scholarly journals Overcoming difficulties with equipoise to enable recruitment to a randomised controlled trial of partial ablation vs radical prostatectomy for unilateral localised prostate cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 122 (6) ◽  
pp. 970-977 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daisy Elliott ◽  
Freddie C. Hamdy ◽  
Tom A. Leslie ◽  
Derek Rosario ◽  
Tim Dudderidge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Randomised Controlled

A single-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial to evaluate NeuroSAFE robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) versus standard robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in men with localized prostate cancer: NeuroSAFE PROOF—Trial in progress.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS262-TPS262
Author(s):  
Eoin Dinneen ◽  
Jack Grierson ◽  
Aiman Haider ◽  
Alex Freeman ◽  
Jonathan Aning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Frozen Section ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Urinary Continence ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Oncological Safety ◽  
Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Randomised Controlled

TPS262 Background: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) offers cure for localised prostate cancer but is associated with considerable toxicity. Potency and urinary continence are improved when the neurovascular bundles (NVBs) are preserved during a nerve-sparing (NS) RARP. The NeuroSAFE (intra-operative frozen section examination of the neurovascular structure adjacent prostate margin) seeks to promote optimal NS to maximise the opportunity for functional recovery without jeopardising oncological safety. The NeuroSAFE technique in RP has never been evaluated against a standard of care in an randomised controlled trial. Methods: This is a pragmatic, multicentre, single-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) in which men are allocated in a 1:1 ratio to NeuroSAFE RARP or standard RARP. Men in the NeuroSAFE RARP arm will undergo RARP with NS guided by the NeuroSAFE technique. Men in the standard RARP arm will undergo RARP with NS guided by standard current practice (prostate cancer clinical characteristics, multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) recommendations and digital rectal examination (DRE)). Eligible men will have operable localised prostate cancer, will be opting for RARP as primary treatment and will have good baseline erectile function (EF) (as defined by an Internatinoal Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 score >21). The primary outcome is the proportion of men who achieve EF recovery at 12-months according to the IIEF. Oncological safety will be ensured by the independent DMC who will routinely review proportions of men with treatment failure (adjuvant therapy or biochemical recurrence (BCR)) in each arm. A sample size of 404 is estimated required. NeuroSAFE PROOF will continue to follow participant recovery for 5 years following treatment. Key secondary outcomes include patient-reported urinary continence recovery, sexual satisfaction, quality of life, and economic analyses. NeuroSAFE PROOF will be the first RCT of frozen section in radical prostatectomy (RP) in the world. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the National Research Ethics Committee North London (17/LO/1978). Results of this study will be disseminated through national and international papers, and to study participants. Clinical trial information: NCT03317990.

scholarly journals Supported progressive resistance exercise training to counter the adverse side effects of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Ashton ◽  
Jonathan J. Aning ◽  
Garry A. Tew ◽  
Wendy A Robson ◽  
John M Saxton
Keyword(s):  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Muscular Strength ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Resistance Exercise Training ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Aerobic Exercise Capacity ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Purpose To investigate the effects of a supported home-based progressive resistance exercise training (RET) programme on indices of cardiovascular health, muscular strength and health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients after treatment with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods This study was a single-site, two-arm randomised controlled trial, with 40 participants randomised to either the intervention or control group over a 10-month period. In addition to receiving usual care, the intervention group completed three weekly RET sessions using resistance bands for 6 months. Participants performed 3 sets of 12–15 repetitions for each exercise, targeting each major muscle group. The control group received usual care only. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) was the primary outcome and assessed at baseline, 3 and 6 months. Secondary outcomes included body weight, body fat, aerobic fitness, strength and blood-borne biomarkers associated with cardiometabolic risk. Results There was no significant difference between the groups in FMD at 3 or 6 months. However, there were improvements in aerobic exercise capacity (P < 0.01) and upper- (P < 0.01) and lower-limb (P = 0.01) strength in favour of the RET group at 6 months, accompanied by greater weight loss (P = 0.04) and a reduction in body fat (P = 0.02). Improvements in HRQoL were evident in the RET group at 3 and 6 months via the PCa-specific component of the FACT-P questionnaire (both P < 0.01). Five adverse events and one serious adverse event were reported throughout the trial duration. Conclusion This study demonstrates that home-based RET is an effective and safe mode of exercise that elicits beneficial effects on aerobic exercise capacity, muscular strength and HR-QoL in men who have undergone RARP. Trial registration ISRCTN10490647.

scholarly journals Additional Treatments to the Local tumour for metastatic prostate cancer-Assessment of Novel Treatment Algorithms (IP2-ATLANTA): protocol for a multicentre, phase II randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e042953
Author(s):  
Martin John Connor ◽  
Taimur Tariq Shah ◽  
Katarzyna Smigielska ◽  
Emily Day ◽  
Johanna Sukumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Androgen Receptor ◽  
Randomised Controlled Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Prostate Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pelvic Lymph Node ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionSurvival in men diagnosed with de novo synchronous metastatic prostate cancer has increased following the use of upfront systemic treatment, using chemotherapy and other novel androgen receptor targeted agents, in addition to standard androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Local cytoreductive and metastasis-directed interventions are hypothesised to confer additional survival benefit. In this setting, IP2-ATLANTA will explore progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes with the addition of sequential multimodal local and metastasis-directed treatments compared with standard care alone.MethodsA phase II, prospective, multicentre, three-arm randomised controlled trial incorporating an embedded feasibility pilot. All men with new histologically diagnosed, hormone-sensitive, metastatic prostate cancer, within 4 months of commencing ADT and of performance status 0 to 2 are eligible. Patients will be randomised to Control (standard of care (SOC)) OR Intervention 1 (minimally invasive ablative therapy to prostate±pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND)) OR Intervention 2 (cytoreductive radical prostatectomy±PLND OR prostate radiotherapy±pelvic lymph node radiotherapy (PLNRT)). Metastatic burden will be prespecified using the Chemohormonal Therapy Versus Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease (CHAARTED) definition. Men with low burden disease in intervention arms are eligible for metastasis-directed therapy, in the form of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) or surgery. Standard systemic therapy will be administered in all arms with ADT±upfront systemic chemotherapy or androgen receptor agents. Patients will be followed-up for a minimum of 2 years. Primary outcome: PFS. Secondary outcomes include predictive factors for PFS and overall survival; urinary, sexual and rectal side effects. Embedded feasibility sample size is 80, with 918 patients required in the main phase II component. Study recruitment commenced in April 2019, with planned follow-up completed by April 2024.Ethics and disseminationApproved by the Health Research Authority (HRA) Research Ethics Committee Wales-5 (19/WA0005). Study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNCT03763253; ISCRTN58401737

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document