scholarly journals German S3‐Guideline on the treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris, adapted from EuroGuiDerm – Part 1: Treatment goals and treatment recommendations

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 934-150
Author(s):  
Alexander Nast ◽  
Andreas Altenburg ◽  
Matthias Augustin ◽  
Wolf‐Henning Boehncke ◽  
Peter Härle ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1092-1115
Author(s):  
Alexander Nast ◽  
Andreas Altenburg ◽  
Matthias Augustin ◽  
Wolf‐Henning Boehncke ◽  
Peter Härle ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Matthew Gaskins ◽  
Corinna Dressler ◽  
Ricardo Niklas Werner ◽  
Alexander Nast

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 645-669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Nast ◽  
Lasse Amelunxen ◽  
Matthias Augustin ◽  
Wolf‐­Henning Boehncke ◽  
Corinna Dressler ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Michael Untch ◽  
Peter A. Fasching ◽  
Sara Y. Brucker ◽  
Wilfried Budach ◽  
Carsten Denkert ◽  
...  

AbstractThis yearʼs 17th St. Gallen (SG) Consensus Conference on the Treatment of Patients with Early Breast Cancer (SG-BCC) with the title “Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer” focused on the challenge of targeting the treatment of early breast cancer more specifically to the individual disease situation of each patient. As in previous years, a German working group of leading breast cancer experts discussed the results of the international SG-BCC 2021 in the context of the German guideline. It is helpful to compare the SG recommendations with the recently updated treatment recommendations of the Breast Commission of the German Working Group on Gynaecological Oncology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie e. V., AGO) and the S3 guideline because the SG-BCC panel comprised experts from different countries, which is why country-specific aspects can be incorporated into the SG recommendations. The German treatment recommendations of the AGO and the S3 guideline are based on current evidence. Nevertheless, any therapeutic decision must always undergo a risk-benefit analysis for the specific situation and to be discussed with the patient.


Author(s):  
Alexander Nast ◽  
Matthias Augustin ◽  
Wolf-Henning Boehncke ◽  
Joachim Klaus ◽  
Ulrich Mrowietz ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 806-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Nast ◽  
Lasse Amelunxen ◽  
Matthias Augustin ◽  
Wolf-Henning Boehncke ◽  
Corinna Dressler ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Fried-Oken

A new procedure entitled the Double Administration Naming Technique is proposed to assist the clinician in obtaining qualitative information about a client's visual confrontation naming skills. It involves the administration of the standard naming test followed by a readministration of the instrument. A series of naming cues then are presented. By examining the number and types of naming errors produced during the two test presentations, the clinician distinguishes word-finding problems from expressive vocabulary limitations and qualitatively describes the language disorder. The cues that facilitate correct naming are used to plan effective treatment goals.


2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 66-70
Author(s):  
Jennifer Walz Garrett

Abstract School-based speech-language pathologists assess students to establish eligibility, collect baselines for treatment goals, determine progress during intervention and verify generalization of skills. Selecting appropriate assessment tools and methods can be challenging due to time constraints, agency regulations, and availability of tests. This article will describe legal considerations, types of assessments, and the factors involved with the selection and use of various assessment procedures and tools. In addition, speech-language pathologists will learn to calculate words correct per minute (WCPM) and perform miscue analysis, which can provide additional language and literacy information about a child's educational needs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document