scholarly journals A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 768-776 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. EAST ◽  
M. STAVRINDIS ◽  
S. THOMAS-GIBSON ◽  
T. GUENTHER ◽  
P. P. TEKKIS ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
pp. AB310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam C. Randolph ◽  
Tony Merrill ◽  
Richard Gerkin ◽  
Francisco C. Ramirez ◽  
Nooman Gilani

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (6) ◽  
pp. 2676-2682 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Richardson ◽  
Anthony Thaventhiran ◽  
Hugh Mackenzie ◽  
Benjamin Stubbs

2009 ◽  
Vol 55 (6) ◽  
pp. 1716-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Burke ◽  
Anuja G. Choure ◽  
Madhusudhan R. Sanaka ◽  
Rocio Lopez

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 583
Author(s):  
Diogo Libânio ◽  
Luís Filipe Azevedo

Although colonoscopy is considered the most accurate test for the investigation of colorectal polyps, lesions ≤ 10 mm may be missed in approximately 10%. Chromoscopy may increase the detection of colorectal polyps. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate the benefit of cromoscopy in colorectal polyps detection. Seven randomized controlled trials were included (incuding 2,727 participants) comparing polyp detection (both neoplastic and non- neoplastic polyps) in patients submitted to conventional colonoscopy or colonoscopy with chromoscopy. Chromoscopy was associated with a significant improvement in all detection endpoints (number of polyps, number of neoplastic polyps, number of diminutive polyps, number of neoplastic diminutive polyps, proportion of patients with at least one polyp and proportion of patients with at least one neoplastic polyp). However, when highdefinition colonoscopes were used in the control group, chromoscopy benefit does not seem to be significant. Besides, routine use of chromoscopy may have implications in the accessibility of colonoscopy and in the effectiveness of screening programs. Moreover, the benefit of chromoscopy in the era of high-definition colonoscopy is questionable.


2011 ◽  
Vol 73 (4) ◽  
pp. AB377
Author(s):  
Arjun Vaid ◽  
Jatin Roper ◽  
Mohamed Alseiari ◽  
Vivian A. Asare ◽  
Roger D. Mitty

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document