Effects of an intervention program for reducing severe perineal trauma during the second stage of labor

Birth ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 371-378
Author(s):  
Edda Sveinsdottir ◽  
Helga Gottfredsdottir ◽  
Anna S. Vernhardsdottir ◽  
Gudny B. Tryggvadottir ◽  
Reynir T. Geirsson
Author(s):  
Mariana Peppe ◽  
Juliana Stefanello ◽  
Bruna Infante ◽  
Mauricio Kobayashi ◽  
Claudia Baraldi ◽  
...  

Objective Perineal trauma is a negative outcome during labor, and until now it is unclear if the maternal position during the second stage of labor may influence the risk of acquiring severe perineal trauma. We have aimed to determine the prevalence of perineal trauma and its risk factors in a low-risk maternity with a high incidence of upright position during the second stage of labor. Methods A retrospective cohort study of 264 singleton pregnancies during labor was performed at a low-risk pregnancy maternity during a 6-month period. Perineal trauma was classified according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG), and perineal integrity was divided into three categories: no tears; first/second-degree tears + episiotomy; and third and fourth-degree tears. A multinomial analysis was performed to search for associated factors of perineal trauma. Results From a total of 264 women, there were 2 cases (0.75%) of severe perineal trauma, which occurred in nulliparous women younger than 25 years old. Approximately 46% (121) of the women had no tears, and 7.95% (21) performed mediolateral episiotomies. Perineal trauma was not associated with maternal position (p = 0.285), health professional (obstetricians or midwives; p = 0.231), newborns with 4 kilos or more (p = 0.672), and labor analgesia (p = 0.319). The multinomial analysis showed that white and nulliparous presented, respectively, 3.90 and 2.90 times more risk of presenting perineal tears. Conclusion The incidence of severe perineal trauma was low. The prevalence of upright position during the second stage of labor was 42%. White and nulliparous women were more prone to develop perineal tears.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 18-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malin Edqvist ◽  
Ingela Rådestad ◽  
Ingela Lundgren ◽  
Margareta Mollberg ◽  
Helena Lindgren

Author(s):  
Giulia Magoga ◽  
Gabriele Saccone ◽  
Huda B. Al-Kouatly ◽  
Hannah Dahlen G ◽  
Charlene Thornton ◽  
...  

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Edqvist ◽  
H. G. Dahlen ◽  
C. Häggsgård ◽  
H. Tern ◽  
K. Ängeby ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Severe perineal trauma sustained during childbirth is a serious complication since it can lead to both short- and long-term consequences for women. Some of the methods used to prevent perineal injuries have been evaluated in clinical trials, but there are still gaps in the evidence. A new clinical practice has been introduced, adopted by more than half of the maternity wards in Sweden with the aim of reducing severe perineal trauma. This procedure involves two midwives assisting the woman during the second stage of labour. Methods/design In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, 2946 women will be randomised to be assisted by one or two midwives during the second stage of labour. Women age 18–47, who plan for their first vaginal birth, with a singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation, will be asked to participate when admitted to the maternity ward. Five maternity wards comprising 19,500 births/year in different parts of Sweden will participate in this study. The sample size is powered to demonstrate a 50% reduction (from 4.1–2.0%) in primary outcome, which is the prevalence of severe perineal trauma (3rd and 4th degree). Secondary outcomes will include maternal and neonatal outcomes, women’s experiences, midwives’ experiences of the intervention, incontinence, and pelvic floor symptoms. The primary analysis is intention to treat. Questionnaires will be sent to the women at 1 month and 1 year after the birth to assess women’s experiences, pain, incontinence, pelvic floor symptoms, sexual function, and mental health. Discussion It is important for care during labour and birth to be evidence based. There is a strong desire among midwives to reduce the risk of severe perineal trauma. This may lead to new strategies and practices being implemented into practice without scientific evidence. The intervention might have negative side effects or unintended consequences. On the other hand, there is a possibility of the intervention improving care for women. Trial registration {2a} ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03770962. Registered on 10 December 2018


Author(s):  
Suleyman Cemil Oglak ◽  
Mehmet Obut

<p><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> This study was aimed to investigate the effect of perineal massage in the second stage of labor in prevention perineal traumas during childbirth.</p><p><strong>STUDY DESIGN:</strong> This observational study was conducted with 171 nulliparous women delivered by vaginally between January 2017 and May 2019. All the patients managed by the selective episiotomy principle. All the patients were divided into two groups: the perineal massage group and the control group. The perineal massage was performed during the second stage of labor until the baby's head was birth. The control group received routine labor care. In the case of threatening tears in any patient and at the preference of the midwife, mediolateral episiotomy was performed. Following childbirth, the perineum and vagina were examined for perineal tears and episiotomy by the midwives.</p><p><strong>RESULTS:</strong> The length of the second stage of labor was significantly lower in the massage group (36±19 minute) compared with the control group (46±25 minute, p=0.024). Twenty-five women (28.8%) in the massage group had intact perineum after vaginal birth, compared with five (6.0%) in the control group (p=0.003). The rate of first- and second-degree perineal tears are higher in the massage group [28 patients (32.2%) and 9 patients (10.3%), respectively] than in the control group [10 patients (11.9%) and 5 patients (6.0%), respectively, p&lt;0.001]. The incidence of episiotomy was significantly lower in the massage group (25 patients, 28.7%) than in the control group (64 patients, 76.1%, p&lt;0.001). </p><p><strong>CONCLUSION:</strong> Perineal massage should be considered a routine intervention to reduce the incidence of perineal trauma.</p>


2011 ◽  
Vol 285 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehrnaz Geranmayeh ◽  
Zahra Rezaei Habibabadi ◽  
Bijan Fallahkish ◽  
Mahdi Azizabadi Farahani ◽  
Zohreh Khakbazan ◽  
...  

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 171A-171A
Author(s):  
E XENAKIS ◽  
J PIPER ◽  
M MCFARLAND ◽  
C SUITER ◽  
O LANGER

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document