Factor structure of the Motivation Assessment Scale

2008 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. N. SINGH ◽  
L. S. DONATELLI ◽  
A. BEST ◽  
D. E. WILLIAMS ◽  
F. J. BARRERA ◽  
...  
1991 ◽  
Vol 68 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1235-1238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elson M. Bihm ◽  
Terri L. Kienlen ◽  
M. Ernest Ness ◽  
Ann R. Poindexter

The rating scale used to assess the motivators of maladaptive behaviors in persons with mental retardation was the Motivation Assessment Scale. In the current study, we validated the factor structure of the scale on a sample of 118 subjects with predominately severe or profound mental retardation. They exhibited deviant behaviors such as self-injurious and tantrum behavior, aggression, and passivity. The results of the factor analysis with varimax rotation validated the assumptions of the developers of the scale that the motivators could be grouped into sensory, escape, attention, and tangible reinforcers. These four subscales are easily interpretable and should continue to provide valuable information.


1997 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa L. Onega ◽  
Ivo L. Abraham

We examined the factor structure of the 28-item Dementia Mood Assessment Scale (DMAS), an instrument to assess depressive symptoms in older adults with cognitive impairment, in a cohort of 165 community-dwelling elderly with varying degrees of cognitive impairment. Factor analysis using principal components analysis and varimax rotation was performed to explore the presence of subscales and examine construct validity. A five-factor structure involving all 28 items accounting for 63.2% of the variance in the DMAS scores was derived. Factors were named: Depressed Affect, Environmental Interaction, Diurnal Patterns, Agitation/Suspicion, and Somatic Indicators. This factor structure reflects the often differing presentations of depressive symptoms in older adults with varying degrees of cognitive function and established the construct validity of the DMAS in this population. We conclude that the DMAS may be used for differentiated clinical assessment of depressive symptoms along major dimensions of depressive illness in this cohort of elderly.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-19
Author(s):  
Velimir Miličković ◽  
Veljko Vukićević ◽  
Stanko Zečević ◽  
Slobodan Vignjević

The aim of the study was to determine the factor structure of the assessment scale of the Physical Education Teacher Attitude Questionnaire, as well as to ascertain the existence of gender, age, and differences in whether students practice some sport outside of school or not, in terms of attitudes toward different physical education teacher competences. A sample of 119 students of both genders, grades 5 through 8, was assigned a USF assessment scale, modeled on existing instruments for assessing student attitudes toward physical education and physical education teachers. The factor structure was determined by using factor analysis. The ANOVA results for gender differences indicate that there are no statistically significant differences in the attitudes of students towards the competences of physical education teachers. ANOVA results for differences between coaching students and non-coaches suggest that there are statistically significant differences between these groups of respondents regarding the factor of socio-emotional competence of teachers, in the sense that students who train a sport are more inclined towards the socio-emotional competences of teachers. The ANOVA results for age differences indicate that there are statistically significant differences between younger and older students, regarding both factors, in the sense that younger students are more inclined towards both the socio-emotional and professional competences of physical education teachers. Attitudes towards the teacher provide valuable information about what students think and feel about them, thus creating adequate conditions for effecting change and improving both teaching and relationships with students.


Author(s):  
Tiffany Hutchins ◽  
Giacomo Vivanti ◽  
Natasa Mateljevic ◽  
Roger J. Jou ◽  
Frederick Shic ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document