Corticofugal feedback for auditory midbrain plasticity elicited by tones and electrical stimulation of basal forebrain in mice

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 871-879 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunfeng Zhang ◽  
Jacqueline J. Hakes ◽  
Stephan P. Bonfield ◽  
Jun Yan
1966 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 844-845 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. D. Clemente ◽  
M. H. Chase ◽  
T. K. Knauss ◽  
E. K. Sauerland ◽  
M. B. Sterman

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meike M. Rogalla ◽  
Adina Seibert ◽  
K Jannis Hildebrandt

AbstractIn patients with severe sensory impairment due to compromised peripheral function, partial restoration can be achieved by implantation of sensory prostheses for the electrical stimulation of the central nervous system. However, these state of the art approaches suffer from the drawback of limited spectral resolution. Electrical field spread depends on the impedance of the surrounding medium, impeding spatially focused electrical stimulation in neural tissue. To overcome these technical limitations, optogenetic excitation could be applied in such prostheses to achieve enhanced resolution through precise and differential stimulation of nearby neuronal ensembles within the central sensory pathway. Previous experiments have provided a first proof for behavioral detectability of optogenetic excitation in the rodent auditory system. However, little is known about the generation of complex and behaviorally relevant sensory patterns involving differential excitation. In this study, we developed an optogenetic implant to excite two spatially separated points along the tonotopy of the murine central inferior colliculus (ICc). Using a newly-devised reward-based operant Go/No-Go paradigm for the evaluation of optogenetic excitation of the auditory midbrain in freely moving, behaving mice, we demonstrate that differential optogenetic excitation of a sub-cortical sensory pathway is possible and efficient. Here we demonstrate how animals which were previously trained in a frequency discrimination paradigm a) rapidly generalize between sound and optogenetic excitation, b) generally detect optogenetic excitation at two different neuronal ensembles, and c) discriminate between them. Our results demonstrate for the first time that optogenetic excitation at different points of the ICc tonotopy elicits a stable response behavior over time periods of several months. With this study, we provide the first proof of principle for sub-cortical differential stimulation of sensory systems using complex artificial cues in freely moving animals.


1972 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
pp. 363-366
Author(s):  
David Fitzpatrick

Male rats were given brain stimulation before, during, and after copulation. Stimulation before mating improved performance while stimulation after mating improved the initiation of the next mating sequence. Stimulation during mating interfered with sexual behavior. It was concluded that stimulation during a mating sequence disrupts copulation, without being aversive, while stimulation outside of the sequence can improve mating in rats.


Author(s):  
Necla Birgul Iyison ◽  
Begum Devlet Kilickap ◽  
Burcin Duan Sahbaz ◽  
Bige Vardar ◽  
Burak Guclu

2013 ◽  
Vol 219 (4) ◽  
pp. 1493-1507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Il Kang ◽  
Marianne Groleau ◽  
Florence Dotigny ◽  
Hugo Giguère ◽  
Elvire Vaucher

2006 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 975-988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert H. Lim ◽  
David J. Anderson

The success and limitations of cochlear implants (CIs) along with recent advances in deep brain stimulation and neural engineering have motivated the development of a central auditory prosthesis. In this study, we investigated the effects of electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus central nucleus (ICC) on primary auditory cortex (A1) activity to determine the potential benefits of an auditory midbrain implant (AMI). We recorded multiunit activity in A1 of ketamine-anesthetized guinea pigs in response to single-pulse (200 μs/phase) monopolar stimulation of the ICC using multisite silicon-substrate probes. We then compared measures of threshold, dynamic range, and tonotopic spread of activation for ICC stimulation with that of published data for CI stimulation. Our results showed that compared with cochlear stimulation, ICC stimulation achieved: 1) thresholds about 8 dB lower; 2) dynamic ranges ≥4 dB greater; and 3) more localized, frequency-specific activation, even though frequency specificity was partially lost at higher stimulus levels for low-frequency ICC regions. Our results also showed that stimulation of rostral ICC regions elicited lower thresholds but with greater activation spread along the tonotopic gradient of A1 than did stimulation of more caudal regions. These results suggest that an AMI may improve frequency and level coding with lower energy requirements compared with CIs. However, a trade-off between lower perceptual thresholds and better frequency discrimination may exist that depends on location of stimulation along the caudorostral dimension of the ICC. Overall, this study provides the foundation for future AMI research and development.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document