Validation of the Australian version of the Chronic Kidney Disease Self‐Management instrument

Author(s):  
Colette Wembenyui ◽  
Clint Douglas ◽  
Ann Bonner
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiu-Chu Lin ◽  
Chia-Chen Wu ◽  
Li-Min Wu ◽  
Hsing-Mei Chen ◽  
Shu-Chen Chang

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Al Sawad Ayat Ali ◽  
Soo Kun Lim ◽  
Li Yoong Tang ◽  
Aneesa Abdul Rashid ◽  
Boon-How Chew

Abstract Background: There is growing evidence that self‐management behaviour can improve outcomes for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, there are no measures available in Malay to effectively assess self-management of CKD. The aim of this study was to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Malay Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management (MCKD-SM) for Malay-speaking health professionals and patients. Methods: This study was carried out in two phases: translation and cultural adaptation, and validation. Instruments were translated from English to Malay then adapted and validated in a sample of 337 patients with CKD stages 3-4 attending a nephrology clinic in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Construct validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis. Reliability of the instrument was assessed by internal consistency and test‐retest reliability. The correlations between MCKD-SM and kidney disease knowledge, MCKD-SM and self-efficacy were hypothesised a priori and investigated. Results: The Malay version of the Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management instrument has 29 items grouped into three factors: “Understanding and Managing my CKD”, “Seeking Support” and “Adherence to Recommended Regimen”. The three factors accounted for 56.3 % of the total variance. Each factor showed acceptable internal reliability with Cronbach’s α from 0.885-0.960. 2-week intra-rater test-retest reliability intraclass correlation coefficient values for all items ranged between 0.938 to 1.000. MCKD-SM scores significantly correlates with kidney disease knowledge (r = 0.366, p < 0.01) and self-efficacy (r = 0.212, p < 0.01).Conclusion: The Malay version of the CKD-SM was found to be a valid and reliable patient‐reported outcome measure of pre-dialysis CKD self-management behaviour in the Malay-speaking population.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e044059
Author(s):  
Hongxia Shen ◽  
Rianne M J J van der Kleij ◽  
Paul J M van der Boog ◽  
Wenjiao Wang ◽  
Xiaoyue Song ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo support the adaptation and translation of an evidence-based chronic kidney disease (CKD) self-management intervention to the Chinese context, we examined the beliefs, perceptions and needs of Chinese patients with CKD and healthcare professionals (HCPs) towards CKD self-management.DesignA basic interpretive, cross-sectional qualitative study comprising semistructured interviews and observations.SettingOne major tertiary referral hospital in Henan province, China.Participants11 adults with a diagnosis of CKD with CKD stages G1–G5 and 10 HCPs who worked in the Department of Nephrology.ResultsFour themes emerged: (1) CKD illness perceptions, (2) understanding of and motivation towards CKD self-management, (3) current CKD practice and (4) barriers, (anticipated) facilitators and needs towards CKD self-management. Most patients and HCPs solely mentioned medical management of CKD, and self-management was largely unknown or misinterpreted as adherence to medical treatment. Also, the majority of patients only mentioned performing disease-specific acts of control and not, for instance, behaviour for coping with emotional problems. A paternalistic patient–HCP relationship was often present. Finally, the barriers, facilitators and needs towards CKD self-management were frequently related to knowledge and environmental context and resources.ConclusionsThe limited understanding of CKD self-management, as observed, underlines the need for educational efforts on the use and benefits of self-management before intervention implementation. Also, specific characteristics and needs within the Chinese context need to guide the development or tailoring of CKD self-management interventions. Emphasis should be placed on role management and emotional coping skills, while self-management components should be tailored by addressing the existing paternalistic patient–HCP relationship. The use of electronic health innovations can be an essential facilitator for implementation.


2021 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S37-S40
Author(s):  
Irsanty Collein ◽  
Ratna Sitorus ◽  
Krisna Yetti ◽  
Sutanto Priyo Hastono

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Esmaeel Toni ◽  
Habibollah Pirnejad ◽  
Khadijeh Makhdoomi ◽  
Azam Mivefroshan ◽  
Zahra Niazkhani

Abstract Background To improve chronic disease outcomes, self-management is an effective strategy. An electronic personal health record (ePHR) is a promising tool with the potential to support chronic patient’s education, counseling, and self-management. Fitting ePHRs within the daily practices of chronic care providers and chronic patients requires user-centered design approaches. We aimed to understand users’ needs and requirements in chronic kidney disease (CKD) care to consider in the design of an ePHR to facilitate its implementation, adoption, and use. Methods A qualitative study was conducted in a major Iranian nephrology center including inpatient and outpatient settings in 2019. We conducted 28 semi-structured interviews with CKD patients, nurses, and adult nephrologists. To confirm or modify the requirements extracted from the interviews, a focus group was also held. Data were analyzed to extract especially those requirements that can facilitate implementation, adoption, and sustained use based on the PHR adoption model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Results Participants requested an ePHR that provides access to up to date patient information, facilitates patient-provider communication, and increases awareness about patient individualized conditions. Participants expected a system that is able to cater to low patient e-health literacy and high provider workload. They requested the ePHR to include purposeful documentation of medical history, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, tailored educational content, and scheduled care reminders. Messaging function, tailored educational content to individual patients’ conditions, and controlled access to information were highly valued in order to facilitate its implementation, adoption, and use. Conclusions We focused on the ePHR’s content and functionalities in the face of facilitators and/or barriers envisioned for its adoption in nephrology care. Designers and implementers should value CKD patients’ needs and requirements for self-management such as providing personalized education and counseling (on the basis of their condition and risk factors), health literacy, and disease progression levels. The socio-technical aspects of care also need further attention to facilitate ePHR’s adoption.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document