The Public Health Nursing Practice Manual: A Tool for Public Health Nurses

2004 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon D. Sakamoto ◽  
Margaret Avila
2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (20_suppl) ◽  
pp. 53-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Berit Misund Dahl

Aims: Government programs and the Norwegian Directorate of Health give public health nurses in Norway an explicit role in population-based health promotion and disease-prevention work. The aim of this paper is to explore Norwegian public health nurses’ experiences with population-based work. Methods: A phenomenological hermeneutic approach was adopted, involving face-to-face interviews with a purposeful sample of 23 public health nurses from urban and rural districts in two counties in Norway. Results: Three themes were identified: the predominance of work at the individual level, a lack of resources, and adherence to administrative directives. The interviews revealed that the public health nurses were mostly occupied with individual problem-solving activities. Population-based work was hardly prioritized, mostly because of a lack of resources and a lack of recognition of the population-based role of public health nurses. Conclusions:The study indicates contradictions between the public health nursing practice related to population-based work and the direction outlined by the government and the public health nursing curriculum, which may mean that the public health nursing role is not sufficiently clarified. The implementation of practice models and administrative directives and resources, as well as an explicit emphasis on population health in public health nursing education, can contribute to increased population-based interventions. Greater knowledge of and emphasis on population-based work in public health nursing are needed.


1959 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 100
Author(s):  
ETHEL G. BROOKS ◽  
M. EILEEN TOD-HUNTER ◽  
J. HENDRICKSON ELLEN

1964 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 62
Author(s):  
Leah Hoenig ◽  
Ruth B. Freeman

2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pamela Aaltonen ◽  
Elizabeth (Libby) Richards ◽  
Kay Webster ◽  
Lynn Davis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0248330
Author(s):  
Emily Belita ◽  
Jennifer Yost ◽  
Janet E. Squires ◽  
Rebecca Ganann ◽  
Maureen Dobbins

There are professional expectations for public health nurses to develop competencies in evidence-informed decision-making (EIDM) due to its potential for improved client outcomes. Robust tools to assess EIDM competence can encourage increased EIDM engagement and uptake. This study aimed to develop and validate the content of a measure to assess EIDM competence among public health nurses. A four-stage process, based on measure development principles and the Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, was used to develop and refine items for a new EIDM competence measure: a) content coverage assessment of existing measures; b) identification of existing measures for use and development of items; c) validity assessment based on content; d) validity assessment based on response process. An EIDM competence measurement tool consisting of EIDM knowledge, skills, attitudes/beliefs, and behaviour items was developed using conceptual literature and existing measures (Evidence-Based Practice Competency Tool and Evidence-Based Practice Beliefs Scale) to address limitations of existing EIDM tools identified from the content coverage assessment. Item content validity index ratings ranged from 0.64–1.00. Qualitative themes from validity assessment based on content and response process included word changes to improve clarity, reducing item redundancy, separating multi-component items, and ensuring items reflect nursing role expectations. Upon determining its reliability and validity, there is potential for the EIDM competence measure to be used in: public health nursing practice to identify competence gaps and strengths to facilitate professional development activities; in research to support development of strategies to build EIDM capacity; and for curriculum planning and development across nursing education programs.


1962 ◽  
Vol 77 (10) ◽  
pp. 894
Author(s):  
Sam T. Simpson ◽  
John M. McKee ◽  
Geraldine Skipper ◽  
Louise L. Cady

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document