scholarly journals Use of demand for and spatial flow of ecosystem services to identify priority areas

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (4) ◽  
pp. 860-871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem Verhagen ◽  
Aija S. Kukkala ◽  
Atte Moilanen ◽  
Astrid J.A. van Teeffelen ◽  
Peter H. Verburg
2021 ◽  
Vol 124 ◽  
pp. 553-566
Author(s):  
Yi Wang ◽  
Xiaofeng Wang ◽  
Lichang Yin ◽  
Xiaoming Feng ◽  
Chaowei Zhou ◽  
...  

AMBIO ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Gottwald ◽  
Jana Brenner ◽  
Ron Janssen ◽  
Christian Albert

AbstractPlanning with nature-based solutions (NBS) presents a participatory approach that harnesses actions supported by nature to address societal challenges. Whilst Geodesign may facilitate participatory planning, manage boundaries between participants, and assess impacts of NBS, empirical insights remain scarce. This paper aims to develop and test a Geodesign process for planning with NBS, and to evaluate its contributions to boundary management. In a one-day Geodesign process, eleven stakeholders delineated priority areas, changed land uses, and observed resulting impacts on ecosystem services. Contributions to boundary management were evaluated regarding translation, communication and mediation functions, as well as perceived attributions of credibility, salience, and legitimacy. Results include spatial NBS scenarios and insights into contributions to boundary management: translating scenario stories into maps differed depending on the stakeholders involved; communication can be easily facilitated; yet mediation using an indicator tool led to frustration. Geodesign can indeed facilitate NBS co-design but needs to be integrated into a larger collaborative process.


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
CAROLINE PICHARILLO ◽  
VICTOR EDUARDO LIMA RANIERI

Abstract The economic tool of Payment for Environmental Services (PES) has been considered as an alternative for the conservation of the biodiversity and ecosystem services in private lands. To guide decision makers in implementing PES schemes, this paper aimed to identify in the scientific literature the important elements to prioritize areas in the implementation of PES-biodiversity schemes. It is claimed that the elements extracted from PES-biodiversity schemes must be used as a reference to guide the implementation of other PES schemes based on the recovery and maintenance of natural areas (e.g. water, carbon, environmental aesthetics conditions). Thus, the sustainability of PES schemes can be guaranteed over time.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 2297
Author(s):  
Xiaoyong Li ◽  
Wenhui Kuang ◽  
Fengyun Sun

Climate change and rapid urbanization have severe impacts on urban flood regulation ecosystem services (UFRES). Quantifying the UFRES has attracted increasing attention for urban sustainable development. However, few studies have focused on how to identify urban flood regulation priority areas. In this study, we simulated urban surface runoff by using the soil conservation services-curve number model, and quantified UFRES supply and demand by using relative indicators (i.e., runoff reduction ratio and urban vulnerability) at the subdistrict scale in Beijing, China. Then, an urban flood regulation priority index was developed by integrating UFRES demand and supply, and further used to identify priority areas. The results show that the mean runoff reduction ratio in Beijing decreased from 38.70% (for a 1-year rainfall return period) to 24.74% (for a 100-year rainfall return period). Subdistricts with low UFRES supply were mainly located in the urban central area and the southeastern zone, while subdistricts with high UFRES demand were mainly located in the urban central region. Meanwhile, places with high priority for flood regulation were mainly located in the inner city, and low priority areas were mainly located in northwestern, southwestern, and northeastern Beijing. Our results also imply that the urban flood regulation priority index is an effective indicator to identify urban flood regulation priority areas. These findings could provide urban planners with a comprehensive understanding of UFRES and scientific guidance to improve them.


AMBIO ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Quintas-Soriano ◽  
Dainee M. Gibson ◽  
Jodi S. Brandt ◽  
María D. López-Rodríguez ◽  
Javier Cabello ◽  
...  

AbstractConservation easements are the fastest growing private conservation strategy in the United States. However, mechanisms to assess private land conservation as well as their support by the general public are not well understood. This study uses the ecosystem services framework for assessing existing private lands in Idaho and identifies areas for future conservation easements. Using conservation targets of the land trust as a guide for selecting ecosystem services, we (a) mapped the spatial delivery of conservation targets across public and private lands, (b) explored public awareness in terms of social importance and vulnerability, and (c) mapped future priority areas by characterizing conservation bundles. We found that public lands provided the highest levels of conservation targets, and we found no difference in conservation target provision between private areas and conservation easements. The spatial characterization of conservation target bundles identified potential future priority areas for conservation easements, which can guide planning of land trust conservation efforts.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. e0179008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Howard Goldstein ◽  
Heather Tallis ◽  
Aaron Cole ◽  
Steven Schill ◽  
Erik Martin ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thayná Larissa da Silva Rabêlo Costa ◽  
Guilherme Gerhardt Mazzochini ◽  
Ary Teixeira Oliveira‐Filho ◽  
Gislene Ganade ◽  
Adriana Rosa Carvalho ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document