crosscut by historical and contemporary dimensions: 1) (w)holistic conceptualizations of health are essential to good oral health, 2) achieving optimal oral health is prohibitive for Inuit communities, and 3) community-engaged oral health service delivery is needed. Our recommendations have implications for improved oral public health service delivery for Inuit communities, in that the inclusion of Inuit perspectives on oral health should form an instrumental element of oral public health service delivery. Knowledge Transfer Statement: The results of this study may be used by clinicians and oral health educators to inform approaches to oral health service delivery within the context of Indigenous communities. It may also be used by policymakers to recognize how historical and contemporary issues of colonization relate to the formation of oral health–related policies.

Download Full-text

Neuroradiological Assessment of Referrals for MR Brain Scan: Our Experience

Rivista di Neuroradiologia ◽

10.1177/197140090501800101 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 18 (1) ◽

pp. 9-15

Author(s):

M. Leonardi ◽

M. Maffei ◽

S. Battaglia ◽

C. Barbara ◽

P. Cenni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Public Health ◽

Health Service ◽

Public Health Service ◽

Waiting Lists ◽

Ct Scans ◽

Radiological Assessment ◽

Appropriateness Criteria ◽

Experimental Project ◽

The Impact ◽

Mr Scanning

The growing demand for brain MR scans in recent years has led to long waiting lists and indiscriminate referral with respect to the clinical need for imaging and appropriateness criteria for MR scanning. To overcome this problem, the Bologna Public Health Service in conjunction with S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital devised an experimental project instituting a radiological assessment prior to booking MR scans, implemented on 1st November 2003. The assessment is carried out by doctors in the Radiology and neuroradiology units to establish whether referral for MR scan is appropriate and to draw up a priority scale for access to MR diagnosis. If MR investigation is deemed inappropriate, the project provides for an alternative procedure or specialist clinical examination. The patient is admitted to the charge of the service and followed throughout the diagnostic work-up, i.e. the doctor undertaking the assessment will prescribe a possible specialist clinical consultation or other radiological procedures, generally CT scans performed by the same Radiology or Neuroradiology unit. We report on neuroradiological assessment of referrals for brain MR scans on behalf of the Public Health Service and carried out at the Neuroradiology Unit in Bellaria Hospital, Bologna. From 1st November to 31st July 2004, 2659 assessments were undertaken. Of these 2163 were approved for MR scanning whereas 496 referrals were modified, mostly into CT scans and some patients were referred for otorhinolaringology, endocrinology or neurology specialist consultation. To assess the impact of this “filter”, we compared a sample period of six months from 1st February 2003 to 31st July 2003 before the radiological assessment project had been implemented with a period of the same length the following year. We found that the number of negative MR scans was halved after the project had been implemented (from 24.49% in 2003 to 12.18% in 2004), showing that in addition to shortening waiting lists for MR scans, there has been a sharp rise in the number of appropriate scans.

Download Full-text