scholarly journals Adaptive comanagement to achieve climate‐ready fisheries

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e12452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jono R. Wilson ◽  
Serena Lomonico ◽  
Darcy Bradley ◽  
Leila Sievanen ◽  
Tom Dempsey ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. S. Fleming ◽  
Benjamin L. Allen ◽  
Guy-Anthony Ballard

Johnson and Ritchie (2012) have provided a criticism of our opinion piece (Fleming et al. 2012). There is some common ground, but we remain unconvinced by their view that our reasoning was unsound or beside the point. In this response, we discuss where Johnson and Ritchie have provided unconvincing evidence to refute our seven considerations, and reiterate and demonstrate why these considerations remain important. The mesopredator release or suppression hypothesis in Australian ecosystems must be objectively evaluated before positive management of dingoes and other free-ranging dogs is recommended or implemented. Adaptive comanagement of free-ranging dogs can be used for both biodiversity conservation and the mitigation of livestock predation but caution must be exercised when considering using free-ranging dogs as a conservation tool.


2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron Childs ◽  
Abigail M. York ◽  
Dave White ◽  
Michael L. Schoon ◽  
Gitanjali S. Bodner

2001 ◽  
pp. 293-312
Author(s):  
Carol J. Pierce Colfer ◽  
Ravi Prabhu ◽  
Eva (Lini) Wollenberg ◽  
Cynthia McDougall ◽  
David Edmunds ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Plummer ◽  
Derek R. Armitage ◽  
Rob C. de Loë

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Plummer ◽  
Beatrice Crona ◽  
Derek R. Armitage ◽  
Per Olsson ◽  
Maria Tengö ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hege Westskog ◽  
Grete K. Hovelsrud ◽  
Göran Sundqvist

Abstract Drawing on case studies in 12 Norwegian municipalities, this paper investigates how local context matters for developing national climate adaptation policies that are applicable at the municipal level. Moreover, it explicates which factors constitute this context and how these factors vary across the case municipalities. National climate adaptation policy in Norway can currently be characterized as top down, providing standardized requirements and advice to municipalities. However, Norwegian municipalities vary greatly with respect to physical conditions, organizational resources, and societal needs. They are autonomous to a great extent and are almost solely responsible for developing climate policy and planning within their own territories. Therefore, municipalities adapt national policies to their own context, reflecting local physiographic, organizational, and resource challenges, but these local translations are not fully recognized by national and sectoral actors. This paper underscores that the significant variation in contextual factors between municipalities is not sufficiently addressed and understood by national and sectoral governmental authorities. With the identified variation of the contextual factors across the case municipalities, an adaptive comanagement strategy within a multilevel governance system is suggested as a suitable framework to ensure a proactive approach to local adaptation, that is, mutual understanding and better cooperation between the national and local levels.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document