scholarly journals Detection of SNPs in bovine immune-response genes that may mediate resistance to the cattle tick Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus

2008 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 328-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. R. R. Abatepaulo ◽  
A. R. Caetano ◽  
C. T. Mendes Jr ◽  
W. A. Carvalho ◽  
B. R. Ferreira ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valli De Re ◽  
Maria Lina Tornesello ◽  
Mariangela De Zorzi ◽  
Laura Caggiari ◽  
Francesca Pezzuto ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 190 (1) ◽  
pp. 169-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoyuki Tsuchiya ◽  
Jun Ohashi ◽  
Katsushi Tokunaga

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Popara ◽  
Margarita Villar ◽  
Lourdes Mateos-Hernández ◽  
Isabel G. Fernández de Mera ◽  
José de la Fuente

Cattle ticks,Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, are a serious threat to animal health and production. Some ticks feed on a single host species while others such asR. microplusinfest multiple hosts. White tailed deer (WTD) play a role in the maintenance and expansion of cattle tick populations. However, cattle ticks fed on WTD show lower weight and reproductive performance when compared to ticks fed on cattle, suggesting the existence of host factors that affect tick feeding and reproduction. To elucidate these factors, a proteomics approach was used to characterize tick and host proteins inR. microplusticks fed on cattle and WTD. The results showed thatR. microplusticks fed on cattle have overrepresented tick proteins involved in blood digestion and reproduction when compared to ticks fed on WTD, while host proteins were differentially represented in ticks fed on cattle or WTD. Although a direct connection cannot be made between differentially represented tick and host proteins, these results suggested that differentially represented host proteins together with other host factors could be associated with higherR. microplustick feeding and reproduction observed in ticks fed on cattle.


1964 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 854 ◽  
Author(s):  
HMD Hoyte

Larval B. microplus were placed on 36 domestic dogs, about half of which were adults and half were puppies. Ticks matured on the adults only. The yield of adult female ticks was very low and variable (average for all dogs, 0.01%); more time was needed to mature than on cattle, and size and egg production were reduced. Most of the resulting larvae matured successfully when placed on cattle. No ticks matured on the small number of young foxes and dingoes which were tested. It is suggested that the unconsidered presence of dogs represents some risk to the success of campaigns to eradicate this tick.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document