AbstractAlternative reproductive tactics occur when individuals of the same sex have a suite of morphological and/or behavioural traits that allow them to pursue different reproductive strategies. A common pattern is e.g. the existence of “courter” and “sneaker” tactics within males. We have previously argued that alternative reproductive tactics should be subject to genetic conflict over the phenotypic expression of traits, similar to sexual antagonism. In this process, which we called intra-locus tactical conflict, genetically determined tactics experience conflicting selection on a shared phenotypic trait, such as body size, but a positive genetic correlation between tactics in body size prevents either tactic from reaching its optimum. Recently, other authors have attempted to extend this idea to developmentally plastic alternative reproductive tactics, with mixed results. However, it is not clear whether we should expect intra-locus tactical conflict in developmentally plastic tactics or not. We have therefore run a series of simulation models investigating under what conditions we should expect to see positive estimates of the inter-tactical genetic correlation, since a positive genetic correlation is a prerequisite for the existence of intra-locus tactical conflict. We found that for autosomal, X-linked, and Y-linked genetically-determined tactics, estimated inter-tactical genetic correlations were generally high. However, for developmentally plastic tactics, the genetic correlation depends on the properties of the switching threshold between tactics. If it is fixed, then estimated genetic correlations are positive, but if there is genetic variation in the switch-point, then any sign and magnitude of estimated genetic correlation is possible, even for highly heritable traits where the true underlying correlation is perfect. This means that caution should be used when investigating genetic constraints in plastic phenotypes.
Sexual antagonism in haplodiploids
