scholarly journals LA‐ICP‐MS/MS Single Spot Rb‐Sr Dating

Author(s):  
Delia Rösel ◽  
Thomas Zack
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delia Rösel ◽  
Thomas Zack
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 119 ◽  
pp. 106822
Author(s):  
Thea Bechshoft ◽  
Yan Luo ◽  
Alyssa M. Bohart ◽  
Andrew E. Derocher ◽  
Evan S. Richardson ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (9) ◽  
pp. 1579-1587 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konrad Löhr ◽  
Heike Traub ◽  
Antje Jutta Wanka ◽  
Ulrich Panne ◽  
Norbert Jakubowski

A comparison of single cell LA-ICP-MS imaging and single spot analysis highlights the advantages of both methods.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Rembe ◽  
Renjie Zhou ◽  
Edward R. Sobel ◽  
Jonas Kley ◽  
Rasmus Thiede

<p>Rutile is frequently found in metamorphic and less commonly in igneous rocks, as well as sediments derived from the former rock types. It may contain enough U (typically up to ~100ppm) to be dated by U/Pb geochronology. In detrital studies, rutile U/Pb ages supplement zircon U/Pb data, as zircon age peaks often reflect magmatic activity, while rutile U/Pb age peaks can be connected to metamorphic events. Using Zr-in-rutile thermometry, one could also estimate metamorphic facies of the terrane, from which detrital rutile grains are derived. Zircon U/Pb dating provides usually a crystallization age, while rutile gives cooling ages that are dependent on the size of the diffusion domain and its cooling rate. The closure temperature has been estimated at ca. 600°C. A major challenge of rutile U/Pb geochronology is the variable amount of common Pb present and most rutile dating requires the correction for common Pb. A widely used method is the Stacey & Kramers approach, which estimates a formation age for a group of rutile grains and assigns them an age-dependent initial Pb isotope composition from the terrestrial Pb evolution curve (Stacey and Kramers, 1975). We present detrital rutile U/Pb data measured by Laser Ablation Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) from Mesozoic and Cenozoic units in the North Pamir in Central Asia. The laser ablation system obtains a time resolved signal of all required isotopes. Using data reduction schemes in Iolite (Paton et al., 2011) and VizualAge (Petrus and Kamber, 2012), the signal is routinely integrated to a single spot age for each ablation pit. Following a similar approach for apatite (Stockli et al., 2017), we subdivided the signal of each single spot into several time-slices and obtained data that crosses diffusion domains or compositional zones within a single rutile grain. Time slices in most cases are aligned along a Discordia in the Tera-Wasserburg diagram, enabling us to calculate a lower intercept age and initial 207Pb/206Pb ratio. We also discuss similarities and differences between these internally corrected ages and the Stacey & Kramers approach-corrected ages.</p><p> </p><p>Paton, C., Hellstrom, J., Paul, B., Woodhead, J., Hergt, J., 2011. Iolite: Freeware for the visualisation and processing of mass spectrometric data. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 26 (12), 2508–2518.</p><p>Petrus, J.A., Kamber, B.S., 2012. VizualAge: A Novel Approach to Laser Ablation ICP-MS U-Pb Geochronology Data Reduction. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 36 (3), 247–270.</p><p>Stacey, J.S., Kramers, J.D., 1975. Approximation of terrestrial lead isotope evolution by a two-stage model. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 26 (2), 207–221.</p><p>Stockli, D.F., Boyd, P., Galster, F., 2017. Intra-grain common Pb correction in apatite by LA-ICP-MS depth profiling and implications for detrital apatite U-Pb dating. EGU General Assembly Abstract Volume.</p><p> </p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Walters ◽  
Alicia Cruz-Uribe ◽  
Won Joon Song ◽  
Christopher Gerbi ◽  
Kimberley Biela

Titanite is a potentially powerful U-Pb petrochronometer that may record metamorphism, metasomatism, and deformation. Titanite may also incorporate significant inherited Pb, the correction for which may introduce inaccuracies and result in geologically ambiguous U-Pb dates. Here we present laser ablation inductively coupled mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS)-derived titanite U-Pb dates and trace element concentrations for two banded calc-silicate gneisses from south-central Maine, USA (SSP18-1A & -1B). Single spot common Pb-corrected dates range from 400 to 280 Ma with 12–20 Ma propagated 2SE. Titanite in sample SSP18-1B exhibit regular core-to-rim variations in texture, composition, and date. We identify four titanite populations: 1) 399 ± 5 Ma (95 % CL) low Y + HREE cores and mottled grains, 2) 372 ± 7 Ma high Y + REE mantles and cores, 3) 342 ± 6 Ma cores with high Y + REE and no Eu anomaly, and 4) 295 ± 6 Ma LREE-depleted rims. We interpret the increase in titanite Y + HREE between ca. 400 and ca. 372 Ma to constrain the timing of diopside fracturing and recrystallization and amphibole breakdown. Apparent Zr-in-titanite temperatures (803 ± 36 °C at 0.5 ± 0.2 GPa) and increased XDi suggest a thermal maximum at ca. 372 Ma. Population 3 domains dated to ca. 342 Ma exhibit no Eu anomaly and are observed only in compositional bands dominated by diopside (> 80 vol %), suggesting limited equilibrium between titanite and plagioclase. Finally, low LREE and high U/Th in Population 4 titanite date the formation of hydrous phases, such as allanite, during high XH2O fluid infiltration at ca. 295 Ma. In contrast to the well-defined date-composition-texture relationships observed for titanite from SSP18-1B, titanite grains from sample SSP18-1A exhibit complex zoning patterns and little correlation between texture, composition, and date. We hypothesize that the incorporation of variable amounts of radiogenic Pb from dissolved titanite into recrystallized domains resulted in mixed ages spanning 380–330 Ma. Although titanite may reliably record multiple phases of metamorphism, these data highlight the importance of considering U-Pb data along with chemical and textural data to screen for inherited radiogenic Pb.


Planta Medica ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Kho ◽  
M Kim ◽  
NY Park ◽  
H Park ◽  
JH Shin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document