The research cost of adapting agriculture to climate change: A global analysis to 2050

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 207-220 ◽  
Author(s):  
Uris Lantz C. Baldos ◽  
Keith O. Fuglie ◽  
Thomas W. Hertel
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Paniw ◽  
Tamora James ◽  
C. Ruth Archer ◽  
Gesa Römer ◽  
Sam Levin ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTApproximately 25 % of mammals are threatened globally with extinction, a risk that is amplified under climate change1. Persistence under climate change is determined by the combined effects of climatic factors on multiple demographic rates (survival, development, reproduction), and hence, on population dynamics2. Thus, to quantify which species and places on Earth are most vulnerable to climate-driven extinction, a global understanding of how demographic rates respond to climate is needed3. We synthesise information on such responses in terrestrial mammals, where extensive demographic data are available4. Given the importance of assessing the full spectrum of responses, we focus on studies that quantitatively link climate to multiple demographic rates. We identify 106 such studies, corresponding to 86 mammal species. We reveal a strong mismatch between the locations of demographic studies and the regions and taxa currently recognised as most vulnerable to climate change5,6. Moreover, we show that the effects of climate change on mammals will operate via complex demographic mechanisms: a vast majority of mammal populations display projected increases in some demographic rates but declines in others. Assessments of population viability under climate change therefore need to account for multiple demographic responses. We advocate to prioritise coordinated actions to assess mammal demography holistically for effective conservation worldwide.


2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 4299-4308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vicky Espinoza ◽  
Duane E. Waliser ◽  
Bin Guan ◽  
David A. Lavers ◽  
F. Martin Ralph

2020 ◽  
Vol 160 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nina Knittel ◽  
Martin W. Jury ◽  
Birgit Bednar-Friedl ◽  
Gabriel Bachner ◽  
Andrea K. Steiner

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (7) ◽  
pp. e0217592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Francois Bastin ◽  
Emily Clark ◽  
Thomas Elliott ◽  
Simon Hart ◽  
Johan van den Hoogen ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 126 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 81-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Trabucco ◽  
Robert J. Zomer ◽  
Deborah A. Bossio ◽  
Oliver van Straaten ◽  
Louis V. Verchot

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.E. Bowler ◽  
A.D. Bjorkman ◽  
M. Dornelas ◽  
I.H. Myers-Smith ◽  
L. M. Navarro ◽  
...  

AbstractClimate change and other anthropogenic drivers of biodiversity change are unequally distributed across the world. The geographic patterns of different drivers, and the spatial overlap among these drivers, have important implications for the direction and pace of biodiversity change, yet are not well documented. Moreover, it is unknown if the geographic patterns of drivers differ between the terrestrial and marine realm, as expected due to marked differences in how humans interact with the land and ocean.We compiled global gridded datasets on climate change, land-use, resource exploitation, pollution, species invasions, and human population density. We used multivariate statistics to examine the spatial relationships among the datasets and to characterize the typical combinations of drivers experienced by different parts of the world.We found stronger positive correlations among drivers in the terrestrial than in the marine realm, leading to areas of high intensities of multiple drivers on land. Climate change tended to be negatively correlated with other drivers in the terrestrial realm (e.g., in the tundra and boreal forest with high climate change but low human use and pollution) whereas the opposite was true in the marine realm (e.g., in the Indo-Pacific with high climate change and high fishing).We show that different regions of the world can be defined by anthropogenic threat complexes (ATCs), distinguished by different sets of drivers with varying intensities. The ATCs can be used to test hypothesis about the pattern of biodiversity change, especially the joint effects of multiple drivers. More generally, our global analysis highlights the broad conservation priorities needed to mitigate the effects of anthropogenic change on biodiversity responses, with different priorities emerging on land and in the ocean, and in different parts of the world.


Eos ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rishika Pardikar

Biden’s executive order calling for consideration of new methane regulations comes on the heels of a new global analysis of the fuel’s impact on climate change.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (10) ◽  
pp. e0224120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Francois Bastin ◽  
Emily Clark ◽  
Thomas Elliott ◽  
Simon Hart ◽  
Johan van den Hoogen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document