Mobbing behaviour in a passerine community increases with prevalence in predator diet

Ibis ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 324-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mylene Dutour ◽  
Jean-Paul Lena ◽  
Thierry Lengagne
2008 ◽  
Vol 331 (9) ◽  
pp. 686-691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elsa Bonnaud ◽  
Eric Vidal ◽  
Diane Zarzoso-Lacoste ◽  
Franck Torre
Keyword(s):  

Ibis ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 148 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
INDRIKIS KRAMS ◽  
TATJANA KRAMA ◽  
KRISTINE IGAUNE

UQ eSpace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Kearney ◽  
Alex Kutt
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 89 ◽  
pp. 84-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niccolò Fattorini ◽  
Lucia Burrini ◽  
Giovanni Morao ◽  
Francesco Ferretti ◽  
Giorgia Romeo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Andrée Giroux ◽  
Myriam Trottier-Paquet ◽  
Joël Bêty ◽  
Vincent Lamarre ◽  
Nicolas Lecomte

Predation is one of the main factors explaining nesting mortality in most bird species. Birds can avoid nest predation or reduce predation pressure by breeding at higher latitude, showing anti-predator behaviour, and nesting in association with protective species. Plovers actively defend their territory by displaying early warning and aggressive/mobbing behaviour, potentially benefiting the neighbouring nests by decreasing their predation risk. To test for the existence of such a protective effect, we studied the influence of proximity to plover nests on predation risk of artificial nests on Igloolik Island (Nunavut, Canada) in July 2014. We predicted that the predation risk of artificial nests increases and decreases with the distance to and the density of plover nests, respectively. We monitored 18 plover nests and set 35 artificial nests at 30, 50, 100, 200 and 500 m from seven of those plover nests. Surprisingly, we showed that predation risk of artificial nests increases with the density of active plover nests. We also found a significant negative effect of the distance to the nearest active protector nest on predation risk of artificial nests. Understanding how the composition and structure of shorebird communities generate spatial patterns in predation risks represent a key step to better understand the importance of these species of conservation concern in tundra food webs.


2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (9) ◽  
pp. 1857-1864 ◽  
Author(s):  
José C. Xavier ◽  
Richard A. Phillips ◽  
Yves Cherel

AbstractXavier, J. C., Phillips, R. A., and Cherel, Y. 2011. Cephalopods in marine predator diet assessments: why identifying upper and lower beaks is important. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68: 1857–1864. Cephalopods are components of the diet of many predators worldwide. They are identified mainly using their chitinized upper and lower beaks, but because it has been assumed that the number of upper and lower beaks would be the same in predator diet samples, more effort has been put into creating keys for the lower beaks, which are more easily identifiable from morphology. A test is made of whether the number of upper and lower beaks differs in diet samples collected from a major cephalopod predator, the wandering albatross (Diomedea exulans), potential biases in the estimation of predator diets are assessed, and upper:lower beak ratios in published studies of other seabirds, seals, whales, and fish from different parts of the world reviewed. The ratio of upper to lower beaks in diet samples from wandering albatrosses varied greatly in a single year (from 69.6% more lower beaks to 59% more upper beaks), and between years (from 0.5 to 32.1% more upper beaks), and biases were greater for certain cephalopod species, resulting in underestimation of their relative importance. Future studies need to consider using both upper and lower beaks to improve the assessment of the contribution of different cephalopods to predator diets.


Author(s):  
Dylan Stompe ◽  
◽  
Jason Roberts ◽  
Carlos Estrada ◽  
David Keller ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 160151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Eckenweber ◽  
Mirjam Knörnschild

Distress calls signal extreme physical distress, e.g. being caught by a predator. In many bat species, distress calls attract conspecifics. Because bats often occupy perennial day-roosts, they might adapt their responsiveness according to the social relevance in which distress calls are broadcast. Specifically, we hypothesized that conspecific distress calls broadcast within or in proximity to the day-roost would elicit a stronger responsiveness than distress calls broadcast at a foraging site. We analysed the distress calls and conducted playback experiments with the greater sac-winged bat, Saccopteryx bilineata , which occupies perennial day-roosts with a stable social group composition. S. bilineata reacted significantly differently depending on the playback's location. Bats were attracted to distress call playbacks within the day-roost and in proximity to it, but showed no obvious response to distress call playbacks at a foraging site. Hence, the bats adapted their responsiveness towards distress calls depending on the social relevance in which distress calls were broadcast. Distress calls within or in proximity to the day-roost are probably perceived as a greater threat and thus have a higher behavioural relevance than distress calls at foraging sites, either because bats want to assess the predation risk or because they engage in mobbing behaviour.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document