scholarly journals A nonparametric Bayesian model for estimating spectral densities of resting‐state EEG twin data

Biometrics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Hart ◽  
Michele Guindani ◽  
Stephen Malone ◽  
Mark Fiecas
Author(s):  
Fatemeh Pourmotahari ◽  
◽  
Seyyed Mohammad Tabatabaei ◽  
Nasrin Borumandnia ◽  
Naghmeh Khadembashi ◽  
...  

Introduction: Parkinson’s disease is a neurodegenerative disease that disrupts functional brain networks. Many neurodegenerative disorders are associated with changes in brain communication patterns. Resting-state functional connectivity studies can distinguish the topological structure of Parkinson's patients from healthy individuals by analyzing patterns between different regions of the brain. Accordingly, the present study aimed to determine the brain topological features and functional connectivity in patients with Parkinson's disease, using a Bayesian approach. Method: The data of this study were downloaded from the open neuro site. These data include "Resting-State Functional MRI" (rs-fMRI) of 11 healthy individuals and 11 Parkinson’s patients with mean ages of 64.36 and 63.73, respectively. An advanced nonparametric Bayesian model was used to evaluate topological characteristics, including clustering of brain regions and correlation coefficient of the clusters. The significance of functional relationships based on each edge between the two groups was examined through false discovery rate (FDR) and network-based statistics (NBS) methods. Results: Brain connectivity results showed a major difference in terms of the number of regions in each cluster and the correlation coefficient between the patient and healthy groups. The largest clusters in the patient and control groups were 26 and 53 regions, respectively, with clustering correlation values of 0.36 and 0.26. Although there are 15 common areas across the two clusters, the intensity of the functional relationship between these areas was different in the two groups. Moreover, using NBS and FDR methods, no significant difference was observed for each edge between the patient and healthy groups (p-value>0.05). Conclusion: The results of this study show a different topological configuration of the brain network between the patient and healthy groups, indicating changes in the functional relationship between a set of areas of the brain.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sini Nagpal ◽  
Xiaoran Meng ◽  
Michael P. Epstein ◽  
Lam C. Tsoi ◽  
Matthew Patrick ◽  
...  

AbstractThe transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) that test for association between the study trait and the imputed gene expression levels from cis-acting expression quantitative trait loci (cis-eQTL) genotypes have successfully enhanced the discovery of genetic risk loci for complex traits. By using the gene expression imputation models fitted from reference datasets that have both genetic and transcriptomic data, TWAS facilitates gene-based tests with GWAS data while accounting for the reference transcriptomic data. The existing TWAS tools like PrediXcan and FUSION use parametric imputation models that have limitations for modeling the complex genetic architecture of transcriptomic data. Therefore, we propose an improved Bayesian method that assumes a data-driven nonparametric prior to impute gene expression. Our method is general and flexible and includes both the parametric imputation models used by PrediXcan and FUSION as special cases. Our simulation studies showed that the nonparametric Bayesian model improved both imputation R2 for transcriptomic data and the TWAS power over PrediXcan. In real applications, our nonparametric Bayesian method fitted transcriptomic imputation models for 2X number of genes with 1.7X average regression R2 over PrediXcan, thus improving the power of follow-up TWAS. Hence, the nonparametric Bayesian model is preferred for modeling the complex genetic architecture of transcriptomes and is expected to enhance transcriptome-integrated genetic association studies. We implement our Bayesian approach in a convenient software tool “TIGAR” (Transcriptome-Integrated Genetic Association Resource), which imputes transcriptomic data and performs subsequent TWAS using individual-level or summary-level GWAS data.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 1123-1132 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Nagarajan ◽  
R. I. Minu ◽  
A. Jayanthila Devi

2013 ◽  
Vol 108 (503) ◽  
pp. 775-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juhee Lee ◽  
Peter Müller ◽  
Yitan Zhu ◽  
Yuan Ji

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document