Dynamic risk stratification system in post-lobectomy low-risk and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma patients

2018 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Won Cho ◽  
Yu-mi Lee ◽  
Yi Ho Lee ◽  
Suck Joon Hong ◽  
Jong Ho Yoon
Endocrine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 347-357
Author(s):  
Jiyoung Yoon ◽  
Jung Hyun Yoon ◽  
Kyunghwa Han ◽  
Jandee Lee ◽  
Eun-Kyung Kim ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (9) ◽  
pp. 807-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paritosh Suman ◽  
Chi-Hsiung Wang ◽  
Tricia A. Moo-Young ◽  
Richard A. Prinz ◽  
David J. Winchester

There is no consensus regarding the timing of adjuvant radioactive iodine therapy (RAI) therapy in low- and intermediate-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). We analyzed the impact of adjuvant RAI on overall survival (OS) in low- and intermediate-risk PTC. The National Cancer Data Base was queried from 2004 to 2011 for pN0M0 PTC patients having near/subtotal or total thyroidectomy and adjuvant RAI. Tumors ≤1 cm with negative margins were low risk while 1.1- to 4-cm tumors with negative margins or ≤1 cm with microscopic margins were termed intermediate risk. RAI in ≤3 months and between 3 and 12 months was termed as early and delayed, respectively. Survival analysis was performed after adjusting for patient and tumor-related variables. There were 7,306 low-risk and 16,609 intermediate-risk patients. Seventeen per cent low-risk and 15 per cent intermediate-risk patients had delayed RAI. Kaplan-Meier analysis did not show a difference in OS for early versus delayed RAI administration in low- (10-year OS 94.5% vs 94%, P = 0.627) or intermediate-risk (10-year OS 95.3% vs 95.9%, P = 0.944) patients. In adjusted survival analysis, RAI timing did not affect OS in all patients (hazard ratios = 0.98, 95% confidence interval = 0.71–1.34, P = 0.887). In conclusion, the timing of postthyroidectomy adjuvant RAI therapy does not affect OS in low- or intermediate-risk PTC.


2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (4) ◽  
pp. 636-643 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Mi Lee ◽  
Jae Won Cho ◽  
Suck Joon Hong ◽  
Jong Ho Yoon

Swiss Surgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-68
Author(s):  
Schweizer ◽  
Seifert ◽  
Gemsenjäger

Fragestellung: Die Bedeutung von Lymphknotenbefall bei papillärem Schilddrüsenkarzinom und die optimale Lymphknotenchirurgie werden kontrovers beurteilt. Methodik: Retrospektive Langzeitstudie eines Operateurs (n = 159), prospektive Dokumentation, Nachkontrolle 1-27 (x = 8) Jahre, Untersuchung mit Bezug auf Lymphknotenbefall. Resultate: Staging. Bei 42 Patienten wurde wegen makroskopischem Lymphknotenbefall (cN1) eine therapeutische Lymphadenektomie durchgeführt, mit pN1 Status bei 41 (98%) Patienten. Unter 117 Patienten ohne Anhalt für Lymphknotenbefall (cN0) fand sich okkulter Befall bei 5/29 (17%) Patienten mit elektiver (prophylaktischer) Lymphadenektomie, und bei 2/88 (2.3%) Patienten ohne Lymphadenektomie (metachroner Befall) (p < 0.005). Lymphknotenrezidive traten (1-5 Jahre nach kurativer Primärtherapie) bei 5/42 (12%) pN1 und bei 3/114 (2.6%) cN0, pN0 Tumoren auf (p = 0009). Das 20-Jahres-Überleben war bei TNM I + II (low risk) Patienten 100%, d.h. unabhängig vom N Status; pN1 vs. pN0, cN0 beeinflusste das Überleben ungünstig bei high risk (>= 45-jährige) Patienten (50% vs. 86%; p = 0.03). Diskussion: Der makroskopische intraoperative Lymphknotenbefund (cN) hat Bedeutung: - Befall ist meistens richtig positiv (pN1) und erfordert eine ausreichend radikale, d.h. systematische, kompartiment-orientierte Lymphadenektomie (Mikrodissektion) zur Verhütung von - kurablem oder gefährlichem - Rezidiv. - Okkulter Befall bei unauffälligen Lymphknoten führt selten zum klinischen Rezidiv und beeinflusst das Überleben nicht. Wir empfehlen eine weniger radikale (sampling), nur zentrale prophylaktische Lymphadenektomie, ohne Risiko von chirurgischer Morbidität. Ein empfindlicherer Nachweis von okkultem Befund (Immunhistochemie, Schnellschnitt von sampling Gewebe oder sentinel nodes) erscheint nicht rational. Bei pN0, cN0 Befund kommen Verzicht auf 131I Prophylaxe und eine weniger intensive Nachsorge in Frage.


Author(s):  
Anello Marcello Poma ◽  
David Viola ◽  
Elisabetta Macerola ◽  
Agnese Proietti ◽  
Eleonora Molinaro ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose Recent diagnostic criteria updates of the tall cell variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (TCPTC) by the World Health Organization (WHO) have determined the inclusion of tumours with 30-49% of tall cells. However, the impact of tall cell percentage on papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients’ prognosis is still debated. We aimed to evaluate whether tall cell percentage affects patients’ outcome in the absence of aggressive features. Methods Rates of aggressive features, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant RFS (DRFS) (5-year median follow-up) were compared among tumours with less than 30%, 30-49% and at least 50% of tall cells. We also evaluated the impact of the new tall cell cut-off on patient management. Results Overall, 3092 tumours (15.7% of all PTC) were collected: 792 PTC had less than 30%, 503 had 30-49%, and 1797 had 50% or more tall cell areas. With the new definition of WHO, the number of TCPTC increased by 28%. There were no differences in recurrence rates according to tall cell percentage. The coexistence of BRAF and TERT promoter mutations predicted a worse RFS. Considering the new definition of TCPTC, the level of risk according to the American Thyroid Association increased from low to intermediate in 4.2% of cases. However, the recurrence rate within this subgroup was comparable to low-risk. Conclusions TCPTC and PTC with tall cell areas can be considered as a unique group with similar recurrence risk. However, whenever aggressive features are absent, tumors have a low risk of recurrence independently of tall cell percentage.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document