scholarly journals Adaptive comanagement to achieve climate‐ready fisheries

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e12452 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jono R. Wilson ◽  
Serena Lomonico ◽  
Darcy Bradley ◽  
Leila Sievanen ◽  
Tom Dempsey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Comanagement

scholarly journals Stakeholder participation and sustainable fisheries: an integrative framework for assessing adaptive comanagement processes

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Stöhr ◽  
Cecilia Lundholm ◽  
Beatrice Crona ◽  
Ilan Chabay
Keyword(s):  
Stakeholder Participation ◽  
Sustainable Fisheries ◽  
Integrative Framework ◽  
Adaptive Comanagement

Adaptive Comanagement for Building Resilience in Social?Ecological Systems

2004 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Olsson ◽  
Carl Folke ◽  
Fikret Berkes
Keyword(s):  
Ecological Systems ◽  
Social Ecological Systems ◽  
Adaptive Comanagement ◽  
Social Ecological ◽  
Building Resilience

Cautionary considerations for positive dingo management: a response to the Johnson and Ritchie critique of Fleming et al. (2012)

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. S. Fleming ◽  
Benjamin L. Allen ◽  
Guy-Anthony Ballard
Keyword(s):  
Biodiversity Conservation ◽  
Common Ground ◽  
Mesopredator Release ◽  
Livestock Predation ◽  
Adaptive Comanagement ◽  
Opinion Piece ◽  
Free Ranging

Johnson and Ritchie (2012) have provided a criticism of our opinion piece (Fleming et al. 2012). There is some common ground, but we remain unconvinced by their view that our reasoning was unsound or beside the point. In this response, we discuss where Johnson and Ritchie have provided unconvincing evidence to refute our seven considerations, and reiterate and demonstrate why these considerations remain important. The mesopredator release or suppression hypothesis in Australian ecosystems must be objectively evaluated before positive management of dingoes and other free-ranging dogs is recommended or implemented. Adaptive comanagement of free-ranging dogs can be used for both biodiversity conservation and the mitigation of livestock predation but caution must be exercised when considering using free-ranging dogs as a conservation tool.

scholarly journals Navigating a Murky Adaptive Comanagement Governance Network: Agua Fria Watershed, Arizona, USA

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cameron Childs ◽  
Abigail M. York ◽  
Dave White ◽  
Michael L. Schoon ◽  
Gitanjali S. Bodner
Keyword(s):  
Adaptive Comanagement ◽  
Governance Network

Toward Social Criteria and Indicators for Protected Areas: One Cut on Adaptive Comanagement

2001 ◽  
pp. 293-312
Author(s):  
Carol J. Pierce Colfer ◽  
Ravi Prabhu ◽  
Eva (Lini) Wollenberg ◽  
Cynthia McDougall ◽  
David Edmunds ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protected Areas ◽  
Criteria And Indicators ◽  
Adaptive Comanagement

scholarly journals Adaptive Comanagement and Its Relationship to Environmental Governance

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Plummer ◽  
Derek R. Armitage ◽  
Rob C. de Loë
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Governance ◽  
Adaptive Comanagement

scholarly journals Adaptive Comanagement: a Systematic Review and Analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan Plummer ◽  
Beatrice Crona ◽  
Derek R. Armitage ◽  
Per Olsson ◽  
Maria Tengö ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Adaptive Comanagement

scholarly journals How to Make Local Context Matter in National Advice: Towards Adaptive Comanagement in Norwegian Climate Adaptation

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hege Westskog ◽  
Grete K. Hovelsrud ◽  
Göran Sundqvist
Keyword(s):  
Climate Adaptation ◽  
Contextual Factors ◽  
Local Context ◽  
Governance System ◽  
Physical Conditions ◽  
Proactive Approach ◽  
Adaptive Comanagement ◽  
Societal Needs ◽  
Suitable Framework ◽  
Policy And Planning

Abstract Drawing on case studies in 12 Norwegian municipalities, this paper investigates how local context matters for developing national climate adaptation policies that are applicable at the municipal level. Moreover, it explicates which factors constitute this context and how these factors vary across the case municipalities. National climate adaptation policy in Norway can currently be characterized as top down, providing standardized requirements and advice to municipalities. However, Norwegian municipalities vary greatly with respect to physical conditions, organizational resources, and societal needs. They are autonomous to a great extent and are almost solely responsible for developing climate policy and planning within their own territories. Therefore, municipalities adapt national policies to their own context, reflecting local physiographic, organizational, and resource challenges, but these local translations are not fully recognized by national and sectoral actors. This paper underscores that the significant variation in contextual factors between municipalities is not sufficiently addressed and understood by national and sectoral governmental authorities. With the identified variation of the contextual factors across the case municipalities, an adaptive comanagement strategy within a multilevel governance system is suggested as a suitable framework to ensure a proactive approach to local adaptation, that is, mutual understanding and better cooperation between the national and local levels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document