scholarly journals End-stage renal disease, dialysis, kidney transplantation and their impact on CD4+T-cell differentiation

Immunology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 155 (2) ◽  
pp. 211-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Schaier ◽  
Angele Leick ◽  
Lorenz Uhlmann ◽  
Florian Kälble ◽  
Christian Morath ◽  
...  
Vaccines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 133
Author(s):  
Claudia Sommerer ◽  
Anita Schmitt ◽  
Angela Hückelhoven-Krauss ◽  
Thomas Giese ◽  
Thomas Bruckner ◽  
...  

Introduction: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation occurs in seronegative patients after solid organ transplantation (SOT) particularly from seropositive donors and can be lethal. Generation of CMV-specific T cells helps to prevent CMV reactivation. Therefore, we initiated a clinical phase I CMVpp65 peptide vaccination trial for seronegative end-stage renal disease patients waiting for kidney transplantation. Methods: The highly immunogenic nonamer peptide NLVPMVATV derived from CMV phosphoprotein 65(CMVpp65) in a water-in-oil emulsion (Montanide™) plus imiquimod (Aldara™) as an adjuvant was administered subcutaneously four times biweekly. Clinical course as well as immunological responses were monitored using IFN-γ ELISpot assays and flow cytometry for CMV-specific CD8+ T cells. Results: Peptide vaccination was well tolerated, and no drug-related serious adverse events were detected except for Grade I–II local skin reactions. Five of the 10 patients (50%) mounted any immune response (responders) and 40% of the patients presented CMV-specific CD8+ T cell responses elicited by these prophylactic vaccinations. No responders experienced CMV reactivation in the 18 months post-transplantation, while all non-responders reactivated. Conclusion: CMVpp65 peptide vaccination was safe, well tolerated, and clinically encouraging in seronegative end-stage renal disease patients waiting for kidney transplantation. Further studies with larger patient cohorts are planned.


2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 427-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Myung Hyun Lee ◽  
Kyung Min Ko ◽  
Seung Won Ahn ◽  
Myoung Nam Bae ◽  
Bum Soon Choi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1075-1079 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yosuke Suzuki ◽  
Fumihiko Katagiri ◽  
Fuminori Sato ◽  
Kanako Fujioka ◽  
Yukie Sato ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoltán Kaló ◽  
Jeno Járay ◽  
Júlia Nagy

Background— Kidney transplantation is generally acknowledged as the more clinically effective and more cost-effective option in managing patients with end-stage renal disease, compared with dialysis. This study looked for confirmatory evidence in a Hungarian population. Methods— Patients (n = 242) with end-stage renal disease who received cadaveric kidney transplantation during 1994 were followed up for 3 years. They were compared with patients (n = 840) receiving hemodialysis who were on a waiting list for transplantation. Data were collected retrospectively. Treatments were compared for clinical efficacy and for cost-effectiveness. Results— At month 36, the standard mortality hazard function was 3.5 times higher in the group receiving hemodialysis ( P<.0001) than in the transplant recipients. Average treatment costs per patient over the 3 years were also significantly higher ( P<.0001) in the hemodialysis group than in the group that received transplants. The cost of 1 year gained by transplantation was significantly less ( P<.0001) than the cost associated with hemodialysis. Conclusions— Compared with hemodialysis, kidney transplantation provides greater survival benefits to patients with end-stage renal disease, at less cost.


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 392-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Jeong Ko ◽  
Jaeseok Yang ◽  
Curie Ahn ◽  
Myoung Soo Kim ◽  
Duck Jong Han ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document