Temporomandibular joint dysfunction following the use of a supraglottic airway device during general anaesthesia: a prospective observational study

Anaesthesia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Akhtar ◽  
N. Ungureanu ◽  
S. Cakir ◽  
U. Ansari ◽  
T.‐Y. Mohamed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint ◽  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Airway Device ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Device ◽  
Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction

scholarly journals Baska mask®-A third generation supraglottic airway device in clinical practice- A prospective observational study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 576-581
Author(s):  
Sarika M Shetty ◽  
Anil Kumar M R ◽  
Meghana Marulasidappa ◽  
Prashanth Parmar ◽  
Vyshnavi S
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Airway Device ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Device

scholarly journals Analysis of ease of insertions, its attempts and time taken to insert for i-gel and cLMA in paediatric cases.

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-101
Author(s):  
Dr. Nimish Jain ◽  
◽  
Dr. Susheela Taxak ◽  
Dr. Karampal Singh ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Airway Device ◽  
Blind Study ◽  
Supraglottic Airway ◽  
Supraglottic Airway Device ◽  
Physical Status ◽  
Aim Analysis ◽  
American Society ◽  
Single Blind

Aim: Analysis of ease of insertions, its attempts and time taken to insert for i-gel and cLMA inpaediatric cases. Methods: We did a prospective, randomised single-blind study on Eighty patientsof either sex belonging to American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I or II,between 6 months to 8 years of age, scheduled to undergo elective surgery for less than one andhalf hour duration under general anaesthesia. In this study we analysed the ease of insertion,attempts and time were taken to insert the supraglottic airway device. Results: The ease ofinsertion observed was easy in 39(97.5%) in the i-gel group and 35(87.5%) in cLMA group in ourstudy. The i-gel was placed successfully in 39 out of 40 (97.5%) patients in the first attempt, andachieved 100% insertion on the second attempt. Correct positioning of cLMA in the first attempt wasseen in 35 out of 40 (87.5%) patients. The remaining 5 patients (12.5%) required a secondattempt. The average insertion time of cLMA (12.88 ± 1.771 seconds) was longer than the averagetime of insertion of i-gel (9.48 ± 1.037 seconds), and these differences were highly significantstatistically (p= 0.000). Conclusion: To conclude, i-gel and cLMA is effective and safe devices foruse in children. Both are easy to insert and have insignificant morbidity, however, time taken andattempts of insertions for i-gel was lesser than cLMA. Also, the ease of insertion was relatively easyfor i-gel than cLMA in pediatric cases.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document