Freehand magnetic needle guidance technology for intra‐articular cervical injection in horses

Author(s):  
P. Crecente ◽  
D. Argüelles ◽  
M. Cifuentes
2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 77
Author(s):  
Derek Cool ◽  
Shi Sherebrin ◽  
Jonathan Izawa ◽  
Joseph Chin ◽  
Aaron Fenster

Introduction: Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy (Bx) is currently confined to 2D information to both target and record 3D Bx locations. Accurate placement of Bx needles cannot be verified without 3D information, and recording Bx sites in 2D does not provide sufficient information to accurately guide the high incidence of repeat Bx. We have designed a 3D TRUS prostate Bx system that augments the current 2D TRUS system and provides tools for biopsy-planning, needle guidance, and recording of the biopsy core locations entirely in 3D. Methods: Our Bx system displays a 3D model of the patient’s prostate, which is generated intra-procedure from a collection of 2D TRUS images, representative of the particular prostate shape. Bx targets are selected, needle guidance is facilitated, and 3D Bx sites are recorded within the 3D context of the prostate model. The complete 3D Bx system was validated, in vitro, by performing standard ten-core Bx on anatomical phantoms of two patient’s prostates. The accuracy of the needle-guidance, Bx location recording, and 3D model volume and surface topology were validated against a CT gold standard. Results: The Bx system successfully reconstructed the 3D patient prostate models with a mean volume error of 3.2 ± 7.6%. Using the 3D system, needles were accurately guided to the pre-determined targets with a mean error of 2.26 ± 1.03 mm and the 3D locations of the Bx cores were accurately recorded with a mean distance error of 1.47 ± 0.79 mm. Conclusion: We have successfully developed a 3D TRUS prostate biopsy system and validated the system in vitro. A pilot study has been initiated to apply the system clinically.


This report commences with a description of the iron steam-vessel, the “Garryowen,” belonging to the City of Dublin Steam Packet Company, and built by the Messrs. Laird, of Liverpool. She is constructed of malleable iron, is 281 tons burthen, and draws only 5 1/4 feet water, although the weight of iron in the hull, machinery, &c. is 180 tons. This vessel was placed under the directions of the author, in Tarbert Bay, on the Shannon, on the 19th of October, 1835, for the purpose of investigating its local attractions on the compass. The methods which were adopted with that view are given ; together with tables of the results of the several experiments, and plans of the various parts of the Garryowen. The horizontal deflections of the magnetic needle at different situations in the vessel were observed, for the purpose of ascertaining the most advantageous place for a steering compass, and also for the application of Professor Barlow’s correcting plate : and the dip and intensity in these situations were, at the same time, noted.


In this paper Captain Sabine shows in what respect the effects of local attraction in the above-mentioned ships were conformable to observations made in previous voyages; and how far the errors found to take place on different courses, and under different dips of the magnetic needle, corresponded with those rules for calculating corrections recommended by Captain Flinders, who found that in every ship a compass would differ very materially from itself on being removed from one place to another, and this was found to be the case in the Isabella and Alexander. As the ships ascended Davis’s Straits, the binnacle compasses, in consequence of their construction, became nearly useless; accordingly, a standard compass was placed in the Isabella exactly amidship between the main and mizen mast, on a stout cross-beam, about nine feet above the deck; and in the Alexander amidship, on a box of sand five or six feet above deck. Captain Sabine next describes the methods by which the points of no error in these compasses were determined, and which were not in either ship coincident with the magnetic meridian.


1989 ◽  
Vol 60 (9) ◽  
pp. 3047-3050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Chu ◽  
Rolf Hilfiker
Keyword(s):  

In the first letter, dated from Alford, Dec. 15, 1829, the author gives a description of the instrument which was furnished to him by the Royal Society for measuring the variation of the magnetic needle, and also the magnetic intensity; and of his mode of using it. The needle was so delicately suspended as to render changes in the declination as small as 10'´ very sensible. In his experiments on the magnetic intensity, the intervals of time occupied in the needle’s performing 50 oscillations, commencing with an arc of 12°, were noted by a stop-watch, in which the stop, being applied on the ba­lance, is instantaneous in its operation. The watch is again released from the stop at the commencement of a new observation; thus com­pensating, on the principle of the repeating circle, for any inaccuracy in the reading off, or any inequality in the divisions of the dialplate. The observations made on an Aurora borealis which appeared on the night of the 14th of December, are particularly detailed. On that occasion, the disturbance of the magnetic declination was so great, and so frequently changing from east to west, and the reverse, as to leave no doubt in the mind of the author of the reality of this influence. The needle, however, was affected at those times only when the fringes of the aurora were in such a position as to include the needle in their planes. It appeared to him, also, that the side towards which the needle declined, was the quarter where the aurora gave out the most vivid light.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (05) ◽  
pp. 386-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Bergamino ◽  
Ruth Sanders ◽  
Ursula Fogarty ◽  
Antonella Puggioni ◽  
Clodagh Kearney ◽  
...  

Summary Objectives: To compare the accuracy and distribution of injectate for cranial (CR) and caudomedial (CM) ultrasound-guided injections of equine sacroiliac joints. Methods: Both sacroiliac joints from 10 lumbo sacropelvic specimens were injected using cranial parasagittal (CR; curved 18 gauge, 25 cm spinal needles) and caudomedial (CM; straight 18 gauge, 15 cm spinal needles) ultrasound-guided approaches. Injectate consisted of 4 ml iodinated contrast and 2 ml methylene blue. Computed tomo-graphical (CT) scans were performed before and after injections. Time for needle guidance and repositioning attempts were recorded. The CT sequences were analysed for accuracy and distribution of contrast. Results: Intra-articular contrast was detected in sacroiliac joints following 15/40 injections. The CR and CM approaches deposited injectate ≤ 2 cm from sacroiliac joint margins following 17/20 and 20/20 injections, respectively. Median distance of closest contrast to the sacroiliac joint was 0.4 cm (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.5 cm) for CR approaches and 0.6 cm (IQR: 0.95 cm) for CM approaches. Cranial injections resulted in injectate contacting lumbosacral intertrans-verse joints 15/20 times. Caudomedial injections were perivascular 16/20 times. Limitations: Safety and efficacy could not be established. Clinical relevance: Cranial and CM ultra-sound-guided injections targeting sacroiliac joints were very accurate for periarticular injection, but accuracy was poor for intra- articular injection. Injectate was frequently found in contact with interosseous sacroiliac ligaments, as well as neurovascular and synovial structures in close vicinity of sacroiliac joints.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document