scholarly journals Anomalous Temporoparietal Activity in Individuals with a Family History of Alcoholism: Studies from the Oklahoma Family Health Patterns Project

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1639-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Acheson ◽  
Crystal Franklin ◽  
Andrew J. Cohoon ◽  
David C. Glahn ◽  
Peter T. Fox ◽  
...  
2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 1922-1928 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Lovallo ◽  
Andrea C. King ◽  
Noha H. Farag ◽  
Kristen H. Sorocco ◽  
Andrew J. Cohoon ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 38 (12) ◽  
pp. 1793-1802 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. J. Milne ◽  
T. E. Moffitt ◽  
R. Crump ◽  
R. Poulton ◽  
M. Rutter ◽  
...  

BackgroundThere is increased interest in assessing the family history of psychiatric disorders for both genetic research and public health screening. It is unclear how best to combine family history reports into an overall score. We compare the predictive validity of different family history scores.MethodProbands from the Dunedin Study (n=981, 51% male) had their family history assessed for nine different conditions. We computed four family history scores for each disorder: (1) a simple dichotomous categorization of whether or not probands had any disordered first-degree relatives; (2) the observed number of disordered first-degree relatives; (3) the proportion of first-degree relatives who are disordered; and (4) Reed's score, which expressed the observed number of disordered first-degree relatives in terms of the number expected given the age and sex of each relative. We compared the strength of association between each family history score and probands' disorder outcome.ResultsEach score produced significant family history associations for all disorders. The scores that took account of the number of disordered relatives within families (i.e. the observed, proportion, and Reed's scores) produced significantly stronger associations than the dichotomous score for conduct disorder, alcohol dependence and smoking. Taking account of family size (i.e. using the proportion or Reed's score) produced stronger family history associations depending on the prevalence of the disorder among family members.ConclusionsDichotomous family history scores can be improved upon by considering the number of disordered relatives in a family and the population prevalence of the disorder.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 296-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara A. Dennison ◽  
Paul L. Jenkins ◽  
Thomas A. Pearson

Objective. The Expert Panel on Blood Cholesterol Levels in Children and Adolescents of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) recommends selective screening of children for high blood cholesterol. We determined the number of children, who, according to the guidelines, should be targeted for cholesterol screening. Design. Population survey. Setting. Permanent household residents in Otsego County, NY. Participants. Total population-based sample of 17 444 households (86.6% response rate) including 44 565 participants, of whom 10 457 were children, aged 2 through 19 years. Main outcome measures. Percent of children qualifying for cholesterol screening under the NCEP Children's Panel guidelines. Results. Children from two-parent families were more likely to have known family history of coronary heart disease (CHD) before 60 years of age (41.8% vs 25.8%, P < .001), and twice as likely as children from single-parent families to have known parental hypercholesterolemia (18.8% vs 9.5%, P < .001). Only 39% of parents reported having had their cholesterol level checked; they were better educated and more likely to have health insurance. Parents with a first-degree relative with CHD before 60 years of age were more likely to report having their cholesterol level checked and to report a high cholesterol level. We calculated that 27% of children (18% of children from single-parent households and 29% of children from two-parent households) would report a known family history of premature CHD (ie, CHD before 55 years of age) and qualify for lipoprotein analysis, and that 11% of children would qualify for total cholesterol screening because of known parental hypercholesterolemia without a family history of premature CHD. Thirty-five percent of children had incomplete or unavailable family health history and/or unknown parental cholesterol status. Conclusions. In this population, 38% of children would be targeted for cholesterol screening, exceeding the estimate of the NCEP Children and Adolescents Panel. The selection process, however, would tend to miss children from single-parent families, children with incomplete family health history, and children whose parents have not had their cholesterol levels measured. The currently recommended pediatric cholesterol screening policy needs to be evaluated further in additional communities and population settings. Alternative cholesterol screening strategies are needed when family health history is incomplete and/or parental cholesterol status is unknown.


1982 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 482-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin A. Seider ◽  
Keith L. Gladstien ◽  
Kenneth K. Kidd

Time of language onset and frequencies of speech and language problems were examined in stutterers and their nonstuttering siblings. These families were grouped according to six characteristics of the index stutterer: sex, recovery or persistence of stuttering, and positive or negative family history of stuttering. Stutterers and their nonstuttering same-sex siblings were found to be distributed identically in early, average, and late categories of language onset. Comparisons of six subgroups of stutterers and their respective nonstuttering siblings showed no significant differences in the number of their reported articulation problems. Stutterers who were reported to be late talkers did not differ from their nonstuttering siblings in the frequency of their articulation problems, but these two groups had significantly higher frequencies of articulation problems than did stutterers who were early or average talkers and their siblings.


2001 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. A442-A442
Author(s):  
P TSIBOURIS ◽  
M HENDRICKSE ◽  
P ISAACS

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document