scholarly journals Operational feasibility of lot quality assurance sampling (LQAS) as a tool in routine process monitoring of filariasis control programmes

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1256-1263 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Vanamail ◽  
S. Subramanian ◽  
A. Srividya ◽  
R. Ravi ◽  
K. Krishnamoorthy ◽  
...  
Parasitology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 144 (10) ◽  
pp. 1328-1337 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. VAN KESTEREN ◽  
A. MASTIN ◽  
P. R. TORGERSON ◽  
BERMET MYTYNOVA ◽  
P. S. CRAIG

SUMMARYEchinococcosis is a re-emerging zoonotic disease in Kyrgyzstan. In 2012, an echinococcosis control scheme was started that included dosing owned dogs in the Alay Valley, Kyrgyzstan with praziquantel. Control programmes require large investments of money and resources; as such it is important to evaluate how well these are meeting their targets. However, problems associated with echinococcosis control schemes include remoteness and semi-nomadic customs of affected communities, and lack of resources. These same problems apply to control scheme evaluations, and quick and easy assessment tools are highly desirable. Lot quality assurance sampling was used to assess the impact of approximately 2 years of echinococcosis control in the Alay valley. A pre-intervention coproELISA prevalence was established, and a 75% threshold for dosing compliance was set based on previous studies. Ten communities were visited in 2013 and 2014, with 18–21 dogs sampled per community, and questionnaires administered to dog owners. After 21 months of control efforts, 8/10 communities showed evidence of reaching the 75% praziquantel dosing target, although only 3/10 showed evidence of a reduction in coproELISA prevalence. This is understandable, since years of sustained control are required to effectively control echinococcosis, and efforts in the Alay valley should be and are being continued.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. e6338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibylle Gerstl ◽  
Gédeon Kiwila ◽  
Mehul Dhorda ◽  
Sylvaine Lonlas ◽  
Mark Myatt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (2, Mar-Abr) ◽  
pp. 180-189
Author(s):  
Pedro Jesús Saturno-Hernández ◽  
Ofelia Poblano-Verástegui ◽  
Sergio Flores-Hernández ◽  
Ismael Martínez-Nicolas ◽  
Waldo Vieyra-Romero ◽  
...  

     Objetivo. Evaluar la calidad de la atención a neonatos con indicadores de proceso, en patologías seleccionadas. Ma­terial y métodos. Evaluación multicéntrica, transversal de nueve indicadores en 28 hospitales de 11 entidades de México. Se utilizó Lot Quality Assurance Sampling (LQAS) para estándares de calidad y muestra por hospital. Casos seleccio­nados al azar del Subsistema Automatizado de Egresos Hos­pitalarios. Se clasifican hospitales como “cumplimiento con estándar”/“no cumplimiento” por indicador y, cumplimiento con IC95% exacto binomial, regional y nacional, según mues­treo estratificado no proporcional. Resultados. Ningún indicador cumple el estándar de 75% en hospitales, con 0 a 19 hospitales que cumplen, según indicador. Excepto la iden­tificación oportuna de asfixia perinatal e inicio de antibiótico correcto en sospecha de sepsis temprana, el cumplimiento es <50% en todos los demás indicadores. Conclusiones. La calidad de la atención a neonatos en hospitales es heterogé­nea y deficiente. Se proponen indicadores para monitorizar iniciativas de mejora.


1990 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 1086-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
CLAUDIO F LANATA ◽  
GEORGE STROH ◽  
ROBERT E BLACK ◽  
HILDA GONZALES

PLoS ONE ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. e44775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sima Berendes ◽  
Olusegun Adeyemi ◽  
Edward Adekola Oladele ◽  
Olusola Bukola Oresanya ◽  
Festus Okoh ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document