The influence of titanium base abutments on peri‐implant soft tissue inflammatory parameters and marginal bone loss: A randomized clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 542-548
Author(s):  
Saulo Pamato ◽  
Heitor Marques Honório ◽  
Jorge Alexandre Costa ◽  
Jefferson Luiz Traebert ◽  
Estevam Augusto Bonfante ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Inflammatory Parameters

Influence of abutment disconnection on peri‐implant marginal bone loss: A randomized clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano de Freitas Guimarães Praça ◽  
Renata Cordeiro Teixeira ◽  
Rodrigo Otavio Rego
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss

scholarly journals Influence of Biologically Oriented Preparation Technique on Peri-Implant Tissues; Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial with Three-Year Follow-Up. Part II: Soft Tissues

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Agustín-Panadero ◽  
Naia Bustamante-Hernández ◽  
Carlos Labaig-Rueda ◽  
Antonio Fons-Font ◽  
Lucía Fernández-Estevan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissues ◽  
Clinical Parameters ◽  
Preparation Technique ◽  
Bleeding On Probing ◽  
Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Keratinized Mucosa

Purpose: The objective of this prospective randomized clinical trial (RCT) was to analyze and compare the clinical behavior of three types of prosthesis supported by single implants in the posterior region after three years of functional loading. Materials and methods: Seventy-five implants were divided into three groups according to the type of prosthetic restoration: screw-retained crown (group GS); cemented crown without finishing line (biologically oriented preparation technique) (group GBOPT); and conventional cemented crown with finishing line (group GCC). After three years in function, clinical parameters (presence of keratinized mucosa, probing depths, bleeding on probing, and radiographic bone loss) were compared between the three experimental groups. The possible correlation between soft tissue clinical parameters and bone loss was also analyzed. Results: Statistical analysis found significant differences in clinical parameters between the different types of crown, with the cemented restoration without finishing line (BOPT) presenting fewer complications and better peri-implant health outcomes including: significantly different KMW data (mm), with significant differences between groups GBOPT and GCC (p < 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis test), with GBOPT obtaining larger quantities of keratinized mucosa (KM); statistically significant differences in probing depth (PD) values between groups GBOPT and GCC (p = 0.010, Kruskal–Wallis test); significant differences in bleeding on probing (BOP) between groups GBOPT and GCC (p = 0.018, Chi2 test) in favor of GBOPT. Conclusions: Soft tissue behavior around implants is related to the type of prosthetic restoration used, with cemented prostheses with BOPT presenting better peri-implant soft tissue behavior.

scholarly journals One-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Immediately Loaded Short Implants Placed in the Lower Posterior Single Molar Using a Complete Digital Workflow

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 1282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yeon-Wha Baek ◽  
Young-Jun Lim ◽  
Jungwon Lee ◽  
Ki-Tae Koo ◽  
Myung-Joo Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Insertion Torque ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Model Free ◽  
Short Implants ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Computer Aided

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate immediately loaded single implants with varying lengths in the posterior mandible using a fully digital, model-free prosthetic-driven implant planning pathway, and to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of short and long implants. The 52 patients with the single tooth missing in the posterior molar regions of the mandible were randomly assigned to the control (CMI IS-III active® long implant; 5.0 × 10 mm) and experimental (CMI IS-III active® short implant; 5.5 × 6.6, 7.3, 8.5 mm) groups. For each patient, a single implant was placed using the computer aided surgical template and all prostheses were fabricated by means of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system on the virtual model. The patients received provisional and definitive monolithic zirconia prostheses at 1 week and 12 weeks after implant surgery, respectively. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) measurements and periapical radiographs were taken and peri-implant parameters were evaluated at 1, 3, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks after surgery. Nineteen long implants and 27 short implants were finally used for the statistical analysis. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of insertion torque, ISQ values (except 3 weeks), marginal bone loss, and peri-implant soft tissue parameters (p > 0.05). Both groups exhibited no stability dip during the early phase of healing. The average marginal bone loss from the baseline of implant placement for the control and experimental groups was −0.07 and 0.03 mm after 12 weeks and 0.06 and 0.05 mm after 48 weeks. All of the soft tissue parameters were within normal limits. Within the limits of the short term follow up, immediate loading of short single implants can be considered as one of predictable treatment modality in mandible with reduced bone height when primary stability can be achieved.

scholarly journals Marginal Bone Remodeling around healing Abutment vs Final Abutment Placement at Second Stage Implant Surgery: A 12-month Randomized Clinical Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Younes ◽  
Antoine Berberi ◽  
Nabih Nader ◽  
Maissa Aboulhosn ◽  
Cordahi Manal
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Bone Remodeling ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Stable Connection

ABSTRACT Background The periimplant bone level has been used as one of the criteria to assess the success of dental implants. It has been documented that the bone supporting two-piece implants undergoes resorption first following the second-stage surgery and later on further to abutment connection and delivery of the final prosthesis. Objective The aim of this multicentric randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the crestal bone resorption around internal connection dental implants using a new surgical protocol that aims to respect the biological distance, relying on the benefit of a friction fit connection abutment (test group) compared with implants receiving conventional healing abutments at secondstage surgery (control group). Materials and methods A total of partially edentulous patients were consecutively treated at two private clinics, with two adjacent two-stage implants. Three months after the first surgery, one of the implants was randomly allocated to the control group and was uncovered using a healing abutment, while the other implant received a standard final abutment and was seated and tightened to 30 Ncm. At each step of the prosthetic try-in, the abutment in the test group was removed and then retightened to 30 Ncm. Horizontal bone changes were assessed using periapical radiographs immediately after implant placement and at 3 (second-stage surgery), 6, 9 and 12 months follow-up examinations. Results At 12 months follow-up, no implant failure was reported in both groups. In the control group, the mean periimplant bone resorption was 0.249 ± 0.362 at M3, 0.773 ± 0.413 at M6, 0.904 ± 0.36 at M9 and 1.047 ± 0.395 at M12. The test group revealed a statistically significant lower marginal bone loss of 20.88% at M3 (0.197 ± 0.262), 22.25% at M6 (0.601 ± 0.386), 24.23% at M9 (0.685 ± 0.341) and 19.2% at M9 (0.846 ± 0.454). The results revealed that bone loss increased over time, with the greatest change in bone loss occurring between 3 and 6 months. Alveolar bone loss was significantly greater in the control condition than the test condition. Conclusion The results of this prospective study demonstrated the benefit of placing a prosthetic component with a stable connection at second-stage surgery, in terms of reduced marginal bone remodeling when compared with conventional procedure. Clinical significance. The use of a stable connection in a healing component during try-in stages prior to final restoration placement leads to less periimplant marginal bone loss. How to cite this article Nader N, Aboulhosn M, Berberi A, Manal C, Younes R. Marginal Bone Remodeling around healing Abutment vs Final Abutment Placement at Second Stage Surgery: A 12-month Randomized Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(1):7-15.

Does Apico-Coronal Implant Position Influence Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss? A 36-Month Follow-Up Randomized Clinical Trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. 515-527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilario Pellicer-Chover ◽  
Maria Peñarrocha-Diago ◽  
Amparo Aloy-Prosper ◽  
Luigi Canullo ◽  
Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Implant Position

scholarly journals Peri‐implant marginal bone loss reduction with platform‐switching components: 5‐Year post‐loading results of an equivalence randomized clinical trial

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. 678-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Messias ◽  
Salomão Rocha ◽  
Wilfried Wagner ◽  
Jörg Wiltfang ◽  
Maximilian Moergel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Loss Reduction ◽  
Marginal Bone Loss ◽  
Platform Switching
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document