Redo colorectal anastomosis for rectovaginal fistula following posterior pelvic exenteration – a video vignette

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Vaz Pandini ◽  
Lucas Soares Gerbasi ◽  
Francisco Tustumi ◽  
Marleny Novas Figueiredo de Araújo ◽  
Victor Edmond Seid ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 606-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Kammar ◽  
S. Sasi ◽  
N. Kumar ◽  
J. Rohila ◽  
A. deSouza ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15551-e15551
Author(s):  
Patrizio Damiani ◽  
Francesco Plotti ◽  
Marzio Angelo Zullo ◽  
Carlo De Cicco Nardone ◽  
Roberto Montera ◽  
...  

e15551 Background: The aim of the present study is to describe feasibility, surgical technique, perioperative data, early and late complications of anterior and total pelvic exenteration after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as primary treatment for stage IVa cervical cancer. Methods: It is a retrospective study which included 73 consecutive patients affected by stage IVa cervical cancer who required anterior or total pelvic exenteration referred to 3 international gynaecologic oncology centres. The steps of this extirpative surgical procedure were: 1) staging laparotomy; 2) frozen section biopsy of the paraaortic lymph nodes; 3) systematic lymphadenectomy, radical hysterectomy with adnexectomy and total or anterior pelvic exenteration; 4) continent urinary diversions and low colorectal anastomosis if it was possible. Results: The treatment of patients affected by FIGO stage IVA cervical cancer remains one of the most complex procedures gynecologic oncologists are faced with. Our study focused on clinical and operative data , in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) at 5 years. 5-year OS of our series was 43%. Conclusions: The surgical treatment of stage IVA cervical cancer appears therefore a suitable and valid alternative. Stage IVA cervical cancer patients in good general condition, with a disease resectable with clear surgical margins, should be considered for primary exenteration in referral centers where the surgical experience to perform this procedure is available.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2336-2337
Author(s):  
P. Kavaliauskas ◽  
A. Samant ◽  
A. Dulskas ◽  
J. W. Nunoo‐Mensah

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 397-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matías Jurado ◽  
Juan Luis Alcazar ◽  
Jorge Baixauli ◽  
Jose Luis Hernandez-Lizoain

Objective:To study risk factors for low colorectal anastomotic leak after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies.Methods:Data from 60 patients, 32 with ovarian cancer and 28 with nonovarian cancer who underwent pelvic exenteration with colorectal anastomosis (CRA) were retrospectively analyzed.Results:Overall rate of CRA leak was 20%. The CRA leak was associated with type of tumor (3% for the ovarian cancer and 40.8% for the nonovarian cancer,P= 0.004), CRA height (<5 cm vs ≥5 cm, 75% vs 6.3%;P= 0.001), and previous radiotherapy (RT; 53.3% vs 8.9%;P= 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that only previous RT and CRA height were associated with the CRA leak. Rectosigmoid wall involvement (81.8% vs 27%;P= 0.001) and mesorectum infiltration (69.2% vs 21.7%;P= 0.001) were more frequent among patients with ovarian cancer patients.Conclusion:Previous RT and CRA at or less than 5 cm from the anal verge pose a high risk for CRA leak. In these cases, a definitive colostomy should be recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document