Effects of a metal etchant and two primers on resin bonding durability to titanium

2004 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohsuke Taira ◽  
Hiroaki Yanagida ◽  
Hideo Matsumura ◽  
Mitsuru Atsuta
Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (24) ◽  
pp. 5629
Author(s):  
Sung-Min Kwon ◽  
Bong Ki Min ◽  
Young Kyung Kim ◽  
Tae-Yub Kwon

The influence of residual stress induced by sandblasting the zirconia ceramic surface on the resin bonding to the ceramic is still unclear. The effect of four different sandblasting conditions (with 50 and 110 μm alumina at pressures of 0.2 and 0.4 MPa) on the bonding of adhesive resin cement (Panavia F 2.0) to zirconia (Cercon® ht) was investigated in terms of residual stress. The surface roughness and water contact angle of the zirconia surfaces were measured. The tetragonal-to-monoclinic (t–m) phase transformation and residual stresses (sin2ψ method) were studied by X-ray diffraction. The resin-bonded zirconia specimens were subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) tests before and after thermocycling (10,000 and 30,000 cycles) (n = 10). As the particle size and pressure increased, the roughness gradually and significantly increased (p = 0.023). However, there were no significant differences in roughness-corrected contact angle among all the sandblasted groups (p > 0.05). As the particle size and pressure increased, the m-phase/(t-phase + m-phase) ratios and compressive residual stresses gradually increased. After thermocycling, there were no significant differences in SBS among the sandblasted zirconia groups (p > 0.05). In conclusion, increased surface roughness and residual stress do not directly affect the resin bonding durability.


2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 417-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
JEFFREY R. PIASCIK ◽  
EDWARD J. SWIFT
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 602-612 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Yao ◽  
H Yang ◽  
J Yu ◽  
L Zhang ◽  
Y Zhu ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Objective: This study aimed to investigate the long-term effectiveness of ceramic–resin bonding with universal adhesives in non–silane-pretreated and silane-pretreated modes after 10,000 cycles of thermal aging. Methods and Materials: All Bond Universal, Adhese Universal, Clearfil Universal Bond, and Single Bond Universal were selected. Etched lithium disilicate glass ceramics were prepared, randomly assigned to groups, and pretreated with or without ceramic primer containing silane coupling agent prior to the application of universal adhesive (ie, silane-pretreated or non–silane-pretreated mode). The shear bond strength (SBS), microleakage, and field-emission scanning electron microscopy images of the ceramic–resin interfaces were examined after 24 hours of water storage or 10,000 thermal cycles. Light microscopy and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) were performed to analyze marginal sealing ability. Results: SBS and microleakage percentage were significantly affected by bonding procedure (non–silane-pretreated or silane-pretreated mode) and aging (24 hours or 10,000 thermal cycles). After the universal adhesives in the non–silane-pretreated mode were aged, SBS significantly decreased and microleakage percentage increased. By contrast, the SBS of Adhese Universal, Clearfil Universal Bond, and Single Bond Universal decreased, and the microleakage percentage of all of the adhesives increased in the silane-pretreated mode. However, after aging, the SBS of the silane-pretreated groups were higher and their microleakage percentages lower than those of the non–pretreated groups. In the non–silane-pretreated mode, adhesive failure was dominant and gaps between composite resin and the adhesive layer were significant when observed with CLSM. Conclusions: The simplified procedure reduced the ceramic–resin bonding effectiveness of universal adhesives after aging, and additional silane pretreatment helped improve the long-term durability.


2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
pp. 1287-1290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Kyung Kim ◽  
Jun Sik Son ◽  
Kyo-Han Kim ◽  
Tae-Yub Kwon

BDJ ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 186 (7) ◽  
pp. 328-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
J C Setcos ◽  
M Staninec ◽  
N H F Wilson

2015 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akio Noro ◽  
Atsushi Kameyama ◽  
Akiko Haruyama ◽  
Toshiyuki Takahashi

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Adioro Soetojo ◽  
Ivan Salomo Sumarto ◽  
Moch. Mudjiono ◽  
Cecilia G.J. Lunardhi
Keyword(s):  

Latar belakang: Resin komposit berikatan dengan struktur gigi melalui bahan adesif, yang dikenal dengan sebutan bahan bonding. Bahan bonding biasanya mengandung monomer fungsional yang spesifik pada umumnya adalah ester yang berasal dari reaksi alkohol bivalen dengan asam metakrilat dan phosphor atau derivate asam karboksilat.dalam studi terbaru terdapat ikatan bahan bonding secara kimia. Tujuan: Untuk menganalisis perbedaan kekuatan ikatan kimia antara bahan resin bonding berbahan dasar HEMA berpelarut etanol dan HEMA berpelarut aseton dengan kolagen dentin. Metode: Terdapat 3 kelompok pada penelitian ini. Kelompok pertama HEMA dan kolagen dicampur dengan KBr, kelompok ini sebagai kontrol positif. Kelompok kedua HEMA, etanol, dan kolagen dicampur KBr. Kelompok ketiga HEMA, aseton, dan kolagen dicampur KBr. Ketiga kelompok kemudian dijadikan pellet bening dan dianalisa dengan FTIR,untuk kemudian dihitung nilai puncak pita serapan karbonil dari masing-masing kelompok penelitian. Data dianalisa menggunakan Kruskall Wallis dan Tukey HSD test (p<0.05). Hasil: Nilai Peak (P) pita serapan karbonil kelompok I: 71.36, kelompok II : 46.76, kelompok III : 27.2. Semakin kecil nilai Peak (P) pita serapan karbonil maka diamsusikan semakin besar kekuatan ikatan secara kimia. Kesimpulan: Kekuatan ikatan kimia pada bahan bonding HEMA berpelarut aseton lebih besar dibandingkan dengan berpelarut etanol pada kolagen dentin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document